Mediacheck

The CSIS Affair: What Were They Thinking?

Fadden evoked questions the CBC failed to ask. Like why he dropped his bombshell, and why now?

By Crawford Kilian, 25 Jun 2010, TheTyee.ca

Richard Fadden

Intelligence? CSIS chief Richard Fadden

The CBC's "inside report" on CSIS puts both institutions in a very strange light. Neither the broadcaster nor the spy agency seems to have thought through what it was doing.

The two-part series on CSIS looked like a pilot for a sequel to the late lamented Intelligence, one with the working title "Stupidity." It gave us ominous background music, faceless people walking around an ugly building, and painfully scripted exchanges between spymaster Richard Fadden and his underlings, all pretending as if the CBC cameras weren't in the room. Apparently they were worried about Somalia.

Fadden himself was the epitome of the bland bureaucrat, right down to the owlish horn-rim glasses and a face like rice pudding. A genius like Sir Alec Guinness could put such a face on George Smiley and make it the visage of modern espionage, but Fadden is clearly no genius.

Despite glimpses of multicultural recruits, Fadden's CSIS clearly relies on Canada's Anglo-Saxon bourgeoisie. We see him delivering a speech to a dinner of "security" people, all in formal evening wear and patiently listening to him drone through a summary of the Current Threats to the Realm. Clearly CSIS has modelled itself on the Ivy Leaguers who built the CIA after World War II.

Unasked questions

The questions Fadden evoked (and that the CBC failed to ask) was why he chose to take part in this exercise at all, why he chose to spin it as he did, and why he chose now, of all times, to do it.

CSIS, he told CBC's Brian Stewart, is dedicating most of its efforts to counter-terrorism. Coming on the heels of the Major Commission Report on the abject failure of CSIS to stop the destruction of Air India Flight 182, this did not reassure.

And given that terrorism has been the preferred threat since 9-11, perhaps it has lost its ability to stampede the public into spending enough on renditions, subsidies to Syrian torture experts, and the methodical breaking of treaties to which Canada is a signatory.

So espionage, Fadden told us, is the Next Big Threat. Spies are more active now, he claimed, than at any time since the Cold War, and maybe even the KGB in its heyday wasn't as assiduous as some current operators. So CSIS, Fadden said, would need more money for counter-espionage. And maybe start its own external espionage activities.

The yellow peril and homage to Joe McCarthy

Then he dropped his bombshell about "agents of influence" right in the lap of Peter Mansbridge. Some elected municipal officials in B.C., he said, were under the control of foreign powers. So were cabinet officers in two unnamed provinces. They were evidently members of ethnic minorities, manipulated by spies from the old country -- most likely China.

This was strikingly reminiscent of Senator Joe McCarthy's famous 1950 announcement of 205 confirmed Communists working in the U.S. State Department: vague enough to be scary, specific enough to sound credible.

But 2010 isn't 1950. Within a few hours, everyone from Gordon Campbell on down had damned and blasted Fadden's charges. Fadden had backtracked on his claim and said CSIS would have nothing further to say about these internal menaces.

Still, Fadden and his CBC interviewers have raised questions that deserve answers.

First, what did Fadden think he was going to achieve? Would Canadians flood their MPs with anxious emails, demanding more money for CSIS? Had the Harper government given him a discreet go-ahead? And if it had not, why did he think Harper would let his top spymaster blather away on TV about the threat of foreign spies and their domestic stooges?

Second, why had the CBC gone along with CSIS? Perhaps the full interviews it conducted with Fadden might have been more rigorous, but in what we saw, neither Stewart nor Mansbridge seriously challenged Fadden's assertions. They didn't ask him why he was suddenly making himself available. They didn't question his claims about intensified espionage (or why our other spy agencies like the Communications Security Establishment can't handle them).

The real agents of influence

Perhaps the CBC was trying to do the government a favour, to show the Conservatives that it's not the Liberal propaganda service it's supposed to be. But if Fadden wasn't operating with Harper's blessing, the CBC has only got itself into more trouble.

The whole uproar has embarrassed all concerned, but it's brought up some points worth discussing. Of course we're being spied on. And of course the country is full of agents of influence. Most of them are agents promoting the interests of the United States, along with the interests of Britain, France and Israel. A few are agents of China, Japan, India, Pakistan, and no doubt Afghanistan.

They're not just city councillors or MLAs; they're journalists, academics, corporate executives, and Ottawa mandarins. Promoting the interests of such foreign powers has paid off handsomely for them, and surely they believe they also serve Canada's interests.

