Learn What's in Our Chemical Soup
Reproductive toxins are substances that poison the reproductive system. They can cause damaged sperm in men, infertility in women and early puberty. They can also damage growth in children and fetuses. Heavy metals like arsenic, or the lead recently found in some imported toys, are the most common offenders.
Recent research by Kim Dietrich at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine found a link between lead contamination in fetal development or during early childhood, and adult antisocial behavior leading to arrest. Even a tiny amount, a five- microgram/decilitre increment in prenatal or childhood blood lead levels, was associated with a 26 per cent increase in the rate of arrest for violent crimes.
Mercury is another good example, and can be found in everything from the fillings in our teeth, to "silent" light switches. In the book Slow Death By Rubber Duck, one of the authors ate tuna for every meal for three days. Simply upping his tuna intake catapulted the mercury in his blood to levels that would be dangerous to a pregnant woman.
Possibly the least understood and most terrifying are the endocrine disruptors. Unlike other chemicals, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can cause damage even at extremely low levels of exposure. These chemicals mimic natural human and animal hormones. When released into nature, they can either block natural hormones, or exaggerate their effects.
Tony Clement, when he was federal health minister, banned baby bottles containing bisphenol A (BPA) because tests on mice show that it mimics estrogen, and can affect early childhood development. Another well-known EDC is polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB).
Even if we restrict their use, many EDCs persist in the environment by accumulating in the food chain through the fats of mammals.
EDCs have been found in the breast milk of both humans and animals, even those who live far away from any obvious pollutants. Significant EDC contamination can come from the air, drinking water, and particularly skin through contact with chemicals in household and industrial products, cosmetics and clothing.
With EDCs the poison is not the dose; it's the timing. These chemicals can profoundly affect fetal or early child development at critical growing stages. They can cause emasculation, improper development of reproductive organs, including incomplete development of testes, and early-onset puberty in both animals and humans.
Even more sinister are the implications for women. New studies have shown that regular exposure to EDC's during pregnancy -- even at low doses -- can potentially affect the next two generations, since the eggs for the next generation are already being developed in the fetus. In other words, your grandmother -- in some ways -- was carrying you inside her body.
Poisons passed on
"What people are realizing now," says Mae Burrows, executive director of Toxic Free Canada, from her office in Vancouver, "is that you can't just look at the lifestyle of the 45-year-old woman who is developing breast cancer; you have to look at what her grandmother was exposed to."
As a consumer, I can only hope to curb the sea of toxins in which my daughter has been swimming since she was in utero. Unseen substances around her may have already affected her physical growth. We have been playing with powerful chemicals in everything from the fuel for our cars, to the teething toys we gave our children to suck as babies.
In the next article, we will look at how we can use Canada's labour laws to educate ourselves on toxic ingredients, and reduce the mass consumption of unnecessary chemicals in our environment.
On Wednesday, 'Toxics: The Right to Know, Part 2.' The Tyee looks at how we can use our labour laws to curb chemicals to safe levels, and how to decide what "safe" means when it comes to some of the most toxic ingredients made by man. ![]()
Learn What's in Our Chemical Soup: Page 2 of 2




14
Login or register to post comments
Fiat lux
2 years ago
Let's put this very simply:
Let's put this very simply: 50 years ago cancers were very few, around 5% I believe, none in children.
The first time we've heard the word "leukemia", happened in England, in the early '50s, when we were in our 20s, when the actor Red Skelton brought his little boy over to show him Europe, before he died of a "very rare cancer of the blood called leukemia". Look at the numbers now. We have a virtual epidemic, with the hospitals full of little bald headed children, many dying.
The first time we've heard the words "breast cancer" was in Vancouver, in the late '60s, when we were in our 40s and a young woman across the street came down and died from it. What are the percentages now? 30 or 40%?
Where are our governments to stop this crime wave? What is the point in wasting resources on cancer cures, when the causes are obvious and everybody with the slightest degree of intelligence knows them?
Brainwashed and misadvised by their warped economists, that this is all well and good, because it creates and "globally competitive equilibrium", jobs, and jacks up the GDP, the most important things in human existence.
The numbers are rising, the health budgets are rocketing without anybody daring to question why ?
If there was a more stupid generation in human history, we might need a lantern to find it .
Ed Deak. Big Lake
ReeferMadness
2 years ago
We've sold out...
to the notion that GDP is more important that anything else - even our children's health. What will it take for sanity to return?
