News

He Survived the Doomed Dieppe Raid

At 84, Leaman Patterson philosophizes about being cannon fodder.

By Quentin Dodd, 19 Aug 2005, TheTyee.ca

Dieppe

It’s been more than 60 years now, but as August 19 approaches each year, the memories keep flooding back for a dwindling group of Canadians who took part in a World War II raid which many say should never have happened in the first place.

Campbell River resident and former Calgary Tanks trooper Leaman Patterson is one of them.

For Patterson, his first engagement with the enemy, on the shell-torn beach of the French seaside resort of Dieppe, was his last. The tank he drove was among the last to arrive and the battle was already well under way when finally the ramp went down on the Tank Landing Craft (TLC) he was aboard. Patterson’s taste of warfare lasted only a scant four or five hours after that. He then spent close to three years as a prisoner of war.

Speaking of the tragedy of the 1942 Dieppe Raid a few days ago, Patterson told me that he has heard a wide assortment of reasons put forward for the doomed attack over the years. He’s not sure what to believe, but he knows and recognizes that sometimes in war, soldiers – sometimes hundreds of them – have to be sacrificed to make a point, perhaps as much with an army’s allies as with the enemy.

Many of the men who fought and died or were wounded and captured that summer’s morning had impulsively joined Patterson’s regiment as it was sent to training at Camp Borden in Ontario. They had heard that they, already enlisted in other forces, were probably going to be left behind while the Calgary Tanks went abroad to the fighting. So they leapt at the chance to join the Calgary Tanks.

And then, almost to a man, they were slaughtered in the Dieppe raid.

Rain of fire

The raid was a combined-forces operation with almost all Canadian ground-troops. The Calgary Tanks and their machines were expected to stay behind to try to give cover and covering fire to the retreating infantry as the British Navy tried desperately to take them off the beach, back to the safety of England.

The evacuation too brought more than its share of danger and death. On the steeply sloping beach, there was some cover from the deadly fire of the Germans in the town. When the retreating troops moved out to get aboard the waiting evacuation vessels, they were seen to come under devastating fire.

“I saw one craft. They were just pulling out and the Germans just dropped a mortar shell right on it and they were likely all killed,” Patterson said.

It was not the first or the last time he saw men killed and wounded that day as the Germans rained fire down on the invading troops from the tall buildings of the once-peaceful casino town and from the gun emplacements on the top of the high, sheer cliffs at each end of the small, deep bay.

“We didn’t really hear very much when the ramp went down on the TLC (Tank Landing Craft). There was some racket of the battle but we didn’t hear much because of the tank engines,” Patterson said, remembering the roar given off by two other tanks on the landing craft with him.

By then it was broad daylight. The attack had been meant to go in before dawn, under cover of darkness.

Direct hit

All three tanks in the TLC Patterson was aboard had been fully sealed in case they landed in five or six feet of water, and they had to blow their sealing off explosively once they reached the beach.

It was immediately after blowing that seal that Patterson saw his first death through the three-inch perspex of his driver’s slot.

“The first casualty I saw was a young engineer I had been chatting to the night before, who was meant to go up and blow up the concrete obstructions the Germans had put there. He tried to crawl up the bank (of the beach) with his explosives. His explosives kit was hit and was blazing. He must have been in agony. I’m glad I couldn’t hear him screaming.”

When it was his Churchill tank’s turn to leave the landing craft, Patterson followed the other two as they made towards the town. The others managed to get out of the sight of the deadly fire into the initial part of the town before the German gunners could get the range. But as Patterson steered after them and crested the bank of the beach, the tank instantly took a direct hit on its exposed front, totally destroying the steering column in his hands.

Patterson estimates his group had been on the beach no more than about five minutes. He was momentarily knocked unconscious by the blast and his co-driver alongside him received a neck wound which was pumping blood until they slapped a field dressing on it.

But the tank, which had been knocked some 30 feet back down the slope by the blast, was still operable. The steering was gone but it could still move backwards and forwards and the turret and its gun were still in good working order. So, directed by an officer on the beach picking targets, the tank, given the name Canny, popped up to fire a two-pound shell at selected targets and then quickly fall back behind the cover of the cobble-stone beach. That continued for some hours, until the tank had to be abandoned and one of the crew tossed in a special explosive to disable it and prevent it from falling into enemy hands.