So the CSIS affair has raised some real issues. But I don't think that was Richard Fadden's intention. Nor was it the CBC's intention. The likeliest outcome of this matter? The prompt and vengeful appointment of Richard Fadden to the presidency of the CBC.  [Tyee]

28  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Dr Alexander

    1 year ago

    I think Richard Fadden did the right thing.

    It is about time we REALLY examined every person, every country and every "group" that seems to have the ear and marionette strings of our federal, provincial and civic politicians.

    The monies and influence of the above-mentioned usurpers undermine the democracy that we live in.

    In addition, we must pay more attention to our various politicians who sometimes seemingly support other countries or groups whose interests or actions run counter to our own.

    My yardstick is simple: Canada come first.

  • fanshaw

    1 year ago

    Harper plays the security card.

    Mr. Fadden still has his job, so obviously he had the PM's blessing. I believe Mr. Harper's response to this story was, "We're aware of all this, it's no biggie." So this is pure politics, and not a bad thing to have out there as we waste a billion on security for Gs 8&20.

  • lynn

    1 year ago

    Layer Cake

    Good article, Mr. Kilian.

    It is interesting what Mr. Fadden has both chosen to highlight.... and what he has chosen to ignore.

    In regard to that pointedly pointed finger being waved at BC municipal leaders and members of cabinet.... and not they are not complicit or blameless in their susceptibility to both co-option and influence....

    But .....if you have been following BC politics, you will know municipalities have been "relieved" of all their powers of determination through sly legislation brought in by the Campbell BCLiberals eg. "The Significant Projects Streamlining Act" - to mention only one highly "influential" one.

    And BC cabinet ministers, too, have been similarly "relieved".....note that infamous memo sent out to them in Campbell's early days that made very clear that Gordon Campbell and his "premier-appointed" Chief of Staff, Martyn Brown would be running the show.

    So it was truly funny stuff watching Mr. Campbell's "outrage" at Mr. Fadden's so-called revelations over influence.

    Influence is a many-tiered cake.

    Mr. Fadden, it seems, would prefer to focus on anything but the top tier. So the bottom layers, poor things, get eaten first....and the top layers gets all the protective icing. And like the top of a wedding cake they are preserved and protected and hidden away for "safe" keeping.

    Somehooooo....sorry...( as Basil Fawlty says "don't mention the war"), it brings the BC Rail Corruption Trial to mind where all the focus has been conveniently off-loaded onto those few who allegedly dared to take the bribe.... while a hard icing of obfuscation has served to conceal and disguise not only those who allegedly offered the bribe but "especially" those special main players who actually planned... and encouraged...and created this political culture of bribery.

    If you've ever played Monopoly, you'll know the most advantageous and influential card in the deck. And these special few must have it....in spades.

  • Jeffrey J.

    1 year ago

    Wheels Within Wheels Within Wheels

    Like many clandestine secret services before ours (SS, KGB, CIA, NSA etc etc), CSIS has succumbed to the inevitable 'wheels within wheels within wheels' phenomenon, where layer after layer of strategy and secrecy result in everyone involved getting tangled up in their own anchor chains.

    In non-democratic societies of the past, ruled by elites over peasants who were not allowed to read or write, you could get away with it. But with a still vibrant citizenry who can spot deception a mile away, you can't.

    This is a classic case of plain manipulation by CSIS, authorized by their political masters, to create fake enemies and issues, while the real perpetrator destroying Canada is in 'plain site', which would be Harper et al, the neocons helping to dismantle Canada.

    GREAT coverage.

  • 99thDimension

    1 year ago

    CSIS FADDEN the enemy within

    CBC NewsWorld and the National is rightwing fare and has been since Day 1.
    CBC Radio overall is leftwing heady stuff sans Rex Murphy on Sunday.
    People who like to think are drawn to leftwing fare, people who like to react are drawn to rightwing fare.

    Fadden's game was well played the message was for the Federal Conservative, Liberals and Green parties all three should be outlawed on all levels.

    Weak minded politicians like Robertson of Vancouver
    are easily manipulated and as such should be removed asap. Ditto for all of the BC Liberals and the current leader of the NDP Carole James and the party machine around her.

    Calgary University needs to be raided and e-mails and files seized [UNVERIFIED ALLEGATION REMOVED. -MODERATOR].

    You brought up 9/11 on the terror side but 9/11 was done for the political side and terror is a very small part of the whole political plan.

