News

Farm Worker Safety Improved

Battle is only half-won, say advocates.

By Tom Sandborn, 4 May 2007, TheTyee.ca

Charan Gill

Gill: 'Address human rights'

Two months after three farm workers died in a controversial early morning highway crash that injured fourteen others, the minister of labour and citizens' services has announced a series of regulatory changes that will require seatbelts for all passengers in farm labour transport vans, add a total of six staff at WorkSafeBC and the Employment Standards Branch and toughen inspections and penalties for unsafe transportation of farm workers.

The changes will prohibit growers from using unlicensed labour contractors and suspend the licenses of contractors who repeatedly violate WorkSafeBC or Motor Vehicle Act regulations.

Minister Olga Illich said in a press release Thursday morning that "These changes build on the work we have done previously to protect farm workers -- and we are prepared to enforce new measures fully."

"B.C.'s farmers fully support all government initiatives around safety and compliance on the farm or during transportation to the workplace," the government press release quotes Steve Thompson, executive director of the BC Agricultural Council.

Some observers say the May 3rd announcement represents a victory for the families of the workers killed in the March tragedy and for the unions, advocates and community groups that called then for immediate action on farm worker safety.

However, they caution that the battle is only half-won.

They point out that while the government's proposed policy changes will address many concerns about worker safety, they do nothing to restore protections under the Employment Standards Act that were stripped away from farm workers in 2002 and 2003, changes which they say leave B.C. farm workers treated as second class citizens.

There are also, they say, questions of accountability left unanswered by what the Minister announced today.

'Chose to fight'

"This announcement is an important step forward for the families of the women who died, and for all farm workers," B.C. Federation of Labour president Jim Sinclair told the Tyee in a phone interview on Thursday evening. "These folks didn't just go away with their grief and loss. They chose to stand up and fight, and their victory today is a lesson to us all. It is wonderful that most of the safety changes we urged when we met with the minister in March have been implemented, but the public accountability and scrutiny we asked for isn't there, and the return of Employment Standards protections we demanded isn't there either."

"One of our central demands when we met with the Minister," Sinclair said, "was for an inter-agency farm worker committee that would co-ordinate the work of all the agencies concerned, and would report monthly to a public advisory committee that included actual farm workers. There is nothing in today's announcement to indicate that we're going to see that kind of transparency and accountability. It isn't enough to just have resources. They have to be co-ordinated, and the public has to know that they are being used effectively."

"These changes are a really good start," said Sarah Khan, staff lawyer with the Public Interest Advocacy Centre in Vancouver and an experienced advocate for farm workers. "There is a great recognition here of the need to deal with safety issues. But we think there should be more done on Employment Standards. There are no provisions in this announcement for restoring the protections workers lost. I am hearing from lots of farm workers that they want back the protections they lost in 2002 and 2003."

'Key issues of human rights'

Charan Gill, a former officer of the Canadian Farmworkers' Union and currently the head of the Progressive Intercultural Community Society, agrees that the Minister's announcement represents a useful first step, especially on safety issues, but he shares Khan's concerns regarding the silence on Employment Standards reforms.

"They didn't give an inch on rights," he told The Tyee in a phone interview. "There is no movement on statutory holiday pay, overtime, or vacation pay. These are key issues of human rights, and need to be addressed."

Raj Chouhan, like Gill a veteran of decades of organizing and advocacy for farm workers, is now NDP MLA for Burnaby Edmonds. He told the Tyee in a May 3rd phone interview that the minister's announcement fell far short of the "complete overhaul" needed in the way the government treats the province's agricultural workers.

"When we met with the minister and the families of the killed workers," he said," we gave her a brief with 29 recommendations. If she is serious, she needs to implement all the recommendations. Without restoring Employment Standards protections, she is leaving farm workers as second-class citizens. The picking season is around the corner. If the minister is serious she should move quickly on the issues she missed in today's announcement."

Minister Illich told The Tyee that she had no plans to make the suggested changes in the Employment Standards Act.

