What Price the Beetle?
The Cariboo-Chilcotin region alone wants $489 million. Victoria commits to far less.
[Second in a three-part series]
The BC government and communities hard hit by the pine beetle are miles apart on a funding formula to help seed the economic survival of interior towns.
Already, BC's unfolding insect infestation has killed millions of pine trees over an area the size of Ireland, and as reported yesterday, after the frenzied logging of affected timber ends, that region risks economic devastation.
But with the BC government turning increasingly to Ottawa to come up with more funds, there are growing questions in interior communities about what BC will ultimately bring to the table to fix the problem.
"I'm not sure what the eventual number is going to be, but it's going to be a big number. . a big investment of dollars [needed from the province]," says Williams Lake Mayor Rick Gibson. No one in the region is looking for a giant 'welfare payment', he hastened to add. Rather, investments in a slew of things that will help his community and others 'move forward' from an oft-predicted crash in future logging rates.
'Action plan' from rural BC
Gibson is one of a number of local municipal leaders, economic development officers, and forest industry, community and conservation representatives in the Cariboo-Chilcotin who decided at the beginning of this year to band together and map out an "action plan" for dealing with the mountain pine beetle outbreak. The outbreak is considered among the worst forest health crises ever to confront BC.
After settling on a name for themselves - the Cariboo-Chilcotin Beetle Action Coalition -they drafted a report that was sent without fanfare to the BC government in the spring, shortly before the provincial election.
Their undertaking was understandable. The region's three main communities - 100 Mile House, Williams Lake and Quesnel - will be slammed by the outbreak, which is near its worst in this particular region.
The vast Chilcotin Plateau, spilling west from the Fraser River to the distant Coast Mountains, contains large areas of almost pure lodgepole pine forests. It also has significant tracts of "mixed" forests, containing a diversity of tree species including spruce and fir. But even in the mixed forests, pine trees are commonly found. And if current estimates about the ongoing outbreak hold true, this region will see 80 percent or more of its mature pine trees killed in the near future.
Any process involving forest industry players meeting to discuss the economic importance of BC's timber assets will be regarded with suspicion by some. But even if the conclusions reached by the coalition overstated the magnitude of what's at stake by, say, 50 percent, the numbers they arrived at were nothing short of humbling.
The coalition estimated that if you took all of BC's commercially viable pine trees today, logged and processed them, the economic opportunity associated with that activity would be $200 per cubic metre of wood for a grand total of $240 billion. In the Cariboo-Chilcotin region, the slice of that $240-billion pie was estimated to be one fifth or $48 billion.
The one percent solution
The coalition then came up with a proposal. Considering that the vast majority of trees now dead or soon to be killed will be on Crown or public forestlands, some money should be reinvested in the region by the provincial and federal governments.
How much? Well, in the Cariboo-Chilcotin region, the coalition suggested that an "appropriate" investment level would be one percent of the total estimated economic value. Cutting to the chase: $480 million.
The coalition went on to advocate that the Province and Ottawa each ante up $240 million. It said that the monies should be placed in a trust fund for targeted investments in reforestation, economic diversification initiatives, infrastructure, conservation and other measures. All of which was intended to soften the impending blow that will come after the beetles run their course and today's dramatically inflated logging rates - a response to the beetles - come crashing down.
"The epidemic is here, it's a natural event of potentially catastrophic proportions but it can be managed to maximize returns on the asset base, to rebuild the asset base and to manage liabilities and risks in the longer term," the committee concluded.
Beyond the beetle
In recent months, BC Forests Minister Rich Coleman has referred to the Cariboo-Chilcotin Beetle Action Coalition and other bodies like it that have emerged in the Interior as important "advisory" organizations whose thoughts are helping shape "the standards for the economic future" of the post-beetle, forestry-dependent Interior.
In a September opinion piece that Coleman penned for the Victoria Times-Colonist, he also talked about how his government recently committed $1.7 million in provincial funding to the coalition. He was silent on what, exactly, the money was to be spent on other than to say it would be used to develop a "regional recovery" strategy. And he made no comment whatsoever on the substantial public funding the coalition believed was needed to address the problem.
Two days after Coleman's words were published, NDP Forestry Critic and Cariboo North MLA Bob Simpson wrote his own piece, which appeared in the Williams Lake Tribune. Both pieces were fortuitously timed for just before an annual convention of municipal and regional government leaders in Vancouver in the last week of September which provincial MLAs routinely attend.
In his piece, Simpson accused the BC Liberal government of "doing nothing" of substance on the issue between 2001 and early 2005. And he went on to say that "the order of magnitude difference" between the amount of money the province had provided to the coalition and what the coalition said was needed to do the job was "staggering".