    AXIOM; Those who can not remember the past are CONDEMNED to repeat it. Harper, Iggy and May are creatures from the past, different names same game.

    Thank you Mr Fadden Canada 1st.

  • realisticman

    1 year ago

    Why Now?

    If this story and interview was important then why did the CBC keep it hidden until the day before the Chinese President arrived in Canada?

    "The timing of the CBC interview was not Mr. Fadden’s choice. This spring, CBC approached him to repeat remarks he had made at a private, but videotaped, speech at the Royal Canadian Military Institute. The public broadcaster kept the interview in its back pocket until it broadcast the exclusive this week. ..."

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/csis-directors-future-in-doubt-as-politicians-decry-remarks/article1615583/

    Someone at the CBC knew exactly what they were up to.

  • lynn

    1 year ago

    ``....tangled up in their own anchor chain.``

    Quote: ``...where layer after layer of strategy and secrecy result in everyone involved getting tangled up in their own anchor chain.``

    So very well said, Jeffrey J.

    It certainly reveals what constitutes true freedom.

  • John Carten

    1 year ago

    Was CSIS Targeting Premier Gordon Campbell?

    The timing of this announcement, shortly after Premier Campbell's secret visit to the Bilderberg Club meeting in Spain, is a good reason to think that CSIS Director Fadden's target may have been British Columbia Premier, Gordon Campbell.

    Premier Campbell has sold many of British Columbia's public assets to foreign corporations since he became Premier. Does anyone remember Accenture located in Bermuda or Maximus Inc. located in Reston, Virginia?

    For the record, Bermuda, England and the United States are foreign countries.

    Premier Campbell also takes an extraordinary number of visits to foreign countries for a provincial Premier whose primary obligations and responsibilities should be public health, public education and public highways and not the making of promises to foreign business leaders behind closed doors as he appears to have done in Spain.

    Premier Campbell's reaction to Fadden's comments is extremely peculiar and unique among the Premiers EDITED FOR LEGAL CONCERNS. TYEE MODERATOR

  • realisticman

    1 year ago

    Not Peculiar or Unique at all

    Campbell's comments are in line with NDP Premier Dexter's.

    "CSIS remarks ‘very disturbing’, says premier
    ALEX BOUTILIER
    FOR METRO HALIFAX
    June 25, 2010 12:41 a.m.

    Recent comments by CSIS director Richard Fadden hearken back to Cold War-era paranoia, says Nova Scotia’s premier. Premier Darrell Dexter said Fadden’s allegation that some provincial and municipal politicians in Canada are under the influence of foreign government’s is “very disturbing” and “xenophobic.”

    “It had a kind of xenophobic feel to it that hearkens back to the McCarthy-era where you imply that citizens, because of the fact that they may be new Canadians or first-generation Canadians, are not as loyal to the country as long-established Canadians.”

    Fadden set off a media storm when he made the allegations in an interview with CBC on Tuesday. He has since attempted to distance himself from the allegations, offering a clarification on Wednesday.

    But Dexter said he believes Fadden owes the public — and governments — an explanation."

    http://www.metronews.ca/halifax/Local/article/562479--csis-remarks-very-disturbing-says-premier

    http://thechronicleherald.ca/NovaScotia/1188944.html

  • Bobby Peru

    1 year ago

    A Perfect Spy

    Fadden reminds me of the Matt Damon character in the brilliant movie "The Good Shephard"; in a key scene Damon meets the mobster Joe Palmi, played by Joe Pesci. In a moment of racial and social perspective, Pesci asks Damon, "The blacks have their music, we Italians have our families. What do you WASPs have?"

    Damon's facial expression doesn't change and he answers, "You people are just guests in our country."

    I guess that belief is what underpins what Fadden was implying. Despite all the talk about cultural mosaics and 'making nice' the Canadian way, the core of the power structure that keeps this country together and ensures its security is Anglo-Saxon (and based in Ottawa and Toronto). The rest of the non-Anglos are only visitors.

    The real issue here isn't what Fadden said. Spy chiefs aren't prone to running off at the mouth by accident. Indeed, his remarks were probably made on purpose to float a balloon for all of us to see, to put their adversaries on notice, to scare the populace. He bypassed the govt's usual security channels and dropped his accusations right on national television. Maybe the rest of the govt bureaucracy didn't take him seriously. Super bureaucrats like Fadden rarely work outside the system by taking political stances and risking their jobs.

    Perhaps his intent was to incite a witch hunt among the population pitting race against race. Look at many of the local blogs and you'll find many white people complaining about the out of control immigration of people who do not share traditional Canadian values. Old Canada is being consumed by a New Canada that none of us can understand. Maybe Fadden sought to tap into that vein of discontent.

