Mediacheck

A Tyee Series

Who Trusts Their Media?

Hint: France is a nice place to be a journalist.

By Angus Reid, 6 Jun 2006, TheTyee.ca

Stephen Harper has been scrapping with the media of late and Canadians looking on don't seem to be shedding a collective tear for the press corps. Which raises the question of how much trust people have in the media, here and elsewhere. And whether they believe the media have too much influence or too little.

WHERE THE PRESS RANKS IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES

In Canada, fire fighters, nurses and farmers traditionally top the trust rankings. Journalists are in the middle of the pack, with 49 per cent. Politicians rarely hit the 15 per cent mark. For more on this, click here.

In Britain, the media is the message. Sixty-three per cent of respondents think television newsreaders tell the truth, but journalists are last, with 16 per cent -- even lower than politicians and government ministers. For more on this, click here.

In the United States, following months of questions over the Iraq war and leaks from the White House, 50 per cent of respondents thought news organizations were being fair to the Bush administration. For more on this, click here.

In the U.S., a poll conducted in April found that only three per cent of respondents fully trust Congress, and 11 per cent feel the same way about the media. For more on this, click here.

In Israel, the order is very clear. The media is in third place, behind the Israeli Defence Forces and the Supreme Court, but much higher than the Knesset and political parties. For more on this, click here.

In Mexico, universities, the Catholic Church, the Army, and the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) -- Mexico's Elections Canada -- are the only institutions that outrank the media. Politicians, police and labour unions are way behind. For more on this, click here.

Nicaragua, with former president Arnoldo Alemán under house arrest for fraud, money laundering and embezzlement, places the church as the most important entity. The media is second. Curiously, the Supreme Court is at the bottom of the list. For more on this, click here.

In France, almost nine out of ten respondents express positive views on journalists. For more on this, click here.

HOW THE PUBLIC SEES POLITICIANS VS. MEDIA

In Poland, the leader of the governing party made some particularly harsh remarks this year. Jaroslaw Kaczynski -- the brother of the country's current president -- said there were "no free and independent media outlets" in Poland. Only 25 per cent of respondents agreed with his assessment. For more on this, click here.

Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra has been called the "Asian Berlusconi" for finding a way to keep his media empire and serve as head of government. When he sold his family's shares for $1.88 billion U.S., the public urged him to donate some funds for social projects. For more on this, click here.

In New Zealand, the media and the public have joined to ask for changes in the outdated rules that are in place during parliamentary sessions. The efforts have been futile. For more on this, click here.

TrendWatch runs twice monthly exclusively on The Tyee. The series shares the global scan of Angus Reid Consultants, Vancouver-based leaders in public opinion analysis.

Related stories in The Tyee: Dominic Ali wrote the book on educating media-savvy kids, Tyee editors David Beers and Charles Campbell shared with Canadian senators some ideas for bolstering independent media, and SFU communications professor Donald Gutstein's media criticism column is among The Tyee's most popular features.  [Tyee]

4  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Jack's

    5 years ago

    Comments on "Who Trusts Their Media?"

    Looks like Globally, the Politicians have rightfully claimed their place as the least trustworthy...

    Which will it be? A free country with untrustworthy politicians or a dictatorship with an honest dictator?

  • garhane

    5 years ago

    What I have found is that it is one's own presumptions that lead to belief in statements that are not true. Indeed they are often completely at odds with what is real and intended to mislead. Disinfomation, CIA scripting, PR, advocacy, there are any number of descriptive terms.
    For example many people would like to get the "inside dope" on a stuatlon and will assume they are getting it from a particular source, such as, someone who writes the kind of stuff they like, or tending to confirm their views in a large way, or tending to ridicule views and people they don't like, and so on. What is the likelihood that you will ever see in the press, the blogs, the truth about any large or complex situation. I think that would be: none.
    Then there the strategic writers and bloggers who jump off from some theory of society that involves a secret or at least private group who dominate and arrange affairs. I think there are such groups but again the liklihood that you will see their schemes clearly revealed is zero, and in most case the writers will be pointing in the wrong direction because they are limited or because they are paid.
    Maybe it would be productive to work up a list of hazard signs, like: Do not believe one word or what you see in a website or blog if ........and here add your own favorite experilence of being hoodwinked.

    And the give aways are not all that hard to find, such as:
    why would you expect some person in a far off place to state their intimate political experience and expose themselves to the killers around them; or , who gains from this piece actually; or is it known that people are paid to say such things as you find in a piece; or how come a simple private person (so it says) has all this really sophisticad technology and is able to write up all kinds of stuff that is original, every day and so on.
    It could be very helpful and might lead to a set of handy rules for dipping into media. I know in trade union affairs, you always want to know who is the bosses stooge in meetings not to throw them out but to watch what they say so that when you are in some doubt about what to do on some issue you can listen to the stooge then go the other way and have a really good chance of being right.

  • Jack's

    5 years ago

    garhane...

    Very interesting bit of psychology. Hope I can remember it next time I'm angry about a media subject.

  • kent

    5 years ago

    I'll choose the benevolent dictator, as long as it is me.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.