For his part, Gibson says he's happy with the fact that the province has made an initial amount of money available to help the coalition flesh out the details of a multi-faceted recovery plan. "The last thing we need is a whole lot of money dropped on the plate right now," Gibson told The Tyee. "What we need is a good solid plan, with some real strategies on the actions we need to take to diversify our economies and help us through the situation."
But at the end of the day, he said "a substantial investment" on the order of the $480 million originally proposed by the coalition would be needed.
When the beetles finally run their course in BC over the next few years, it is estimated that pine trees spread over 4 million hectares of provincial forestland will have been killed and left unlogged. No one knows for certain what the immediate economic implications of the attack will be. But with an upper estimated range of 700 million cubic metres of dead and unlogged pine trees remaining on the landscape following the attack, tens of billions of dollars worth of timber will be unusable for lumber and wood pulp, commodities that have been the economic mainstay of much of interior BC for decades.
Whose responsibility?
Coleman has admitted that at least some of those lands should be regenerated with new trees, and he's said that his government has committed $86 million to date to do that work.
But if the Cariboo-Chilcotin Beetle Action Coaltion's numbers are even close to what is needed for their region let alone others - $86 million will vaporize very quickly. It doesn't come close to what is needed to do the reforestation job, let alone the more tricky and demanding work of charting a new economic development and forest conservation strategy for the region.
At the same time, provincial funds that would otherwise have been available to increase a publicly funded reforestation and economic recovery program are being foregone.
As Simpson wrote, "the provincial government assigned next to nothing to address the mountain pine beetle epidemic in this year's budget yet they gave corporations an 'unexpected and surprising' corporate tax cut of about $500 million dollars. In my estimation, this government has its priorities wrong and it clearly does not understand the magnitude of the issues that we in the 'heartlands' are confronted with."
Another critique might be that the government understands perfectly well the magnitude of the problem. It just wants someone else to pay, namely, Ottawa.
On September 19, Premier Campbell held a press conference in Ottawa. With his hand hovering over a map showing the boggling spread of the beetle outbreak in the province, he announced how his government planned to spend $100 million in federal funds to respond to the unfolding attack. Later, he said he wanted $1 billion more from Ottawa over the next 15 years, calling the $100 million already provided by the federal government a "down payment".
Oddly, in the ensuring reports on Campbell's announcement, nobody seems to have asked the premier the obvious question: Why all the focus on Ottawa? Isn't forestry a provincial responsibility?
Members of the Cariboo-Chilcotin Beetle Action Coalition may soon be asking another question.
With tens of billions of dollars having poured into Victoria in forestry revenues over the years, what does the provincial government believe is a reasonable amount of money to return to our communities to reinvest in the resource and our economic future? We've got our number, says the coalition. What's yours?
Tomorrow: Can We Replant a Beetle-Proof Forest?
Yesterday: The Bug in BC's Economy
For an animated map showing the spread of the Mountain Pine Beetle in BC, go here.
Freelance writer and researcher Ben Parfitt lives in Victoria. He is a frequent writer and commentator on natural resource, business, environmental and social justice issues for a variety of publications and author of Forest Follies: Adventures and Misadventures in the Great Canadian Forest. ![]()




7
Login or register to post comments
Fiat lux
6 years ago
Comments on "What Price the Beetle?"
Mayor Rick Gibson of Williams Lake is a village millionaire, neocon, BCLib, development and investment maniac. Luckily, he's not running again, so at least people in the area won't have to look at his ...... face in the papers any more.
The the BC Lib controlled WL council is now willing to spend $100,000 on the defence against a lawsuit launched by citizens against a huge Wal-Mart store the council is planning to plant next to their homes with the resulting mess, pollution, noise and loss of property values. Not to mention that the established economies of thousands of communities have been destroyed by these parasitical carpetbaggers, but WL is dying for it and probably from it.
As far economic diversification is concerned, it can be done very inexpensively by getting the hell out of NAFTA and the WTO and start building up local, small business economies for local consumption and trade. This will have to come anyway with the end of the oil economy that has ruined the real economic structure of the whole world, making it dependent on exports and imports, and making the middlemen class virtual global dictators.
I've been in small manufacturing systems for 50 years here in Canada and can create any number of jobs with investments under $15,000 per job.
But these jobs would never survive under the present system of "cheap" imports, distorting the real picture. What people should realize is that if produxt X costs $10. to make in Canada, but it can be imported for $1. from China, the ultimate cost to the Canadian, or BC economy will be at least $10. or $ 20, or whatever, through unemployment, welfare, sickness, crime and substance abuse problems, traffic accidents caused by road rage and booze, family breakdowns, loss of educational opportunities for young people, pollution etc, etc, for pages.