“I got separated from the rest of the crew after that,” Patterson recalled. “We were all in a shell-hole and when I came out there was nobody around. I later remember being in a shell-hole and they were trying to get me with a mortar. They were getting pretty close too. I think I must have been a bit shell-shocked, because they found me wandering about the beach (after the cease-fire and surrender).”

Witness to execution

It was after that, Pattterson recalls, that he happened to witness a German officer execute one of his own men. The young private had been looting the Canadian dead and prisoners, taking anything he could. When he took a prisoner’s picture of his wife or family and the Canadian asked for it back, the private ripped it in two.

“The officer might just have come out of officer’s training - he was immaculate,” said Patterson. “He spoke to this private and the guy turned around, and the officer shot him right in the head, right in front of me. I have to admit I didn’t think much about it. He put his gun in his holster and looked a little sick and then just walked off.”

Patterson had been slightly but painfully wounded in the face by the mortar-shelling among the beach’s cobble-stones, and he was put into hospital in Rouen for a few days by his German captors. The Germans soon decided that Patterson was “malingering” as he put it, and he was then sent to catch up with the hundreds of other troops from the raid who were in holding camps waiting to be sent to POW camps. Those camps turned out to be not in Germany, but Poland.

Patterson therefore found himself on one of the infamous Death Marches with other POWs, as the Germans retreated before the Russians in the final stages of the war. For him the march began Robbie Burns’ Day in late January 1945 and lasted through to May, when he was finally liberated.

Patterson said he found life in the two POW camps he was mostly boring, with poor rations and food. He recalls seeing a sergeant escape carrying a small suitcase one day while the prisoners set up a diversion for the guards by staging a wrestling match. The most anxious time was when the prisoners from Dieppe were ordered tied up because some captured Germans had been tied up with short lengths of string - contrary to the Geneva Convention on the treatment of POWs - for taking back to England.

“After some weeks, Hitler ordered that they change that to (wrist) shackles and that went on for months,” said Patterson. “That was an anxious time because we didn’t know what to expect or what they were going to do with us. Eventually there was a prisoner exchange and the [German] prisoners from Canada told how well they had been treated over here, so they took the shackles off. We had to wear them from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and we used to use the key from bully-beef cans to unlock them. I spent a couple or three hours chained to a tree outside once or twice for going without my shackles.”

Was it necessary?

Patterson said while he remains unclear about the exact purpose of the raid, he thinks the commanders probably knew it was going to be a massacre but went ahead with it anyway, to draw pressure off the besieged Russians at Stalingrad and to make a point to the Russians that the Allies in England were not ready yet to mount a Second Front on the Atlantic coastline of Europe. No other frontal attack was ever made from the ocean on a fortified port during the rest of the war, and the D-Day invasion took place on beaches away from towns.

“I think it was probably done on purpose,” the 84-year-old said without apparent bitterness. “As you know, in warfare, to sacrifice 600 or 700 men to gain a point is peanuts and I believe it was to show the rest of the world we were not ready.”

Patterson said one other thing many of the tank commanders and drivers were not ready for was the cobble stones of the beach on Dieppe, which piled up on the tracks of many of the tanks, were carried round into the drive wheels, and there caused the tracks to snap and break.

Fortunately for him, he said, he and the people in the tanks in the troop aboard his landing craft were from agricultural parts of Alberta and Saskatchewan, used to working with tractors and tracked vehicles on farms. They spotted the danger and warned others not to turn their tank too sharply, to avoid the big stones piling up on the tracks.

His background on a farm in Alberta had served him well, but he still counts himself lucky not to have been among the 907 soldiers killed in the brief battle that day. A total of 119 Allied aircraft were also lost in an air-battle overhead, 13 of them from eight Canadian squadrons.

“A lot of good men went to meet their Maker that day,” he said.

Campbell River journalist Quentin Dodd is a regular contributor to The Tyee.  [Tyee]

29  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Colin

    6 years ago

    Comments on "He Survived the Doomed Dieppe Raid"

    I always thought the raid suffered from “mission creep” were the original plan and objectives are lost to satisfy other purposes. I also think the British were over optimistic because of the success of other raids. Although a lot of lessons were learned here, most of them could have been learned elsewhere and without the debacle. Dieppe was a defeat no matter how look at, the Germans knew they were coming, the raid was late and way to big and at the wrong point. The Germans acknowledged that the Canadians fought well and bravely, but the battle was decided before the landing ramps came down.
    Amphioxus operations are the most difficult to do and are most likely to fail, without good planning.