    When a spymaster plays his hand, the move is rarely decipherable at first glance. Motive, intent and consequence are trapped in a wilderness of mirrors.

  • enzojeanb

    1 year ago

    and what of CBC

    Again in this as in other recent "documentary" pieces CBC fails at minimal investigative journalism. For fear of govnt backlash ? Most probably... Some of them probably remember how Mulroney slashed their budgets in the early 90s after they had roughed him up a couple of times as prime minister. Which explains why they have spent so much time rehashing the Mulroney airbus story over the years, softly settling score. The only time they get a bit rough is when they pursue some Joe who screwed people about their retirement money. No risk in that. But when it comes to actually be something else that the mouth piece of canadian "whoever is in power at the time". They fail us all. Rex Murphy's weekly indignation about parliament does not a critical media make.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    Dr. A & R/Man Reveal McFadden's Real Intent

    Namely, to sow discord amongst the general population, so that we begin looking askance at our neigbours - not so dissimilar to the Hitlerian-spy-on-your-neigbours.

    The reasons? Well for one, it a lazy way to gather information on local citizenry. And two, a divided citizenry is much easier to "keep in line". Every (successful) banana republic despot knows this.

  • pwillis

    1 year ago

    Huh? Who are the real spies....?

    Why would CSIS focus primarily on foreign influence only from a minority perspective? There is more influence coming from U.S. and Europe than anywhere else. The reality here is that CSIS is controlled by whom-ever Canada's supposed *partners* in intelligence are. A system which doesn't provide very good intelligence at all.

    If Canada needs intelligence, instead of cozying up and relying on N.A.T.O. for intelligence, CSIS should be heavily filtering intelligence provided by partner sources and mostly relying on their own data collection. This is because, from the standpoint of external control, supplying misinformation is one of the best forms of political control known. It's easier to control nations if one has the listening ear of their security organizations and diplomats. Can we count on our partners to provide good intelligence? Not really; only when it suits their own agendas.

    Does Canada really need a spy agency? No. The reality is that at almost every occasion where CSIS could have made a difference it has botched the job or seriously missed the point.

    The very concept of political espionage is obsolete. Governments do not really manage secrets outside the domains of military operations and stored personal information of citizens. In the case of citizen information, anything other than name, address and phone number are normally outdated or incorrect anyway. Canadian databases a full of unfiltered errors, misinformation, hearsay and outright libel.

    Real espionage is economic and corporate. Governments can neither study, curtail, nor stop these types of spying. That is the responsibility of the businesses involved. Thus the use of public funds to somehow effect a change in this domain are completely wasted.

    Returning once again to the relationship of Canada's intelligence infrastructure and partners; If it is impossible for CSIS to actually provide useful intelligence regarding external and corporate espionage threats to business and the public at large, what then is the true role of intelligence in Canada?
    The fact is intelligence in Canada is ALL about collecting information, however erroeous, about our own citizens and disseminating that information to our intelligence our 'partners' around the world via N.A.T.O., Interpol, C.P.I.C., etc..

    Global business (the elite wealthy), police, and anyone else in the club are given carte blanche with your information every day.

    The reality is CSIS, and most Canadian databases, are the spies that the citizens of Canada really need to worry about. If they were not storing your information you, the citizen, would not need to worry.

  • dave49

    1 year ago

    Industrial espionage

    A friend in Ottawa alerted me to this story. He said that industrial espionage is rampant in Canada. The more 'legitimate' forms happen when Canadian manufacturers off-shore production to China. In short order, several brands of knock-offs, based on copied designs, will appear in the Canadian market at a fraction of the price. Apparently Black and Decker is getting hammered by this.

    I talked to someone who is trying to sell various products to China. He met the regional manager of one of the (government-controlled) banks that are the powerhouses behind China's rapid growth. He was told China does not want to develop technology, but to copy and make existing designs cheaper.

    China is also picking up technologies as high-tech ventures here go under. They will step in and buy all the intellectual property rights for peanuts. Look up VRB Power Systems.

    Also, stories a few years back relating to the Chinese persecution of Falun Gong members revealed a large and powerful network of Chinese spies operating in this country. If they can keep close watch on dissidents abroad, they surely have the spy machinery in place to accomplish other goals.

    My friend viewed the Fadden admission as a warning shot, letting it known that we are aware of them.

  • spartikus

    1 year ago

    CBC News...

