- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Ed Minister's 'No' to Parents, Teachers of Special Needs Kids
Keying off study, delegation asked for targeted funding.
Education Minister Shirley Bond.
Parents and teachers concerned about funding and programs for students with special needs left Victoria disappointed after meeting with Education Minister Shirley Bond earlier this week.
"I was hoping the minister would say she was going to look at this issue, that there would be more money coming to special needs," said Cecelia Reekie, whose child has a "mild to moderate" mental handicap and is in Grade 11 at a Langley school. "It didn't go. It was really disappointing."
Parents and the Langley Teachers' Association have been trying to get attention to the issue since a report outlined problems with programs and services for students with special needs in the district. Observers say that though the report focussed on Langley, it reflected problems throughout the province.
"There's no accountability for how that money is being spent," said Reekie. "Nobody sits down and talks to us about what we want." Parenting a child with special needs takes a lot of work, she added. "This is our life. To say you're not willing to sit down and discuss this with us is ridiculous."
And while the board and ministry refuse to act on the report, she said, the system is doing badly. "As far as I'm concerned we're failing our kids horribly."
De-targeted funding
"There was nothing that came out of there that gave us a whole lot of hope," said Gail Chaddock-Costello, a teacher and second vice president of the LTA. "We feel they've been sidelined once again."
Minister Bond told them at the February 25 meeting there would be no new money for students with special needs, she said. "If your pat answer is there is no new money, why don't you change how you structure it?"
When the Liberals came to office, she said, the Education Ministry gave boards money that was targeted for special needs students. "Now it's just rolled into a lump sum. There's no accountability and there's no way to know what should be spent where."
The ministry could go back to targeting money, she said. "It's very easy to change. It only takes the political will and the stroke of a pen."
Decentralized decisions
There are no plans to return to telling school boards how much money to spend serving students with special needs, said Minister Bond. "Probably there's been that debate that goes on, should we target or should we not," she said. "It's not something we're contemplating at the moment."
Bond sat as a school trustee in Prince George before her election to the legislature. As a trustee, she said, it was frustrating to try setting board budgets when virtually every dollar was targeted. So when the Liberals came to power in 2001, they acted on the belief decisions should be made as close to the classroom as possible.
In Langley that laissez-faire approach is taken a step further. The board uses a decentralized decision making process that allows individual schools to decide what to spend money on.
"There are pros and cons to the model," Bond said. However, she added, it is easier for parents to develop a working relationship with a local principal than it is with the minister of education. "Government, especially the provincial government, is not in the best position to make decisions for individual students across British Columbia."
She also acknowledged the Langley report raised some important issues and said ministry staff have been paying attention to it. "I think there are some areas we can work on," she said. "We're going to take the report seriously."
Snapshot of a crisis
The report from Langley is a snapshot of the crisis in special education, said NDP education critic David Cubberley. "It's representative of what's going on across B.C.," he said. "This is not a one off. This is documented in all the reports we're seeing from school districts."
There are fewer special education assistants available to work with an increasing number of students with special needs, he said, adding the problems go back to cuts the Liberals made six years ago. "The resources are simply inadequate and spread too thin for the kind of interventions that are needed to enable these kids to meet their potentials."
It's troubling that children can't get resources the ministry's own policies say the government is obliged to make available, he said. Working without enough resources also leads to demoralized teachers, he added.
Cubberley also met with the group from Langley while they were in Victoria. It's surprising the Langley board wouldn't meet with them. "I think it's very odd for trustees to sidestep looking into how their relationship with individual schools is or isn't working," he said.
Stable spending
School board staff meet with the LTA regularly, said Craig Spence, a spokesperson for the district. Trustees and senior management have looked at the report, he said. "They're aware of what's in it."
It's not, however, appropriate to meet to talk about the report, he said. The report makes recommendations for both the district and the province, including things related to class size and composition. "That's a matter for provincial bargaining," he said. "For us to be participating in a formal committee structure environment on these issues, the board feels is contrary to the intent of the school act."