Fiat lux
2 years ago
Reefer.........That sellout
Reefer.........That sellout is being taught in our universities as a "science". Yes, a science at the intellectual level of the Rosenberg religion.
Yet, nobody dares to question it? This is the most amazing contradiction of our present age.
Ed Deak.
DroneLove
2 years ago
THANK YOU
THANK YOU for posting on this topic. Environmental toxification is a huge issue and needs to be brought to light!
reallife
2 years ago
Yet we are living longer....
I have no background in these issues but there does seem to be a few inconsistencies. We are told our water, air and earth are being poisoned yet our life expectancies continue to lengthen. Is this because we have better tools to fight diseases or are we actually getting healthier? Presumably fewer industrial accidents and a less physically taxing work environment contributes to the increased life expectancy but probably does not constitute the entire difference.
It also seems that each generation is taller and larger than the previous one. Is this because we have better food in spite of the chemical pollution? Could it be that earlier puberty is related to healthier and larger young girls? It would be interesting to hear comments on these questions from someone who has a background on the topic.
Fiat lux
2 years ago
The bigger children are
The bigger children are mainly the result of tons of growth hormones and steroids pumped into the meat of animals in the animal factories and feedyards, lapped up not only in their homes, but especially in the fast food joints.
People have no idea what they're putting into chickens, pigs and cattle, but they lap up that adulterated meat and pay the consequences in obesity, diabetes, cancers, etc. now virtual epidemics.
But, according to our economists and politicians, this is "efficiency" and "cheap food"
Ed Deak.
Hermans Hermit
2 years ago
ED DEAK
North Korean men are 4 inches shorter than South Korean Men. Does that mean that South Korea uses more growth hormones in meat?
In the 1800's, American men were about 3 inches taller than Dutch men. Now Dutch men, the tallest people in Europe, are 3 inches taller than American men. Does that also mean that the Dutch use more hormones in their meat than Americans?
Fiat lux
2 years ago
You can bet that some
You can bet that some countries are using more. I've been in this business since 1948, organic since 1979.
Our calves get no shots, but there's no market for organic, so we have to sell them at the sales. They're being pumped full of growth chemicals as they're loaded on the buyers' trucks, then, there was an article in the Western Producer some years ago, where they followed some animals from feedlot to feedlot and every time they were moved , the whole process was repeated, until some calves received 5-6 times the recommended dosages.
There are no controls, or inspections, it is up to the feedlots what and how much they're putting into them to make them fat and get more profits.
Then on top of it, they're fed with grains to put stinking yellow tallow into the meat the North American public has become addicted to. If your meat is dripping fat onto the barbecue, that's the reason.
Some years ago we ran out of beef and couldn't get a butchering date. We bought beef in every supermarket and butcher shop in Williams Lake and it all ended up in the garbage. We couldn't eat the junk.
Ed Deak.
OilbertaRedTory
2 years ago
"Lies, damned lies and statistics"
... are almost as bad as coffee-klatch anecdotes.
But here's a link to some other points of view on early-onset menarche:
http://www.mum.org/menarage.htm
Cancers are many different diseases with different aetiologies; some are congenital, a few viral or even dietary. Different cancers affect different age groups in different countries at different times. But mostly cancers arise as we age.
At the beginning of the 1900s, stomach cancer was among the most common and now it's almost unheard of - except in Japan. http://www.nature.com/bjc/press_releases/p_r_jan04_6601511.html
But in 1900 TB was the no.1 killer.
So here's some better news:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(03)01260-9/fulltext
Neuroblastoma is disappearing in Canada because of dietary folate. Other strategies will work for other cancers.
'Average life expectancy' increases as infant mortality drops ; survive your first few years on earth, avoid accidental death, war, murder and suicide, treat infections quickly - voilà ! four-score-and-ten years are yours for the frittering.
North of Hope
2 years ago
Sustainability
Recently there has been a lot of talk about Global Warming and Climate Change. These are worthy of a lot of thought and action but they are only the beginning of the process to take care of the environment. We must remember plants, as well as animals and people, are part of the environment.
We need to be concerned about environmental alteration, not just climate change. We must be concerned about all pollutants, not just green house gases (GHG’s.) No chemicals should be used unless they are studied and tested for damage to animals, plants and the environment. These studies must be made public.
Three things we all need are housing, food and energy. We must get these without damaging the environment too much. Any activity we do will alter the environment. We must be able to get these in such a way so all forms of life can continue to live. We must become sustainable in obtaining all of these three things. We may want more things than the big 3 but sustainability is the key. If we are not sustainable in these, then we will run out of them and we may perish.