These costs are never accounted as liabilities by miseducated economists of the neoclassical, braindead variety, indeed, some of it may be jacking up the phoney GDP, as will the exploitation of the beetle kill. After all road accidents are jcking up the GDP, which is typical of this nonsense served up to pacify people
Present monetary values, under the deregulated money creation system by the banks are not realitites, but often violence induced temporary perceptions, used to disempower and enslave people, therefore can not be used for real economic calculations.
Therefore, the monetary figures quoted by either side mean absolutely nothing, especially when it will all disappear in the bank accounts of the multinational corporate mafia, leaving next to nothing for the real people of the region.
Indeed, it will serve the neocon agenda to depopulate the countryside and force people into the cities, "where the jobs are".
Ed Deak, Big Lake.
skeptikool
6 years ago
The history of B.C. forestry is one of having taken the rightful owners of the forests, B.C. residents, to the cleaners.
From the start, the forests should have been nationalized - and remained so.
Like thieves in the night, the industry has gotten away with it because many of the operations' waste and mismanagement occurs out of view and also, in my opinion, has much of the questionable log-scaling.
We've had also the "crime" of whole log shipment along with jobs.
When resources, industries and projects are privatized, governments may be, and are, bought - and the taxpayer always pays the bill.
Fiat lux
6 years ago
I agree. As a small, private enterpriser, I believe in an economy under public supervision for the public interest, which includes the public ownership and control of resources, large and small businesses regulated to serve the widest public interest and environmental protection.
The taxpayer always pays the bill one way, or another, because corporate profits over and above acceptable levels of genuine earnings, are also a form of taxation, carefully hidden from the public. Then if those profits end up abroad, they are little more than legalized theft. At least, in the past they paid some of it back in taxes, now they laugh all the way to the banks of tax havens.
Of course, the public is fully responsible for electing shyster governments, who permit total exploitation. We still have some 250 to 350 year old trees on our land, some over 2 m. across. If we'd put our land up for sale, it would be bought by some logging contractor, who'd never even bother to look at our house, etc. strip the land bare in 2 weeks and put it up for sale again.
This is norm around here, with total government cooperation. So, we gave our land away, free, to people we can trust to look after it.
Ed Deak.
scylla
6 years ago
Creating jobs at $15,000 a pop, Ed ? Why your Williams Lake City Council - or any other for that matter - wouldn't even hire a consultant who'd work that cheap.
Now, if $4-500 mill could be found, perhaps we might find someone with a real success story who could save our bacon.
Maybe we could interest Accenture - who I understand has ALL the right connections - in persuading somebody like Brascan to show us how to do it properly.
Imagine, $15,000! The nerve!
Fiat lux
6 years ago
Please read what I wrote, which was "creating jobs for $15,000, or less, investment per job" This doesn't say anything about wages, because a $15,000 job could easily earn $40 or 50,000 per year in wages.
As I mentioned some days ago on another topic, I opened my first shop in Vancouver with a $500. bankloan in 1957 and within weeks I was employing a dozen skilled tradesmen.
$500 1957 dollars would be anywhere from $5, to 10,000 today, but now many different shops could be opened for that kind of investment, with low priced Chinese machinery.
I just bought a jigsaw for $15. at Canadian Tire, this afternoon. In 1957 the same jigsaw of much poorer quality cost $40. which was almost a week's wages. My first used router cost me $90. , which was a week and a half's wages. My first 12" , worn out, old thickness planer was $25O. about 5 weeks wages. Today I could buy a brand new one for 250. 2005 dollars, or a bit more. Today I could buy a new 16" thickness planer for $1,200, which is less than 2 weeks wages for a tradesman. Back in 1957 it was an unimaginable dream to have one in a small shop.
In 1974 I moved my shop into a larger location, and bought a new "General" drillpress for $1,200. 1974 dollars. Today I can buy a better one for $ 185. of today's dollars.
So, although I hate to see "Made in China" written on every product, if I'd had to open another shop, I could do it for a fraction of what it cost me in 1957 dollars.
In other words, Scylla, I speak from, long experience in business. Ed Deak.
scylla
6 years ago
Ed, I am among the many on this site who value your perpective and your knowledge.
My posting above was intended to satirise what I thought would be a typical Troll response. Please view it in that manner. Sorry if it was clumsy.
There was definitely no offense intended.
Fiat lux
6 years ago
I don't take offense that quickly and easily, but thought I should clarify the picture. When I get the usual Lee Valley catalogues, as an old woodworker, my heart bleeds all over the place when I see the tools people can buy today, which were simply not available 30-40 years ago. We had to comb the fleamarkets and garage sales for simple things, like spokeshaves, because there weren't any in the stores and electric tools were priced like if they'd been gold plated.
So, no offence taken, all the best, Ed.