In the 2007-2008 fiscal year the ministry gave the Langley school district $7.8 million targeted to spend on special education, he said. However, the district spent $20.2 million in the area. That funding is identical to what was spent in 2002, he said.
"The district spends far and away more than what's allocated to meet the needs of those students," he said. "The district has remained very committed to special education."
Forced to be adversarial
The authors of the Langley report wrote that information "was not especially forthcoming" from the district about how money is spent by schools. "The disposition of those funds is at the discretion of the school and not necessarily trackable," they wrote. Nor does the province require that the spending be tracked.
Though the inputs were unclear, the results were obvious, the authors said. "Despite the limitations in data, evidence from those most directly impacted overwhelmingly suggests that many students with special needs . . . are not receiving the educational programs designed to meet their learning needs."
A special education assistant with 11 years experience working in Langley schools, Kelly Dussin, said it is frustrating to work in a system without enough resources. "There's a high level of stress in our jobs trying to meet the needs of our students," she said. "We want to do the best for the kids and none of us feel we're accomplishing that right now . . . It's a system that needs to be looked at. These kids deserve an education as much as any other student."
Donna Gilbert, who has a 12-year-old with autism, said he isn't getting what he needs in a Langley school. He's bright and creative, she said, but needs consistency. "He's got a lot of potential," she said.
"Because he's different he needs to have support in the school system. I'd just like the school district to support my son."
For three years, she said, she and her husband have been trying to get more help for their son. "It's very sad parents have to go to the extent we've had to to support our children," she said, adding she feels forced to be adversarial. "I've never spoken out [publicly] in three years because you feel the pressure of being intimidated . . . I'm sick and tired."
Meeting with Minister Bond did little to encourage her, she said. "I was disappointed. I don't think they want to acknowledge the bigger picture."
Related Tyee stories:
- Aid Kids with Special Needs: Study
Report slams chronic 'underfunding' in BC schools. - BC's Big Box Education
Why we need better alternatives. - Study Finds 30,000 Vancouver Students in Overcrowded Classes
'Worst in province' for secondary schools, says union.




28
Login or register to post comments
G West
4 years ago
Shirley Bond isn't alone
in her dyspeptic approach to disability.
http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/News/2008/02/27/4879159-sun.html
Please note the remarks of Commissioner Turpel-Lafond and the 'lame' excuses of minister Christensen relative to the Fahlman case - which was decided months ago.
If the same diligence the government uses to address the problems of people were applied to the construction of the Olympic venues, the facilities for the Whistler party wouldn't be ready till 2025.
Shame.
simonfraser
4 years ago
as long as we continue with
as long as we continue with this ridiculous 'inclusion' policy this problem will be a moneytrap. these kids would be much better served in a faciclity that is designed and staffed appropriately. it's a touchy subject but it must be tackled. hopefully one day we'll have a gov't that has the courage to do so, but in the meantime i won't hold my breath.
gwk234
4 years ago
At the end of the day, most
At the end of the day, most "special needs" kids shouldn't even be in schools at all. Instead, as many as possible should be home schooled if their parents have the ability. They deserve better than to be discriminated against in a system that stifles their individuality and allows them to be shunned by their so-called peers.
G West
4 years ago
Ah yes, why shouldn't we shunt those 'problems'
Why shouldn't we shunt those 'problems' back into the shadows where they came from?
God knows there's money to be saved - money which could perhaps be invested in a few more Yaletown condo towers that will shortly declare bankruptcy.
No one is ever served well by leaving them out of society - and society is worse served by shunting its problems off into institutions.
Portly Gentleman: At this festive time of year, Mr. Scrooge, it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the poor and destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time.
Ebenezer: Why? Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?
Portly Gentleman: Many can't go there; and many would rather die.
Ebenezer: If they would rather die, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.
Birch
4 years ago
Let's grow up
and realize that the Liberal government has NEVER cared about public education and probably never will. Pretentious appointment of superintendents of achievement and focus on standardized testing (which makes the test publishers, private outfits, rich) is as far as they are likely to get with public education, creating more damage than anything else.