  • skeptikool

    6 years ago

    What a thoroughly depressing story. They might as well have been dropped into an inactive volcano and been expected to capture its fortified rim.

    Young men fooled by their leaders and the glory of war:

    "So they leapt at the chance to join the Calgary Tanks.

    And then, almost to a man, they were slaughtered in the Dieppe raid."

    There are many, like the Haliburtons of this world, up to their elbows in the bloody results of war while never shedding a drop. One should always ask, Who benefits?

  • Ron Erwin

    6 years ago

    Who benefits ? You do.

  • scylla

    6 years ago

    What a stupid comment.

  • tommymoore

    6 years ago

    True to form, as always. Ron Earwig once again bathes us in the glow of his inspiring intellect.

  • ursus

    6 years ago

    the Calgary Tanks were also at Ortona, one of the worst of the many battls Canadians fought in the fight for Ortona cost Canada 2339 Soldiers. Mark Zuehlke has written a very good book on this battle.

  • willy

    6 years ago

    People in this world such as scylla, tommymoore and skeptikool scare me

  • skeptikool

    6 years ago

    Feeble, Willy.

    But thanks for trying to wake the board.

  • willy

    6 years ago

    Skeptikool where do you think the right to have a board like this came from, by people who were willing to go over the wall to protect your feeble ass

  • skeptikool

    6 years ago

    Okay. I'll take the bait but with so little participation, I'm starting to think there're better things for me to do. It's a damned shame. This is how message boards die.

    First off, please spare me the Poppy Day BS.

    In the two major wars of the last century many enlisted or were called up in economically depressed times. Many were barely literate but welcomed employment and the promise of travel away from the Prairies or England's dingy Midlands with their mean cottages and meaner streets and little future.

    There would have been the invincibility of youth until they got to the blood and gore of the trenches or became sitting ducks on the Dieppe beaches.

    That may be glory for Hollywood but to me it's insanity, waste and state-sanctioned slaughter to satisfy politicians, militarists and arms dealers.

    A classic example is the Iron Lady, Thug Thatcher, very low in the polls but winning reelection after the Falklands/Malvinas war.

  • Colin

    6 years ago

    If the British had not responded to the invasion of the Falklands by a dictatorship, then they would have been fighting in Belize within two years.

    Belize is claimed by Guatemala and they have threatened to invade several times and only the intervention by the Brits stopped them.

    The British were the victims in the Falkland war, they were ready to negotiate a transfer of the Islands, despite the opposition from the people living there who did not want to live under Argentinean rule (can’t blame them) However the Brits wanted to ensure protection of their rights.

    At the time the British were busy slashing their fleet, if the Argentines had waited one more year the Brits would have not been able to respond. In fact it was the recall of the survey ship Endeavour (I think) that made the Argentines believe that the Brits would not respond.

    The war cost Britain considerable money and lives, not to mention all of the South American countries boycotted their products. It was the right response, certainly not the easiest. A weak response by Britain would have encouraged other dictators to do the same to other countries and protectorates that Britain had agreements with.

  • Frank

    6 years ago

    Standing up to people that push people out of helicopters is a good thing. Too bad the School of the Americas keeps training more of them.

  • netscaper2

    6 years ago

    skeptikreep and ron erwin....ever heard the word "looooozers"?....

  • willy

    6 years ago

    Pushing people out of helicopters, glad to see you get your history lessons from hollywood.

  • Frank

    6 years ago

    We don't get a lot of defenders of the Argentine military around here, nice to have you aboard willy.

    http://www.yendor.com/vanished/junta/scilingo.html

  • willy

    6 years ago

    No, I was referring to the myths of Vietnam, did not know of this incident. Before anyone jumps on me about Vietnam google vietnam war myths. No I am not in support of how the US does things, I just like digging into the real story not hype story.

  • Frank

    6 years ago

    Ah, okay, I see now you thought I was talking about the US. Nope, I was just saying I thought the destruction of the Argentine military dictatorship was a good thing.

    My reference to the School of Americas was because that just seems to be where so many of these scum go for training.

  • Frank

    6 years ago

    By the way, good article. I've always been more interested in war stories told from the perspective of the average soldier instead of hearing about Monty and Patton et al.

    Just to add, I agree with Colin's "mission-creep" assessment. I guess we read the same books.

  • kent

    6 years ago

    I knew a Dieppe veteran very well, he was a farmer from southern Alberta, joined the Calgary Tanks, was captured at Dieppe and spend three years as a P.O.W. He was not bitter and did not question the need or the raid. He had a wife and two children when he joined, so his only motive was patriotism.