    ...might not be "leftwing", but you have to wonder with the Tories musing on our public broadcaster's future if this was not timed to create maximum embarrassment for Harper.

    If Fadden was trying to fire a warning shot, then I can tell you his counterpart in Beijing isn't losing any sleep, if they aren't laughing.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    dave40

    Quote:
    The more 'legitimate'[espionage] forms happen when Canadian manufacturers off-shore production to China. In short order, several brands of knock-offs, based on copied designs, will appear in the Canadian market at a fraction of the price

    I kinda figure that, if Cancuck manufacturers want to offshore, then they have to be prepared this kind of blowback. Or are they so naive to think it couldn't happen to them (like a tanker mishap just can't happen in Canada)?

  • Jerry Munro

    1 year ago

    Which I Refuse to Believe...

    "In addition, we must pay more attention to our various politicians who sometimes seemingly support other countries or groups whose interests or actions run counter to our own.

    My yardstick is simple: Canada come first."

    And we need to lay that yardstick up against our own US Empire wannabes at all levels of business and governance in this country and, in my opinion, from the evidence of their endless apologetics, many who frequent this site from time to time. The politicians right now, we all know. But it is these in our midst who are the nation's real "problem children".

    As for the CBC, which I once loved as a reflection of a nascent independent spirit and world view in Canadians, it has become just another official "State Media" reflecting the ruling class and "serving political elite" interest in serving, and integrating itself into the US Empire system.

    Which reminds me that we have two more Canadians killed serving the US Empire Cause in Afghanistan today. Sad. But if you're going to serve the US Empire cause, you better be prepared to pay the ultimate price.

    And no, it is not true anybody is going to remember them forever. In a hundred years, these average working class "grunts", or "pongoes" as we used to be called, serving The Empire in Afghanistan today, will just be nobodies like the rest of us. Even the faithful at the annual cenotaph parades will have moved on to new war dead, and these guys will be about as remembered as those who fell on the Plains of Abraham. That is, assuming that capitalism still exists, fighting its endless imperialist wars in one impoverished land or another. Which I refuse to believe.

  • x4estworker

    1 year ago

    Foreign Spies a Reality

    It is unfortunate that Canada has some naive and/or willfully blind political leaders who seem to think that any accusation that a foreign government is influencing or attempting to influence a Canadian politician is somehow racist or xenophobic.

    I have no doubt that CSIS Director Richard Fadden is absolutely right to raise the issue and no doubt has evidence to support his conclusions. Governments like China and Russia have been spying on Canadian technology companies for years. Israel has used fake Canadian passports to carry out operations by its Mossad intelligence agency. There are probably any number of reasons why foreign governments would want to have Canadian politicians in their back pockets.

    Canadian politicians should never dismiss such accusations from the head of a Canadian intelligence agency simply to suck up to a particular ethnic vote.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    x4estworker

    You forgot one major foregn power..........

  • samuidave (not verified)

    1 year ago

    Spying is a everyday pastime

    around the world -- political, industrial and commercial. The release by CSIS of this non-information can only have been done for one reason: to strike a little more fear and suspicion into the hearts of the masses; the standard, long-serving ploy of governments.

    A fearful nation is a compliant people.

    Fear of God.
    Fear of Communism.
    Fear of Terrorism.
    Fear of Drug Lords.
    Fear of Nigerian Money Scammers.
    Fear of Invasion.
    Fear of Foreign Foods.
    Fear of the Socialists.
    Fear of the Evil-Doers.
    Fear of Suspicious Boxes.
    Fear of Organized Criminals.
    Fear of the Flu.
    Fear of Unions.
    Fear of Foreigners.
    Fear of Not Fitting In.
    Fear of Dissent.
    Fear of ...

    Enough 'fear' to legitimate why the government needs to operate without oversight defending our national security, planning how it is going to rob the nation and its people one more time through boom, bust or war.

  • Jerry Munro

    1 year ago

    Samuidave...

    "Enough 'fear' to legitimate why the government needs to operate without oversight defending our national security, planning how it is going to rob the nation and its people one more time through boom, bust or war." wrote samuidave.

    You got it, brother.

    No more needs to be said, certainly by me.

  • Ramone

    1 year ago

    Blind trust can be dangerous

    "I have no doubt that CSIS Director Richard Fadden is absolutely right to raise the issue and no doubt has evidence to support his conclusions."

    No doubt, eh?

    CSIS, big business and our corporate sponsored government loves you.

  • Name

    1 year ago

    Interesting questions indeed...

