News

Halt For-Profit Clinics: UBCM Resolution

BC municipalities to ponder denouncing 'private, for-profit surgical and MRI/CT facilities.'

By Tom Sandborn, 29 Sep 2009, TheTyee.ca

woman-mri-scan.jpg

Moratorium proposed on private medical scanning clinics.

Related

Delegates to this week's annual meeting of the Union of British Columbian Municipalities will debate a resolution calling on the province to declare a moratorium on any further development of for-profit surgical, MRI or CT scan clinics in B.C.

The resolution, proposed by Victoria and New Westminster city councils, also calls on the province to "end public funding of for-profit clinics, including the contracting-out of day surgeries and the provision of Health Authority contracts to for-profit clinics."

If passed, the resolution would put the UBCM, which includes 189 municipal and regional governments in B.C., on record as supporting the expansion of publicly funded and administered outpatient facilities to replace work currently being done by the controversial free enterprise medical facilities.

Pushing back against cuts

Victoria city councilor Sonya Chandler told The Tyee the resolution was inspired by arguments presented by the BC Health Coalition, a pro-public-healthcare lobby group.

The resolution comes at moment when B.C. health authorities reportedly are scrambling to earmark deep service cuts to deal with expected budget shortfalls.

Two Vancouver city councilors who will attend the UBCM told The Tyee that they plan on backing the proposal against for-profit clinics.

"I'll be at the mike to support this resolution," COPE councilor Ellen Woodsworth said.

Vancouver Vision party councilor Kerry Jang said he also would be supporting a moratorium on for profit clinics.

"Here's why," said Jang, who sits on the UBCM executive and its Healthy Communities committee. "In Vancouver, we have a health care crisis, with a large homeless population and large low income population. These citizens need quality health care and for-profit clinics won't help them."

Jang teaches at the UBC school of medicine. As a result of that experience, he said, "I am concerned that more for-profit clinics will lure new physicians out of the public system, where they are needed."

For-profit clinics doubled since 2004

The resolution says that the number of for-profit clinics in B.C. has doubled in the last five years, and that these clinics are operating "in breach of the Canada Health Act's criteria requiring universality and accessibility by charging patients privately for medically necessary and MSP insured hospital or physician services."

Hook into the UBCM Convention

Click on The Hook to stay up with this week's Union of British Columbia Municipalities policy convention. The Hook is The Tyee's political news blog, where you'll find several reports a day on the UBCM by Tyee reporters Monte Paulsen, Christine McLaren, Colleen Kimmett and Geoff Dembicki.

Hot items on the UBCM agenda include the lack of affordable housing, the provincial disposal of school properties, provincial and federal arts cuts, and, as reported in this article, support for public health care.

That trend has led to a legal case on health care delivery that may set important precedents when adjudicated this fall. As The Tyee has reported, the B.C. Supreme Court is going to be hearing charges about illegal billing at the province's private clinics this fall when it considers a legal action launched by former patients who claim that private clinics and doctors billed both the patients and the Medical Services Plan for the same procedures, breaking the Medicare Protection Act, which prohibits such "extra billing."

The patients' case, initiated by the B.C. Nurses Union, may be decided this fall in tandem with an action being brought by some of the province's private clinics.

The clinic action, filed a month after the patients' case, calls on the court to rule that provisions of the act that prohibit extra billing and restrict the role of private insurance in B.C. health care conflict with the Canadian Charter of Rights.

Victoria's mayor said to support resolution

Chandler told The Tyee that several Victoria delegates to the UBCM, including the city's mayor Dean Fortin, are preparing to speak in favor of the anti-private clinic resolution. She said she was cautiously hopeful about the resolution's prospects for success.

"I am a [registered nurse] myself, and one of the reasons I went into government was to try to protect the public health care system. We all need to stand up and protect this system. This resolution passed Victoria council with a resounding majority, and I hope the UBCM passes it too," she said.

She said the public system needs not just more money but a philosophical shift to focus more on preventative medicine and less on acute care. The need for change in the current system, she said, creates a danger the private system will "ride in like a hero" and be seen as the solution to the problem.

The resolution says the UBCM should "continue to research and monitor the threat to universal public health care posed by the operations of private, for-profit surgical and MRI/CT facilities in its members' communities."  [Tyee]

14  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Running Frog

    2 years ago

    Private Clinics DO NOT WORK..

    Credentials are not up to par; the quality of care simply isn't there.. They'll go through the motions but are HARDLY held accountable.. What we have is a population of "health scare providers" who definitely ensure that their patients keep coming back and back and back..

    And so on and so on and so on.. Per person this really adds up in pain management etc medications, endless therapy, loss of work, inability to cope, it's a full on break down of structure.. Or what I've personally witnessed: it's just another form of ENTRAPMENT.

    IT A VERY SAD TIME FOR CANADA; PEOPLE ARE GREATLY SUFFERING UNDER THIS FULLY DISGUSTING IRON FIST TODAY = 3rd World Health Care.

  • G West

    2 years ago

    From the American College of Radiology

    When the rate of errors and misreads is taken into account the Canadian record is significantly (between 20 and 30 per cent) better than that of the American college. Private for profit radiology and the transfer of digital images to India for interpretation are the biggest reasons for the difference.

    Canadians have better health care than Americans do now - mortality and morbidity are significantly worse in the States and Canadians, on average, live longer too.

    Why would anyone want to adopt a system that's failing?

  • Frank

    2 years ago

    American healthcare

    The best thing they have going for them is the huge reduction in smokers compared to other countries. Makes all their stats look a little better than if we still lived in the era of Mad Men.

