Hospitality Workers Flash Anger
March sweeps through big Vancouver hotel.
Workers outside Hyatt manager's office. Photo: T. Sandborn.
A rowdy, energetic crowd of over a hundred unionized hotel workers streamed up the stairs into the luxury lobby of the Hyatt Regency in Vancouver Tuesday afternoon, chanting slogans, demanding an immediate meeting with the hotel's new general manager Steve McNally and shouting, "Shame! Shame!" when told he was not available. Bemused tourists looked on as the workers, members of Unite Here, marched across soft, deep carpets and past the gleaming wood of the hotel's front desk to the manager's office.
Their spokeswoman, Beth Marshall, a 21-year veteran server with the multinational Hyatt chain, told the office staff who answered her knock on the manager's door they were there to deliver a message to management on the eve of three days of scheduled talks between her union and four major downtown hotels: The Hyatt, the Bayshore, Four Seasons and the Renaissance Vancouver. At all four hotels, unionized workers have been without a contract since the end of June. On August 29 workers at all four hotels voted, 85 per cent, to authorize strike action if these negotiations aren't productive, union spokespeople told The Tyee. At the Hyatt, the pro-strike vote was 95 per cent.
"We have a message for the general manager," Marshall said. "We've been without a decent contract for a long time. So far, management hasn't put anything on the table. Tell the manager and we want to see a decent offer from the company. We are serious here."
Down in the bowels
It all started in the part of the hotel guests never see. On Tuesday, in the basement staff room, there was excitement among women and men who make beds, serve drinks, carry luggage, check in guests and clean hallways for the multinational that owns the Hyatt.
"I've worked here for 21 years," Marshall said just before the workers met to strategize, "and my wages have only gone up four dollars an hour in that whole time. Twenty years ago my rent was one quarter of my monthly wages. Now the cost of my rent is more than half my monthly wages. This makes living in Vancouver increasingly impossible. We are fighting for our futures and the future of jobs in our city."
Off in a corner, someone started pounding on a table, and a young south Asian man in a scarlet UNITE HERE VANCOUVER WORKERS RISING t-shirt started a chant that filled the room. "What are we fighting for? Respect! Who's got the power? We've got the power! What kind of power? Union power!"
The crowd poured out of the cafeteria, up the stairs and into the part of the hotel that guests and management inhabit. After being turned away from the manager's office, they marched out in high spirits, chanting, singing and occasionally lifting a defiant fist in the air.
Offer pending says management
On the sidewalk outside the hotel, Randall Cooper, a member of the union executive said management's refusal to meet with the workers that afternoon was "shameful."
"We've been in negotiations for several months now," he said. "It's time for the Hyatt and the other big hotels to stop giving lame excuses and negotiate seriously."
In a phone message left for The Tyee on the evening of the 11th, Hyatt spokesman Rolf Osterwalder said:
"We have negotiations scheduled tomorrow. The employers will be presenting an offer."
However, Mr. Osterwalder's message did not reply to a request left for him earlier for comment on the September 11 demonstration in the Hyatt lobby.
Related Tyee stories:
- Posh Hotels, Painful Jobs
Room attendants press for better conditions. - Life's Harder in Seattle
Reviewed: 'Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada' - A City's Fragile Soul
The push to slick up Vancouver, and the price.



18
Login or register to post comments
G West
4 years ago
A sad testament to market capitalism
"I've worked here for 21 years," Marshall said just before the workers met to strategize, "and my wages have only gone up four dollars an hour in that whole time. Twenty years ago my rent was one quarter of my monthly wages. Now the cost of my rent is more than half my monthly wages. This makes living in Vancouver increasingly impossible. We are fighting for our futures and the future of jobs in our city."
Skywalker
4 years ago
It is only fair.
Give them the same increas Campbell gave himself. It is only fair and we won't talk about a pension plan. At least these workers don't spend all their time trying to put the boots to workers in general. They actually deserve 54%.
G West
4 years ago
perhaps we could get Tom d'Aquino
On their case...
murdock
4 years ago
what?
Respect is never 'won' by fighting, it is earned. While the current managers may not have earned much respect (95% strike vote says that) these workers have earned exactly zero respect from this action.
nope. not in this case, sorry.
The clients that come to the hotels and pay their way are who has the power here.
By making the hotels unpleasant and making it clear to these clients or future ones that these four hotels are not going to be nice places to stay and wrecking thier 5-star reputations these workers will progressively take the power in this situation...along the way they will soil their own nest and kill many of their jobs as the hotels will have to 'cut' in order to make ends meet after the job action...either that or the 'chain' locations just sell the licence out from under them and take their 5-star reputation somewhere else.