The Liberal priorities have always been to provide tax cuts to the affluent and spend what public monies must be spent promoting private business (including private schools).
Naive educators continue to go cap in hand, politely begging for a few crumbs to patch up the crumbling school system and get stonewalled by smiling dimwits whose private opinions are that all public spending is futile. Where are the dividends? the capital gains?
The Liberal government may talk a good line and may be pretty good spin manipulators, but their actions have always been clear. They DON'T CARE ABOUT PUBLIC EDUCATION. Period. Exclamation mark.
Chris H
4 years ago
Passing the buck
"There are no plans to return to telling school boards how much money to spend serving students with special needs, said Minister Bond."
Of course not! How could you pass the buck if you did that? The provincial government does not have to take any responsibility for how children with special needs are serviced because they have downloaded that to school boards. Langley has downloaded the responsibility to the individual school. Can you imagine making the decision what your school needed most, a custodian or a special education assistant? That is what happens in Langley. It is all about what to sacrifice because there simply is not enough money.
Frank
4 years ago
The kids
As simonfraser says its a touchy subject but I don't think keeping the kids at home nor putting them into institutions is the way to go.
There is a problem with them being the targets of bullies in a regular school environment but I think its better to work to solve that problem than remove the special needs kids. Besides, I think other kids benefit from having special needs kids in their school.
Overall, I just don't see how the special needs kids gain from being removed from view and we should be doing what is best for them.
gkam
4 years ago
better off
You are all better off than we are in the US. The appointee of Bush responsible for aid to the handicapped, such as children with special needs, fervently believed (and was quoted so), that those with disabilities were being punished by God.
When asked about children, she asserted these kids were being punished by God for something they had done in a previous life.
Ah, . . conservatism, gotta love it, . . for the black humor, if nothing else.
Name
4 years ago
Name
These kids aren't going anywhere, folks, so deal with it. That issue was decided several decades ago, it's been covered by the Charter, and there's no going back.
Besides, I don't think there's any way society wants to shell out the enormous amount of tax dollars it would cost to re-institutionalize them all for life today, which is basically where you're going with it. Apart from the fact more infants with moderate/severe disabilities survive childbirth and infancy (so there's a lot more of them vs the good ole days), they're also living to old age (thanks to modern medicine), and the costs of running institutions today are mind-boggling, what with cost of living and human rights and not being able to just drug them and chain them up and all...
There's about 50,000 of them in the public school system today with another 6,000 or so joining each year. The costs of failing to educate them so that they can function as independently and successfully in adulthood are already mind-boggling.
If you have no humanity, do it simply for your pocketbook. Pay now or pay exponentially more later
dorothy
4 years ago
Really?
"There's about 50,000 of them in the public school system today with another 6,000 or so joining each year."
Good grief, that's a staggering number! Let's grind to a halt here and ask ourselves, if we aren't doing something wrong on a much bigger and more fundamental scale. How the deuce do we produce that many children in our midst, who are not OK? Are we shortchanging the next generation from the outset in some horrible and profound ways, as an integral part of our culture?
I think we need to do some serious review of our practices of living and raising children. Throwing public money at the problem is neither fowl nor fish. We must actually be there in person and do some real work. Novel concepts, eh?
mcdull
4 years ago
I think it is time for a
I think it is time for a class action law suit against a government which plays lip service to no bullying and then has through its whole two terms. If you are poor or disagree with them you have no voice. It is a government which is not living up to the equality of all its citizens.
Name
4 years ago
That many...
Actually, Dorothy, that's the number identified in BC. Prevalence rates, which are pretty consistent across developed countries, suggest a ratio of about 15% of total enrolment (about 70,000 - 80,000 students), which suggests BC has a good number of unidentified students.
"Special needs" of course covers a wide range, from severely impaired students to those with very mild learning disabilities, or even gifted/learning disabled, which is actually more common than the counter-intuitive label would suggest.
The vast majority are capable of sufficient academic or skills development to live independently in adulthood. Sadly, lack of support and individual attention is an all-too-common reason for failure that leads to a predictable downward spiral of skipping classes, gangs, drugs, etc etc...
