Mediacheck

Plug in Our Digital TV!

US is two years ahead on switch over. How that hurts Canadians.

By Michael Geist, 17 Feb 2009, TheTyee.ca

old-tv.png

Clinging to obsolescence?

Starting this week, hundreds of U.S. television stations plan to shut down their analog broadcasts as they complete the transition to digital over-the-air broadcasts. While the U.S. had planned for a nationwide change this month, last-minute legislation has delayed the full mandatory transition until mid-June.

The U.S. experience to date highlights what should be a major concern for Canada -- the transition from analog to digital broadcasts is years behind the U.S. with virtually no industry or government support. This sounds like a purely technical issue, yet the policy implications of that transition will have a profound effect on both the national broadcast and telecom landscape.

The basic notion of the transition is fairly straightforward. For decades, Canadian broadcasters have used spectrum to transmit over-the-air analog broadcast signals. Before the widespread use of cable and satellite, many Canadians used antennae -- "rabbit ears" -- to access those broadcast signals. Today, approximately 10 percent of Canadians still rely on over-the-air television signals.

Early in the next decade, Canadian broadcasters are scheduled to complete the switch from analog to digital broadcasts. The shift to digital brings several advantages including better image and sound quality as well as more efficient use of spectrum that will open the door to new telecom services.

US two years ahead of Canada

The shift will require some significant investments, however, since broadcasters must phase out their analog transmitters in favour of new digital equipment. Regulators first hoped that broadcasters would voluntarily make the switch. In response to concerns that North American broadcasters were moving too slowly (several European countries have already transitioned from analog to digital), both the United States and Canada established mandatory deadlines under which the change must be completed.

While Canada and the U.S. negotiated an agreement on the digital television transition in 2000, the U.S. is now over two years ahead of Canada, with their mandatory transition set for June 12, 2009. By contrast, the Canadian deadline is August 31, 2011 (there are some exceptions for northern and remote communities).

Notwithstanding the longer Canadian phase-in period, there are mounting concerns that Canadian broadcasters will not be ready in time. Last year, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Chair Konrad von Finckenstein delivered a stinging rebuke to the broadcasters, noting the paucity of digital transmitters in Canada and lamenting that "so far, the industry has not shown the sense of urgency that I think is called for right now."

Given the difficult economic climate, Canadian broadcasters are likely to lobby Industry Minister Tony Clement heavily for a deferral of the digital transition.

The shift will also have implications for Canadian consumers, who may need new equipment since televisions that do not feature a digital tuner will require a special set-top box in order to view the over-the-air digital signals. This additional cost could affect lower-income Canadians, who are also more likely to rely on the over-the-air signals rather than cable or satellite services.

US consumers get $1.5 billion in support

U.S. lawmakers have established a plan to support those in need of the digital equipment with a coupon program that subsidizes the cost. The program does not come cheap, with US$1.5 billion set aside to cover the cost of the program. At the moment, there are no similar plans in Canada. The CRTC has made it clear that consumer subsidies fall outside its statutory mandate and last week Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore told a House of Commons committee that there were no government plans to establish a consumer program.

While the digital transition may result in some challenges for broadcasters, the implications are even greater for telecommunications since an important by-product of the transition will be that much of the spectrum currently used by broadcasters for analog broadcasts will be freed up for other uses.

Next week's column will examine the potential for dramatic new uses of spectrum -- including more open networks and unlicensed "white spaces" that could foster new innovation and deliver wireless broadband services.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

5  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • dorothy

    3 years ago

    Someone please explain to me

    "..stinging rebuke to the broadcasters, noting the paucity of digital transmitters in Canada and lamenting that "so far, the industry has not shown the sense of urgency that I think is called for right now."

    Where's the fire? What are we supposed to run for? I can see we might want to do this sometime, but tell me why 'sometime' is being interpreted as 'now, or else'.

  • alive

    3 years ago

    where will it end?

    What is happening is one more example of greed!

    It has no doubt been a thorn in the side of business that people could get their TV programs for free.

    Little by little we will loose whatever has been free. Who knows, when pollution increases, we will no doubt see attempts at selling "clean air" for us to breathe.

  • Chris H

    3 years ago

    TV - It makes life worth living?

    Access to TV has been the one thing that has pacified the working poor. Maybe no TV would actually wake people up to the huge discrepencies there are in wealth distribution in North America. Why do you think the government is so interested in making sure everyone can have it? They sure don't care if everyone can afford other forms of electronics (such as cell phones).

  • Hobbs

    3 years ago

    alive - digital tv can still be 'free'

    From what I've read, you can use an antennae to get over-the-air digital TV. With a newer TV (bought since 2007-ish, or a converter box) and an antenna, TV will still be free. Lots of good info on which stations are broadcasting and how to pull them in at this link.

    http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=81

    A small investment and there'll be no need to give the big bad corporations a bunch of money every month, unless you want more channels.

  • dave49

    3 years ago

    Who takes the risk?

    Normally in matters like this, it is the public sector that takes such risks to push a new technology. Where is the CBC in all this? Ignored and underfunded since Mulroney was in power. Successive governments, whether Liberal or Conservative, have continued the rundown of the CBC.

    One of the complaints a few years ago was that while Canada's private broadcasters had moved to stereo audio, CBC was still mono (and I believe still is).

    It also has not helped that in picking digital broadcasting standards we ignored the 300 pound gorilla to the south of us and chose a European standard for digital radio. As a result, digital radio has been a complete non-starter in Canada.

    While some may see our delay on the digital transition as cautious, we are again missing the boat. Nortel WAS a world leader, but look where it is now. We Canadians have to stop telling ourselves we are so wonderful. Let's get out and do stuff to prove we are forward-thinking. We are devolving into a nation of impression spinners and dupes who soak up all the spin.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.