  • Booker

    2 years ago

    Liberal health care

    The Liberals have set up a medical system where specialists try to steer patients away from the public system (in which they work part-time) to their private clinics where they can charge higher rates. It encourages dishonesty and does not serve the patient. Serving the patient comes second to serving the medical entrepreneur. We need to fund the public system properly and cut costs by cutting for-profit medicine.

  • Norman Farrell

    2 years ago

    Why Fraser Institute lobbies for private healthcare

    Always count on this organization to spread "research" saying, simply: "Private Healthcare Good - Public Healthcare Bad.

    Examine who funds and controls the Fraser Institute and take their information accordingly. Here are some of their Directors:

    Stuart M. Elman, President and CFO of Medisys Health Group, a healthcare services company.

    Shaun Francis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Medcan Health Management Inc, a provider of healthcare services. Prior to Medcan, he was Senior VP for Dallas based Broadlane, Inc., a business outsourcer for 900 US hospitals.

    Anna Stylianides joined the Surgical Spaces, Inc. Group of Companies as CEO and has been instrumental in overseeing its national expansion strategy as Canada's private healthcare consolidator.

    David H. Laidley is a director of Biovail Corporation, Canada's largest publicly traded pharmaceutical company.

    Catherine Windels, Director of International Affairs at international drug giant Pfizer.

    The full story here:

    http://northerninsights.blogspot.com/2009/09/fraser-institute-who-are-they-anyway.html

  • alive

    2 years ago

    Copying the US?

    There is something wrong when a country adopts a system of using private enterprise to carry out services that are essential to the public!
    We are on that slippery slope where our public health care is being eroded for private gains, and we see attempts at privatising police and security forces.
    Hospitals and care facilities are becoming storage facilities just as are some jails.
    The only motive is profit!

  • OilbertaRedTory

    2 years ago

    Triple-E Medicare :

    Equitable / Effective / Efficient /

    Abandoning the sick and poor for medical insurance corporation profits is deadly :
    http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/166/11/1399

  • Jeffrey J.

    2 years ago

    Liberal coaliition unraveling

    The BC Liberal party has dominated for a number of reasons (often set out here in the comments page). One of those is the past influence and control over BCs municipalities, which itself was the farm team for future Liberal wannabes. Yet now even the UBCM is waking up and taking a stand. Two thoughts: a breath of fresh air, and the Liberals have really screwed the pooch to alienate this normally staid, conservative group.

    I hope their motion passes unanimously. Looking for more courage to come.

  • BCthinker

    2 years ago

    Happy User of the private system

    I am a happy user of the private system. We do NOT have fewer doctors available to deal with patients - they are just working in different offices. My doctor still sees many patients, but has more than 6 minutes to see me per visit. I am lucky that I can afford to pay for more time. The fact that I am out of the public system means that someone else can use my time in the public system.

    My husband had a severe back injury and was put on the MRI waiting list June 2008. We opted for private surgery because of the severity of the pain so he had surgery in August 2008. Instant pain relief and back to a normal life in 6 weeks. In March 2009, we received a letter that his MRI in the public system was scheduled for that month.

    The public system CLEARLY needs to change, and to be available for people who cannot afford private care. I see no problem with the two systems peacefully co-existing, similar to public and private schools.

    I think the argument against a private system is a red herring, designed to take energy away from making hard decisions to improve the public system.

    There are fewer doctors in the public system because, among many things, of the stresses of a poorly funded system. Do we want to spend money on people or on things like entertainment (ie. 5 star accommodation for IOC officials).

    Hire more nurse-practitioners, more physician-assistants, fund more chronic care and 24 hour clinics, implement electronic medical records, etc.

    So much more can be done with some good problem-solving and backbone.

  • OilbertaRedTory

    2 years ago

    Thinking goes better with facts

    Fewer docs in Canada :

    http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/53/12/38976551.pdf

  • OilbertaRedTory

    2 years ago

    Privatized queue-jumpers ...

    ... suck up capacity leaving longer waits for the medically needier :

    http://www.michaelrachlis.com/pubs/2007%20Rachlis%20private%20public.pdf

    Fatter wallets make profit centres out of patients.

  • OilbertaRedTory

    2 years ago

    Solving problems publicly ...

    ... requires more than backbone ; we also need functional synapses.

    The private for-profit medical insurers need to open their books for a proper comparison with the public system.

    Or we could spend our lives in court when privateers fail :

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22357873/

    That's no way to grieve for a daughter.

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    It's not rocket science.

    If the private health care system siphons off the easiest-to-treat patients and patient-affordable treatments, this will dump the most expensive-to-treat patient into the public system, making it more expensive to run per patient, thus proving it is "inefficient".

    This is precisely the same syndrome as is found with car insurance.

    And that, it should be noted, is precisely what has made health insurance unaffordable for low income earners and those not on company plans in the US.

    Anyone who cannot see that the US system is what is peferable for Harper and Campbell has to be willingly blinkered.

  • G West

    2 years ago

    Nicely done OilbertaRedTory - thank you!

    You've saved me the trouble and time it would take to refute BCthinker's superficially attractive post.

    As for the existence of private schools - no problem - as long as not a penny of public money goes into their support.

    How long would your 'private' doctor last without the support and resources of the public system...if your doc wants out, let him surrender his billing number forever - pay market rates for hi-tech diagnostics and stay the hell out of public hospitals.

    You pay the whole freight - every penny....and he books out of the public system - forever.

    Then we'll compare apples with apples...until then, you haven't got a point and you should take your business to the USA or India if you really want to make a difference - all you business - not just orthopedic surgery.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.