Social development, which is usually part of the challenge and often an even greater predictor of success in adulthood than academic achievement, is also greatly aided by exposure to positive role models (i.e. typical students), which is one of the benefits of the current model -- despite the worsening shortage of teaching/support resources.
Name
4 years ago
How do we produce that many that are not OK?
That's a good question, but actually, you need to turn it around.
It's not that we're producing so many that are not OK, but that relentless competition produces an increasingly narrow and demanding definition of "what it takes" to succeed. Many of these kids would never have been labelled "special needs" in years gone by. They would have muddled along, self identified as "not the academic type", left school early and ended up in a variety of perfectly respectable roles where literacy would not have really mattered.
Now they can't afford to do that in an increasingly competitive world where a plumber needs to take business training understand contract law, or to draft winning bid proposals, etc.
Plus we've found out they're not "dunces" -many are as capable of learning academics as everyone else and most are capable of some learning, they just learn in different ways. In fact, there's not really a black & white dividing line between special needs & "normal" - there's a whole range of learning styles, intelligences, splinter skills, etc. that cross back & forth across all the various labelled and unlabelled kids.
It's terrific that we have this new understanding of how differently people learn. We can do a whole lot more, but we've had to rethink how education is delivered. It costs more, for a start, to do more. And the school system is struggling with that.
But at the end of the day, Canada's overall wealth, social stability and productivity depends on solving this.
Fiat lux
4 years ago
It would be interesting to
It would be interesting to know Ms.Bond's religious beliefs, because in many cases handicapped children are considered being God's punishment for some imaginary sins of the parents and deserve what they get .
After all, when some people believe that black people are the punishment by God for Kham's laughing at Noah's balls, sentenced to be the servants of whites forever, they'll believe anything.
I grew up in such society,and have a good idea how religious beliefs can warp political/economic systems and the way some of these Ministers behave, talk and accept crazy economic theories, benefiting special interests as the Will of God, is very apparent from their actions.
Many years ago in Vancouver I heard of a guy from one of the Balkan countries I won't name. He escaped and did well enough to bring over his sister, who was by then a young woman.
He was showing her around Vancouver and as they were waiting for a traffic light on Hastings there was a blind man beside them tapping the curb with his white cane. The Balkan guy offered him his arm and led him across the street.
As they were walking on his sister asked: "What the hell did you do that for ?"
"Because the man was blind, so I helped him across the street"
" You must be crazy. Back home we throw stones at them!"
And this kind of mentality is very common in many societies warped by screwball beliefs.
Ed Deak.
SharingIsGood
4 years ago
visceral response
Personally,
I become physically ill whenever I see a picture or video clip of Campbell, Harper, Martin, Mulroney, Day, Bond, Taylor, Opal, Kruger. I have never believed that these peope have the average Canadian's or British Columbian's best interest at heart. I don't trust a one of them. I can say the same for the newcasters at Global and CTV. They can't keep the sneer out of their voices/faces whenever they report on working people joining together for their common good to overcome the forces of greed.
The manipulation and subterfuge by our current governments is transparent. Their quest for power seems absolute. They have sold their souls for pieces of silver. It is either that or the existence of a soul ever having resided in their flesh is doubtworthy.
I am no less deposed to feeling ill by their visages than I am of the sociopath, Pickton. To me, they are all the same.
zalm
4 years ago
Thanks to all
Very educational comments.
simonfraser
4 years ago
'I am no less deposed to
'I am no less deposed to feeling ill by their visages than I am of the sociopath, Pickton. To me, they are all the same.'
hopefully this poster has no influence on anyone'. this is some pretty sick rhetoric.
lynn
4 years ago
Diversity
Quote:
..."there's a whole range of learning styles, intelligences, splinter skills, etc. that cross back & forth across all the various labelled and unlabelled kids.
It's terrific that we have this new understanding of how differently people learn. We can do a whole lot more, but we've had to rethink how education is delivered.
Much appreciate these thoughts of yours, Name.
It's the real meaning of what education is about.