The only power they have is to extort, like the thugs that they are.
If they have so much great Union power, then collectively they should be able to buy one of the messed-up brownstones in the DTES and turn it into a 5-star hotel.
The reality is that union power is related to government power, and as we are collectively getting tired of the garbage that spews from those whom purport to govern us we are equally growing tired of the union extortion demands.
Rather than 'fight' for respect, why not hand in the collective pink slip and WALK!
If these worker's skills are so great they should be able to get paid what they are worth working where they want to...and presumably are needed.
All of these other actions are only those of gangsters.
or a mob.
alive
4 years ago
Hyatt stinks
Murdock, you have a lot to learn about union power!
What these worker did is exactly what they have to do in order to get the attention of management.
Only when the "bottomline" is affected will management begin to consider their options.
Yes, the hotels could move on with their 5 star rating, and perhaps get away with lousy pay the next place for a few years; but there is no way they can expect labour peace if they do.
It is time that "we" begin to accept that hospitality workers and childcare workers are real people who have every right to make a decent living!
G West
4 years ago
absolutely correct alive
Any company which provides for its basic front line workers so poorly that over 21 years they have only gained $4/hour in pay is neither respectful, nor deserving of any respect.
Anyone who stays at any of these hotels until this situation is fixed is party to mob rule - because mob rule is the way these hotels do business - typical corporate psychopathy.
monty
4 years ago
murdock
sounds like you vote conservative.
Stump
4 years ago
thier 5-star reputations
Murdock:
Do you suppose a hotel gets a five star rating based upon the neatness of the paperwork, or the condition of the rooms?
Seems to me the housekeeping, kitchen, and desk staff are the people who make the difference in one's hotel experience... not the manager in his office.
Think about it. Then you won't sound stupid.
oeanda
4 years ago
Quote:these workers have
murdock, you seem to have left out the part where you propose an alternative.
skeptikool
4 years ago
Settle, or the clout is coming
I'm sure that these "5-star" businesses charge 5-star prices and can well afford wages to match their employees' increased cost of living.
Workers should not be ashamed of letting the hotel patrons know what is going on. Perhaps some will feel a little peeved on checking out - more at the bill than the protesting employees.
I hope it's resolved in the workers' favor before then, but there will be the considerable clout preceding 2010, should the employers remain indifferent.
G West
4 years ago
hotel industry profitability
2007 Trends In The Hotel Industry Report
In 2006, the average hotel manager in our 71st Trends in the Hotel Industry survey achieved a 13.3 percent gain in operating profits(1), the third consecutive year of bottom-line increases in excess of ten percent. Favorable supply / demand conditions allowed these operators to enjoy an 8.2 percent jump in revenues for the year.
Survey Results
The following paragraphs highlight the major findings from this year's survey:
Revenue
• An 8.3 percent gain in average daily room rates was the main driver of the 8.2 percent increase in total revenue. Concurrently, occupancy rose just 0.4 percent. The net result was an 8.8 percent gain in rooms revenue, or RevPAR.
• Food and beverage revenues grew 7.1 percent, while sales in other operated departments (gift shop, golf, spa, movies, parking etc...) increased 5.9 percent.
• On the negative side, telecommunications revenue declined (-5.5 percent) for the sixth consecutive year.
Expenses
• Measured on a percentage basis, the two expense items that increased the most from 2005 to 2006 were management fees (10.0 percent) and franchise fees (9.5 percent). Since these fees are typically charged as a percentage of revenue, the sharp increases were attributable to the strong gain in revenue.
• Utility (7.3 percent) and insurance costs (9.5 percent) are two expense items over which management has limited control that grew significantly in 2006.
• For the year, hotel labor costs increased a relatively modest 4.8 percent. However, what continues to concern management is the fact that the growth in labor costs was driven primarily by the increase in employee benefits.
Profits
• With revenue expanding at a greater pace than expenses, hotel operating profits increased 13.3 percent in 2006.
• Full-service (15.9 percent) and all-suite (15.2 percent) hotels achieved the greatest gains in profits among the five property categories covered in our survey. Limited-service and convention hotels saw their bottom-lines' surge by 10.8 percent, while resorts achieved a profit increase of 9.6 percent.
[Emphasis mine - these are US figures but I'll wager Canadian results are probably as good or better.]
So, murdock, cry me a river - as for your suggestion that all these people just quit - give your head a shake - many of them have invested more in these businesses than the average shareholder - they should fight for their futures, decent pay and working conditions, their jobs and some real respect.
