Mediacheck

Get Used to Geo-Blocking Online

The digital marketplace rewards businesses who do it, and don't expect politicians to change that.

By Michael Geist, 6 Jul 2010, TheTyee.ca

Frustrated computer user

Frustrating, yet profitable.

Related

The Internet was once viewed as a "borderless" world that had little regard for the physical location of users. That sentiment likely seems outdated today to many Canadian Internet users who have grown accustomed to clicking on links for audio or video services only to be advised that the content, site or service is not available in their area.

"Geo-blocking" has become standard practice among broadcasters, sports leagues, and music services that use technologies to identify the likely location of an Internet user in real-time and block the content in some circumstances. From World Cup broadcasts to Hulu.com (a popular U.S. video site) to Spotify (a European music service), Canadians often find themselves unable to access content and unsure who is to blame.

While some have misleadingly suggested that outdated laws are the reason behind the blocking, the reality is that geo-blocking is invariably a business issue, not a legal one. Indeed, geo-blocking occurs worldwide -- U.S. residents are similarly unable to use Spotify and are blocked from accessing the CBC's streaming coverage of the World Cup.

Rather than a reaction to older laws, the geo-blocking approach is actually an attempt to preserve an older business model, namely content licencing on a country-by-country or market-by-market approach.

Canadian broadcasters have for years purchased the exclusive rights to air popular U.S. programming in Canada. This approach led to the simultaneous substitution policies that allow Canadian broadcasters to compel cable and satellite companies to replace the U.S. broadcast of a particular show with the Canadian feed (complete with Canadian commercials).

Licence to block

As video streaming on the Internet emerged as an increasingly popular method of distribution, Canadian broadcasters began bargaining for both the over-the-air and Internet rights to U.S. programs. With those rights in hand, broadcasters streamed their own version of the programs exclusively to their Canadian audiences. This explains why Comedy Central streams programs such as The Daily Show in the U.S., but Canadian users trying to access those streams online are redirected to CTV's Comedy Network site.

The same geography-based licences arise with live sports programming and music services. World Cup matches are available on the Internet in countries around the world, yet the national broadcast rights holder (CBC in Canada, ABC/ESPN in the U.S.) limits their streams to a domestic audience.

Music services and book publishers face many of the same licencing hurdles. Apple iTunes arrived in Canada nearly two years after the U.S. edition not because of copyright laws, but rather because a new round of negotiations was needed with copyright owners to obtain the necessary approvals.

These delays continue until today, with Pandora -- a hugely popular music service -- blocked to Canadian users and Spotify's North American launch the victim of successive delays (Spotify owners have indicated they would like to launch the service simultaneously in the U.S. and Canada).

Canadian Apple iPad owners have found the same licencing limitations apply to the electronic book market. Owners of the popular device can choose from among thousands of public domain books, but the electronic book store supported by the major book publishers in the U.S. has been slow to migrate its way north to Canada.

While frustrated Canadians may be inclined to call on the government to "fix" the problem, the reality is that this is a business issue. Geo-blocking will only disappear if the business models they support give way to global approaches that make the borderless Internet a reality.  [Tyee]

7  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • CanadianLatitude

    1 year ago

    That is why I use proxies

    That is why I use proxies and ip blockers and spoofers.

  • jimgde

    1 year ago

    If it's purely a business

    If it's purely a business issue, then why don't american media companies just stream their content in Canada?

  • Booker

    1 year ago

    more money

    If it's purely a business issue, then why don't american media companies just stream their content in Canada?

    If they can make more money by licensing their content to a Canadian publisher/distributor then that's what they will do. Also, sometimes they get better attention in the Canadian market by handing it over to a Canadian company that knows this market. There are many different reasons for such arrangements, and it often benefits Canada by generating revenue and jobs within our country.

  • jimgde

    1 year ago

    but there are no

    but there are no legal/regulatory barriers to them doing so, right? that is what the article implies...if an american content owner wanted to distribute their media in canada, there is nothing to stop them from doing so (even if they can make more money by licensing to a canadian company?)

  • Booker

    1 year ago

    barriers

    There is no regulatory barrier, but their could be a rights barrier, which is a legal barrier. For example, a British publisher might sell rights to an ebook to Canada and the U.S. separately. In that case you would not be able to buy the Canadian edition from a U.S. website, and vice verse. That's a form of geo-blocking. I assume something similar occurs in other media too, such as video. Apple and Amazon have to deal with that and they seem to be able to handle it. I don't personally think this is a big issue, but maybe Geist does. I can watch Comedy Central on the Canadian site perfectly well -- I think it's probably helping to keep a Canadian in a job, and I'm pro labour.

  • snert

    1 year ago

    Geoblocking

    has been around for a long time. Primary use is for content blocking to prevent access from non subscribing countries which is fair enough but should be limited to that alone.

  • paisley

    1 year ago

    Booker

    I purchase all my music and have ordered CD's from Amazon.com because Amazon.ca does not carry the same inventory. If the CD is a Canadian musician it is usually cheaper to mail order from .ca if it is an american musician, same goes for .com. If I want to buy an MP3 via .com it is not allowed because of Canadian laws last time I checked and .ca doesn't sell MP3's. I have purchased MP3's from other Canadian sites but as soon as your hard drive crashes your out all the music you paid for because it is so heavily DRMed you can't make a back up. So for people like myself that try to make sure artists get paid for their music I'm not willing to rent Canadian purchased MP3's. So I just won't buy Canadian downloads, they have lost my business. Now I go to Wazee.org internet radio and download legally and for free non-DRM MP3's of which there are thousands to choose from. If I really like some of the bands I will order CD's from Amazon.com, the Canadian music industry can go to hell with their DRM ripoff.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.