SharingIsGood
4 years ago
not rhetoric, simonfraser
It is not rhetoric, simonfraser, I mean and feel every word. I do get sick when I see these people's faces. I am not given to rhetoric.
Having worked on behalf of disadvantaged people for most of my adult life, I find that the Conservative and Liberal legislators have caused no less suffering than Pickton. Those lawmakers have continually worsened the plights of the most disadvantaged among us. They say some empty, feel-good things put together for a timely announcement here or there that makes it look like they are doing something about the problems that they have either caused or exascerbated through government claw-backs or the willful underfunding of the needs of society. They throw a few bucks here or there toward some little stop-gap measure to get their picture in the paper. They afforded this mostly through subsidizing the fiscal plans of the already wealthy.
The huge numbers of poor, and/or homeless people have children and families just like everyone else. Those poorly fed and ill-cared-for people often have difficulty keeping up with our fast-paced society. An uneducated or disabled parent is likely not going to be able to provide as well for his or her family as a fully-functioning adult. The disadvantaged need society's support.
The under-funded public schools have compounded problems caused by the underfunding yet mandated special education services coupled with underfunded and inadequate social supports outside of the schools. On top of this, we have a government that contiually markets the continually increasing number of ways one may gamble. The venues and hours of the day in which one may buy alcohol have also increased under the current governments. Through all of this addiction and poverty, Vancouver is becoming a gangster haven - like Chicago of the 20s and 30s. I'm afraid that once the recession really hits; it will get even uglier. Best place on Earth, pphhhht!
lynn
4 years ago
DECEIVEBC
Exactly, Sharing is Good, and all of that heartless subterfuge made possible under a calculated marketing campaign of BELIEVING.....
Fiat lux
4 years ago
Don't forget the economic
Don't forget the economic theories that give them the licence to exploit, enslave, rob and destroy people, and the ecology, in the name of "efficiency". Used to be called the "will of God".
Without the scriptures by prophets no religion, or ideology could exist and go on rampages.
All ideologies and religions can be and have been twisted around and distorted into the licencing of crime waves.
I've lived under every known ideology and have seen how they work and the bodies they leave behind in the name of racial theories, and the words Marx, Smith, von Hayek, Friedman, et al.
Unless we turn to physical laws based and democratically practiced economic systems this rampage, by sick minds, using the distorted words of prophets will go on and on, until it destroys all vestiges of civilization and Earth itself.
Ms. Bond is just another example of this fraud and it is hard to say whether she even realizes being a victim herself, just as the executioners also believed that they're following high principles.
Ed Deak.
simonfraser
4 years ago
sounds to me like you're a
[EDITED. -MODERATOR.] your comments in your previous post are quite hateful. i'm surprised the editor allowed them. what a horrible way to speak of others. i do sincerely hope that you're not in a position to influence others.
SharingIsGood
4 years ago
sf -topic is this gov't & Sp. needs kids
simonfraser: I am not the topic of this thread; but, since you besmirch my name, hate is not something I do. I do find it disturbing that this mean-spirited government has been allowed to continue. I find it disturbing that you would defend these people.
You see, before Campbell had come to power, the NDP had already downsized and streamlined services to children and families. An integrated service delivery plan was implemented in order to minimize duplication of efforts and to strategise between agencies and ministries. Implementation was a difficult, but it was seen as necessary. The change was supported through collaboration with all of the stakeholders - including business and the public. There were open-ended polls and study groups. Information was collected and collated; stategies were put together; downsizing through attrition was inacted; and things went about as smoothly as they could. BC professionals in education, social services, MCFD, health, mental health and the Min of the AG were chugging along, working hard and efficiently - improving the lives of all people by helping society's most needy. It wasn't perfect, but it worked pretty darn good and things were always getting better.
As a non-partisan person who worked both locally and provincially to implement these changes, I was filled with a sense of joy and awe that we had achieved so much and that we had tangible proof that our combined efforts were providing excellent results. Services were provided more cheaply and efficiently than ever before. Other provinces and countries (even from Europe) were sending their professionals to British Columbia to learn how to reduce costs, implement change and improve service delivery. BC was the model and BC professionals took pride in going the extra km.