Good on 'em!
(source: http://www.hotelresource.com/index.php)
BC Mary
4 years ago
The room rates put these hotels in stratosphere territory
.
It's not as if these hotel rooms are cheap. Maybe if you're the Queen and pose for a picture to be hung in the lobby. But for the rest of us, it's more like a basic $250 or $350 a night. Plus food. Plus plus plus.
How do I know this? From checking out the details so I can attend some of the Supreme Court hearings and/or trial on the B.C. Rail case.
At these prices, surely the profit margins are ample enough to fund generous wage increases for the people who create the welcoming conditions inside these properties.
SharingIsGood
4 years ago
I've stayed in 3 of the 4 hotels
I can assure you that the prices in those hotels are very high and the help is most certainly underpaid for the work they do compared to the amount of money charged.
I recently stayed at the airport Hilton near Halifax. I found the room and its furniture worn and in need of repairs; it was dirty, the service poor. Belive me, I am not overly picky, but i notice things. In my younger days, I was a property manager of 100 condo units at a 4 Star Ski resort and I know what a hotel room should look like when it is clean and properly repaired. I took severl digital photos of offending qualities of the room and sent them to the Hilton management.
The manager had the audacity to write back crying that his job was hard because the room had been occupied for 97% of the days that the hotel had been open. He had no time to keep the rooms presentable - though the hotel charged top dollar. In other words, at the prices they charge, they have been making buckets of money and they couldn't find a way to hire more staff to do the work needed between the hours when people check in and when they check out.
After working at the ski resort, I went into the construction/development business, so I know what I am saying when I state: "I would imagine that the hotel will have paid for itself in just a couple of years of operation - three years, tops!" It's my guess that the young heiress and her clan need more cash to rent and dirty-up limos so some hapless sod of a minimum wage worker can clean it for them.
ME2
4 years ago
I looked in vain
for a response from Murdock. Maybe, perhaps, he thought better of it after being so thoroughly tromped on by everyone.
However, since I very often enjoy his comments, I'd prefer to believe he felt embarrassed at having dragged out all those oh-so-tired old anti-union canards, and thought it best to forget he wrote them.
Working Memory
4 years ago
Precursor to 2010
If hospitality workers think it's bad now, wait until they see what will happen when the 2010 Olympics arrive.
I recently posted an article about the current CUPE strike on my blog that hospitality workers will find interesting(http://www.olyblog.com/f/07/GarbageStrikeF09072007.shtml), but I cover the hospitality issue at length in my book, www.LeverageOlympicMomentum.com, and the outcome for workers, union or otherwise isn't pretty.
Hospitality workers will soon have to contend with thousands of young people from out of town, many with hospitality experience, interested in doing their jobs.
Legislation will change, if it hasn't already, in order to make it easier for employers to bring in temp help for the run up to and during 2010, the problem is that the temp help never leaves. This is one of the very big issues that CUPE is concerned about.
The CUPE garbage strike is only an introduction to other union labour challenges that will roll out in our region over the next couple of years.
If the hospitality workers haven't done so yet, the best tool they have is YouTube.
Upsetting a few tourists in the lobby has little impact, doing it globally however carries serious punch.
Think local. Act Global.
Stump
4 years ago
Global
Just don't expect to see much coverage ON Global.
or CTV for that matter.
kootcoot
4 years ago
Coverage on Glowball? yeah as if
Stump8 hours agoJust don't expect to see much coverage ON Global.
or CTV for that
How about on E! Entertainment World or whatever (somewhat more honest) name some of them are changing to?
onikrais
4 years ago
Hot flashes
There it is hot time for the Slave Dealer (Local 40 Union), and the Slave Buyer (Employer)as the workers are ageing.
The global walls came down, the doors are revolving, so the highly educated professionals can go back home if they are not happy with their janitorial jobs in Canada; the smuggled workers are not openly welcomed yet, the burque is not functional when serving at the bar or changing bed sheets in the 5-star hotel.
But there is always a way when is a will (money drive). In a silent consensus, the Local 40 and the Corporations energized these lobby walkers, gave them few slogans, armoured them with a revolutionary attitude, and convinced them to go on strike at the time when this will serve nothing but the Employer agenda: a ligitimate reason to push for a temporary workers program that will make the unions very happy too. They will step in obviously to prevent the "abuse" on these non-speaking for themselves workers, to "protect" and "cherish" until they fall apart from such a brotherhood. More members bring more union dues money, more marches, the same slogans - new voices. What a show! It is a win-win situation except for the most vulnerables who don't have anywhere to go.
Modern slavery at its best!