'Not going back'

"We are not going back to the one-size-fits all approach of the NDP," Illich said. "We're making sure people are safe, but the changes we made in Employment Standards coverage are consistent with other provinces and with American jurisdictions, and they make the industry more competitive. We spoke with farm workers who are happy about the changes. They can work as many hours as they want now. These changes in overtime have been made in other sectors too, such as the high tech industry."

When asked by The Tyee for names of farm workers who approved of the 2002/2003 changes in Employment Standards protections, the minister said she couldn't remember any. However, she did recall that the workers she was quoting had come to meetings with her accompanied by representatives of growers and other agricultural employers.

"The fact is," said BCFL president Jim Sinclair, "that the minister can't produce one farm worker or farm worker's organization that supports the cuts to Employment Standards protections. I just came tonight from a meeting with the survivors of the March crash and family members of the women who died. They were clear about wanting Employment Standards Act protections returned to farm workers. They want to be treated like other workers. We're a long way from done on this fight.

"The family members want a meeting with the minister here in Abbotsford," Sinclair added. "And we are sending a letter supporting that demand."

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

8  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • gordon

    5 years ago

    This might be a stupid assumption but...

    Hasn't there been mandatory seatbelt laws in Canada for a couple decades or so?

    And what is this designation of "farm labour" transport vehicle? I was under the impression that in Canada we have laws that apply to everyone, especially the rules of the road. Did government actually allow them to be packed to the roof in a van without seatblets flying down our roads and highways?

    Seems to me that special interest/lobby groups, that advocate for exemptions are now ending up full circle and being required to follow the same laws as the rest of us, because those laws protect lives and society.

    If only the government would see that the laws designed and implimented years ago, which they are trying to circumvent (namely environmental) will end up biting us all in the butt. But by the time the the fish are gone and the children are diseased and the air is thick and the land paved these evangelists of economy and consumerism will be long gone. you'll find them living off the 29% MLA pay increase and the fatcat pension in their luxury gated whistler village condo developments. Enjoy it while you can Mr Minister and Mr MLA, God has the last say and together we will dance on your grave.

  • snert

    5 years ago

    Buses

    Vehicles, no matter the size, that are designated as buses do not require seat belts. Ask any kid that uses a school bus. You may wish to correct you assumptions.

  • polanco

    5 years ago

    I agree this is a good

    I agree this is a good start. Why farm workers would want fewer rights is beyond me. I guess the Minister can explain. If we are to be competitive with other jurisdictions, why is it necessary to import foreign workers.
    Check the ad to the left of this story--a Central American company that will supply temporary farm workers to any jurisdiction where it is legal. Wow.

  • DPL

    5 years ago

    snert says! The vehicle used

    snert says!
    The vehicle used was a small bus that has seat belts normally. This one had two. We have alldriven in one at some time and guess what? seat belts. And you might notice that the highways guys for commercial vehilces and the cops took a large percentage of them off the road as being unsafe for other reasons as well.

  • snert

    5 years ago

    DPL

    They are in the process of changing the regs but if a motor vehicle is designated as a bus it does not require seatbelts. I rode them for years. Usually Ford 9 passenger vans. Didn't need a seatbelt on if you were stopped for a check.

  • dr evil

    5 years ago

    Not going back

    Quote:
    'Not going back'

    "We are not going back to the one-size-fits all approach of the NDP," Illich said.

    Like back to the idea of every life of equal value?..that sort of thing?

  • morechatter

    5 years ago

    think about it

    Who would have figured it was so simple really buckle up why didn't anyone think of it. Someone has to get real here and start taking responsiblity for others lives instead of some bogious buckle up as many unfortunates have lost their lives needlessly. Maybe the Liberals need to buckle up when it comes to a pay raise? How many is it now that have been sweep over and buried like garbage I know the numbers are high. Infact its a pretty close comparision BC liberals treat their garbage better than they do their poor. Now that is the truth. think about it

  • G West

    5 years ago

    More questions for Falcon in the Leg today

    Another Van fails inspection.

    What a wonderful system.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.