The Campbell government came into power and proceeded to slash and hack away at virtually every government ministry and service while it sold off our money-making assets: BC Hydro, BC Rail, whole old growth Douglas fir logs and BC Gas to name a few.
The gains that the previous NDP governments had made in reducing costs while improving service carried Campbell for a few years, but as BC's most needy families have been dragged through 7 or 8 years of chronic Campbell underfunding, the cracks in the armour are now gaping holes revealing deeply festering wounds that are effecting us all.
Campbell and his cronies, including the main stream media, have not been truthful with the people of BC. Collectively, they have managed to strip a well-maintained provincial ship that was headed to the calm seas of high commodity prices and they have sent it toward the rocks. They have played havoc with our social infrastructure. The province is unprepard for the next economic storm. The decks are rusty, and barnacles grow thick while the engines grow tired.
Bailey
4 years ago
Deviance and social control
In psychiatric thinking, human characteristics are catalogued and evaluated, given weight and rated by importance. Some characteristics are judged good, some not. A picture of the "standard" emerges, and those who deviate from the standard are labeled. 'Special needs' is such a label, so is 'psychotic'.
Really, all humans represent in some fashion all possible human characteristics. The mix varies widely, however. In the past, competitiveness has been seen as very adaptive, a key to success, while empathy was not. Nor helpfulness, nor loving kindness, except to 'our own'. Those were only tolerated if applied to our own fealty groups. Otherwise, a laughable foolishness. Weakness.
Not too surprizing. Those without empathy or kindness have a great advantage in any competition. The psychotic tend to have little of these in their mix. One can understand where SharingIsGood's emotional reaction comes from. Anyone with such qualities must be very afraid of those without. And those without must see the compassionate as suckers, terminally naive victims to be fed on at will.
Labelling others as deviant allows a whole range of abuse to be justified, ranging from neglect to outright torture and extermination. And the labels, which of us are 'standard' and which are 'deviant', are placed by a political process.
Laws, regulations, funding, rhetoric, types of intervention that are permitted; social norms in the culture flow from these. Political processes all.
The west, maybe the whole world has suffered from unregulated competition because the competitive have been so successful at seizing power. No argument is permitted that goes to the idea that we face a time when we must cooperate or die. Such a perception is not possible, and in fact very dangerous, to anyone who lacks empathy.
I point out that the leaders who cannot see the duty they owe because they only have objective criteria to judge by are just as impaired as the children who lack the ability to count or speak or understand.
Those who rule us seem quite incapable of understanding what a human society is or what the value of each member is unless there is a dollar amount attached. They seem to lack any other means to judge.
Name
4 years ago
Competition vs. empathy
Great post, Bailey,
You remind me that empathy and that other stuff is crucial and very much adaptive when survival/success depends on group cooperation. It was crucial to our forefathers who hunted and gathered in bands, who gathered in villages and forts, who formed collectives on the prairie frontiers etc.
Being one tiny cog in a vast city changes that whole balance, but I hope it's a temporary imbalance, not our ultimate destiny to be this way and that awareness will help us actively work to change that.
HawkEyes
4 years ago
No Accountability
"The disposition of those funds is at the discretion of the school and not necessarily trackable"..."Nor does the province require that the spending be tracked."
I've heard of substantial funds granted on behalf of special needs children that simply disappeared...
At least one shortcoming has been addressed by this government.
SharingIsGood
4 years ago
underfunding and not targeted
Hawkeye:
Most districts spend more on special needs kids than the funding they receive. The funding needs to be both, targeted and increased.
After all, the government has no problem paying hugely increased construction costs to their favourite developers and road builders; why wouldn't they expect to have to pay likewise for educating special needs kids?
therose
4 years ago
Ditto-for Newfoundland and Labrador
Except the parents of special needs are not entitled to know how much is spent in any area. We are discouraged from talking to other parents whose children have learning struggles. It is a constant struggle in making sure our special needs children reach their full potential, and it is more difficult when the local school are barely meeting a single need, let alone addressing all of the needs of an individual learner