    I too joined the day I was old enough, but that was later so could not get into Aircrew, but loaded bombs onto Lancasters for a year.While many of us were lokking for adventure, there were good reasons to fight for what we beieved in, and we did.

  • RickW

    6 years ago

    Skeptikool:

    Quote:
    In the two major wars of the last century many enlisted or were called up in economically depressed times.

    http://www.mcclelland.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780771016523
    Barry Broadfoot in his book "Ten Lost Years" said it best at the end. To paraphrase: "After ten long years of virtually no help from the governments of this nation, suddenly there were clothes, shelter, and three square meals a day when you signed up for military service. Who wouldn't jump at this?"

  • RickW

    6 years ago

    PS
    The US lost in Vietnam because it wasn't fought at the end of a depression, and the suckers who were sent over there weren't desperate enough to risk life and limb for some basic comforts.

  • Colin

    6 years ago

    The US did not really lose the military war in Vietnam, interviews with retired VC generals confirmed that N Vietnam was a spent force after Tet, they threw everything into that battle they had and lost. However it was enough to change US public opinion against the war. The US lost the political war and were outmaneuvered by the VC in that respect. Had the US taken the initiative, they could have rolled up the VC and taken Hanoi or at least as far as they could go before the Chinese or Russians came to the rescue.

    Vietnam’s real lessons are to pay attention to public opinion and look after the home front. Also the policy of rotating people home instead of units was flawed. Having someone fight in the jungle on Friday and home on the streets by Monday was a recipe for problems, PTSD was not really considered an issue at that time. There were other systemic problems in the US forces from racism, the draft, leadership and equipment to name a few. The US army today is nothing like the army of the 60’s or even of the 80’s when I dealt with them.

    The draft works best for defensive armies such as Finland, Sweden or the Swiss. For an expeditionary army, it is best to have a all volunteer force. All though the British were able to win against the Communist’s in Malay with a conscripted army.

    Frank
    Glad we can agree on a few things.

    I do wonder what affect did Dieppe have on the Germans, did it make them more complacent? Or did they learn lessons from that attack that they used in Normandy?

  • RickW

    6 years ago

    colin:

    Quote:
    The US did not really lose the military war in Vietnam

    But they lost the war, and that is what counts in the end. Had Germans in WWII exhibited the same reluctance to continue that war as Americans were to continue in Vietnam, VE Day would have been sometime in '43..........

  • Colin

    6 years ago

    Actually it was the South Vietnamese that lost the war, the US pulled out approx two years before the downfall. The pictures of the helicopters were the evacuation of US citizens and friends from the embassy.

    It is because of the early pullouts in Vietnam, Somali, Lebanon and Iraq in 91 that people do not trust the US to stay. This has a major effect on peoples actions in places like Iraq, they are worried about being left high and dry if the US leaves to early.

  • RickW

    6 years ago

    Speaking of helicopters, it seems that Bell Helicopters was on the verge of bankruptcy, and the Vietnam War nicely put them on a solid footing. Perhaps the war wasn't "needed" anymore...........

  • Colin

    6 years ago

    Yes and Beijing and Moscow needed to keep their arms factories going.

    The biggest mistake the US made in Vietnam was taking the French side and ignoring Giap.

  • RickW

    6 years ago

    Seems as well that "Uncle Ho" was amenable to US support in his fight against the French, similar to Castro's overtures to the US before he jumped to Moscow.............

  • Colin

    6 years ago

    I think that the US at the time was more able to support a independent Indochina, than a new Cuba. The United Fruit company and others like it, held to much influence and did not want other to follow the lead of people like Castro. Becoming a communist helped differentiate Castro from the other dictators and likely increased his survival. He was also able to mix charisma, brutality and revolution far better than other dictators. He is certainly proved to be a survivor. Mind you it helps to knock or jail any potential rivals early in the game. It was a good thing that Che died in Bolivia, otherwise Castro would have had to arranged an accident, a dead Che is a martyr, a live Che is a threat.

    It is amazing how much influence the exiled Cuban vote plays on US policy. The blockade has likely been one of the most important factors in keeping Castro in power, without an enemy it’s hard to keep the revolution alive.

  • RickW

    6 years ago

    Quote:
    It is amazing how much influence the exiled Cuban vote plays on US policy

    I have never quite understood this quite disproportionate influence.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.