    ...and don't we all love a glimpse of intrigue.

    I do think that, in light of BC's extremely lax municipal financing laws, that Fadden's questions about external governments buying influence are legitimate, although this is probably a very soft form of influence - one that's more about cultivating potentially useful long-term friendships, rather than the stealing secrets stuff of spy novels.

    But that is just the tip of a much larger iceberg that's by no means limited to China or foreign governments. The influence bought by local, BC-based and international corporations (and to a lesser extent unions) through gifts, hospitality, political donations and probably outright bribes in some cases is a very large, very insidious and very real threat. It's one that visibly corrupts local and provincial governance and one that has shaped Canada from the time Europeans first arrived here.

  • x4estworker

    1 year ago

    Are you kidding, Ramone???

    There is plenty of evidence around in the public domain tying China, Russia, Israel, and yes, even the United States to taking advantage of Canada in one way or another.

    For a really prime example of how easily manipulated and dumb Canadian politicians can be, just look at the number of federal and provincial politicians actively supporting the Sikh separatist groups who are tied to the Air India bombing. At various times, some very prominent federal and provincial politicians openly supported these groups at the same time CSIS and the RCMP were linking these groups to the Air India bombing. Unfortunately, those same two agencies screwed up the investigation and so no one was ever convicted, except for Reyat.

    Read Vancouver's Sun reporter Kim Bolan’s book about the Air India conspiracy and bombing, “Loss of Faith”. She names names and gives details, and has never been sued over the content of the book.

    While that situation is something different from what the current CSIS chief was talking about, it does show that some Canadian politicians will go to great lengths to win favor with certain ethnic minorities without bothering to consider the evidence. The recent criticism of the CSIS chief by Gordon Campbell and Premier Dexter of Nova Scotia are prime examples.

  • Bob Watts

    1 year ago

    Back to the Future.

    Ah! A taste of the future conservative police state, right wing Christians, doing what's best for us sinners! No Thanks.
    How about we act like 911 never happened and pretend the Right Wing Conservative Muslims are not in control of the planet!
    The good old days, crossing the boarder for lunch with the only answering where do you live, getting on a plane with no more than a smile and have a great vacation. Soldiers that where peace keepers.
    At least I grew up in real freedom.
    Time for more drugs, to forget and dream of the past....

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Why didn't the CBC address

    Why didn't the CBC address the "elephant in the living room?" Fadden referred to China and a country in the Middle East. Any reasonably informed Canadian knows full well that Harper and his minions are loyal servants of Israel and its Canadian lobby. Not only do they (and the Liberals, to a slightly lesser extent) ignore the well documented war crimes and crimes against humanity Israel is accused of by several respected international human rights group and the Goldstone Report, they also praise Israel for using "restraint."
    As Fadden also noted, Canadian politicians are given free trips to certain countries which opens the door to influence buying. If memory serves, Israel leads in this category by a large margin. Israel has already stolen Canadian passports in order to carry out an assassination attempt in Jordan some time back and of course its recent Dubai assassination of a Palestinian in Dubai involved the theft of passports from many nations. I for one, want CSIS to keep a very close eye on Israeli operatives in this country.

  • Gary Cameron

    1 year ago

    Spies are us

    >>Perhaps the CBC was trying to do the government a favour, to show the Conservatives that it's not the Liberal propaganda service it's supposed to be.<<

    I think it's safe to say that none of us will live long enough to witness the CBC doing any favors for the Conservatives!

    With respect to our knowledge of contemporary espionage, I think it's also safe to state (if I may steal a quote from the left's favorite bête noire, Don Rumsfeld): "there are known "knowns." There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know."

    I suspect Fadden was probably firing a shot across the bows of a country (Let's refer to them as "The-country-which-must-not-be-named") to warn them in a friendly Canadian way that they have crossed the line recently, but of course that's only a guess on my part.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/americas/three-alleged-russian-spies-posed-as-canadians-us-government/article1621833/

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Personally

    Personally, I'm a lot less concerned about China's influence on Canadian politicians than I am about the string pullers and fellow travelers from Great Britain and the United States who seem to have Pee Wee's and Gordon's attention all the time...Maybe CSIS was talking about them?

    Many of these characters even 'pretend' to be loyal Canadians while hanging onto their papers from their 'homeland' - they make a 'fifth column' to really be concerned about.

    Perhaps CSIS has a file on Tom FLANAGAN - I recommend they start one if they haven't.

    http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/the-man-behind-stephen-harper-tom-flanagan/

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.