To reduce energy wrt food, we should use local foods as much as possible. We must grow them without harmful chemicals. BC and Canada should be self-sufficient wrt food. We may import food from other places but at no net cost to the environment.
BC and Canada should be self sufficient and sustainable in energy as well. We have to look at how we are going to get our energy. We must do a complete and thorough study of all ways we can generate energy, whether it be hydro, coal, solar, geothermal, wind, nuclear, wood, biofuels, gas or any other source of energy. All methods must be examined and these results must be public. Only after such a study can we use an energy source. We must do this so our energy sources are sustainable and not harmful to the environment.
For example, with the Site C Dam project, we would look at the need, if any, the costs to the environment, people displaced, farmland lost, water use downstream and the generation of energy without producing GHG’s.
No undertaking such as mining, housing developments, highways, etc. can be done without an environmental and sustainability analysis. We must be careful not to remove too many plants or trees, as we need them to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. Other wastes must be recycled rather than thrown into landfills or oceans. Recycling must become a major activity in our sustainable culture.
We must develop a national and provincial energy and food plans so we can look forward and know we can have a healthy life for future generations.
Fiat lux
2 years ago
North........I fully agree
North........I fully agree and have been working toward the highest degree of self sufficiency most of our lives. It has paid off big, now in our 80s.
Self sufficiency from the personal, local etc. levels in overlapping circles, cooperating with each other, is the best and only way for human and economic survival, but it won't happen under the present economic system, designed for the destruction of others and the environment under the idiotic name and concept of "competitive equilibrium", plus the existing so called "free trade" treaties, blackmailing and punishing people against logical thinking and actions.
By the way, how can an equilibrium be competitive at the same time?
Shows the kind of crap being taught in our universities as economics, yet people and politicians fall for it ???
Ed Deak.
Vancouver Liz
2 years ago
Excellent start ...
to your 5-part series. I look forward to reading every word.
Voice of reason
2 years ago
Let's not panic
This article raises some excellent points, but there are also some things that are troubling to me. Are cancer rates increasing? Or are we seeing an increase in cancer due to better detection methods and observing more cancers becuase people are living longer (and therefore increasing their chance of getting cancer)? I think that humans as a species have always had the capapbility of living to great age, but in the past we rarely achieved this due to lack of medical care and approporate nutrition and housing (life used to be a lot harder than it is today - and we also have access to antibiotics which has made a huge difference in the number of people that can make it to "old age").
I try to limit the number of "chemicals" my kids/myself are exposed to, but then I have to look at my father who is approaching age 65, and has smoked at least a pack a day of cigarettes since he was age 16 - how is it that he is still alive (and, despite a heavy cough, relativlty health)?
I agree that there should be more regulation concening ingredients. Why shouldn't consumers know exactly what they are buying? I called AirWick recently to ask if their air freshener contains phthatlates, and they told me over the phone (after taking down all kinds of information like my phone number, address etc) that it was "proprietary information" and I couldn't find out. Why not?
Also, the early puberty rates are troubling. I find it interesting that the Breast Cancer Fund is concerned with endocrince disruptors and the link to breast cancer rates, and yet it seems that many commercial products aimed at women (lipstick, perfume, nail polish) are being marketed as PINK (in support of breast cancer) to the very community that should perhpas be avioding those products - many of which have been shown to contain all number of hormone disrupting chemicals.
-Blackout-
2 years ago
Living Longer? Questioning Growth Hormones?
People better read this article and get angry cause its only the tip of the iceberg what's really being experimented on us. Why is the writers child getting her period earlier (and mens sperm counts at an all time low). Could it be the BPA in all our food plastic containers, water bottles, aluminum cans and glass bottles which acts as an estrogen? Could the constant chemtrails causing respiratory illnesses come into play?
We are only living longer cause the formula they use to come up with the age statistic has been changed. Abortions, child deaths etc. do not count anymore.
We as people better stop drinking the fluoride water and realize humanity is under attack. You may be laughing at my comment but go watch the CBC Documentary "The Disappearing Male" then watch the CBC news piece that shows males are obsolete and they can grow human sperm in a Pee-tree dish. Are we seriously gonna sit here as humans and watch humanity get wiped out. The new swine,bird,asian flu hybrid is a commin' (made by humans in a lab, check the WHO statements) and we are just sitting like docile sheep at a slaughter. When do we get mad and start to fight for what's right?