Mediacheck

A Tyee Series

Wanna Jam?

Habitat Jam, that is, an online prelude to the World Urban Forum.

By Dorothy Bartoszewski, 2 Dec 2005, TheTyee.ca

newDelhi

"We're all tired of words. What we want is commitment -- action, not promises."

That's what a dewy Margaret Trudeau told her audience at the first-ever Habitat Forum in Vancouver in 1976, where she protested for clean water.

Nearly thirty years later, Ms. Trudeau seems to have changed her mind about being tired of words.

Ms. Trudeau is, once again, participating in the forum. (It's now called the World Urban Forum and will convene in Vancouver in June.)

Once again she's focused on the issue of clean water.

But first, Ms. Trudeau will, herself, be immersed in a super-sized torrent of words meant to set the stage for the World Urban Forum. That conversation, called the Habitat Jam, is happening online from December 1 to 3, 2005, and there is still time for you to register to take part.

Let's talk

While it may be democratic and accessible, Charles Kelly, Habitat Jam's organizer and the commissioner-general of the upcoming World Urban Forum, is quick to point out that Habitat Jam is not a blog.

The Habitat Jam website describes it this way: "During the Jam, you can read what others have to say, introduce new ideas or respond to someone else's comments. You can sort through all the information presented to find the most relevant topic for you. You can participate in any or all of the seven Jam forums. You can present research, share your ideas, discuss specific solutions, offer examples of programs that work well, collaborate on new ideas, challenge the status quo, and more. You can safely send emails to other JAM participants and invite participants to email you while protecting your privacy. You can also invite new people to join the JAM."

Kelly's description of the Jam sounds more like a massive improvised musical work played mostly by amateur musicians, loosely conducted by a multitude of mini-conductors.

Moderated democracy

"Hundreds of facilitators will be participating to stimulate dialogue, and six hundred experts on the topics will be adding input and reacting to the discussion," says Kelly.

At the same time, there will be an ongoing computer analysis of discussion using a groundbreaking process developed by IBM. Facilitators will be able to see what the hot topics are, and also help participants link to related discussions in other subject areas, creating new linkages and cross-fertilization.

But that's just the first stage of the project. While the Jam is in process, facilitators will be tracking ideas they believe to be "actionable." Once the Jam is over, those ideas will be analyzed and distilled into two or three hundred of the "best" actionable ideas, which will be used to help refine the agenda of the World Urban Forum. A condensed version of the Jam and the actionable ideas it generated will be available on both the Habitat Jam and World Urban Forum websites.

"It's a very horizontal experience and free for any citizen who has access to the Internet," says Kelly, although he also admits the vast majority of the world's population -- and those disproportionately negatively affected by urbanization -- are also those least likely to have that Internet access. Furthermore, Habitat Jam will be conducted in English, with parallel Spanish and French chatrooms, leaving an enormous part of the globe's population out of the conversation even if they have Internet access.

The well connected

But Kelly points to initiatives Habitat Jam has taken to improve access for the underprivileged. "Four or five of the presidents of the International Association of Shack and Slum Dwellers are going to be moderators. We've organized participation for 500 people from a slum in Delhi, and there will be talk shows happening in Brazil on these topics where the discussion will be transcribed and added into the Jam."

Furthermore, Kelly sees age as a bigger barrier to participation than other factors. "Kids are text messaging all over the place in Africa," says Kelly. "It's the forty-year-olds who are scared of technology. The young people are whom we need to reach anyway. We need the next generation, the ones who are going to have to address these issues. Our target group is the pragmatic professionals. I bet virtually every planner in Vancouver is going to be online, talking to their compatriots."

Twenty thousand people have pre-registered for the forum and Kelly expects the total number of participants to be forty thousand or more. "We have registrants from 176 countries plus one person from Antarctica," he says.

Kelly is keenly aware of how much discussion there has already been on these kinds of issues, and how little it seems to have accomplished. "There's been endless discussion about what to do, but very little discussion about how to do it. We are trying to raise the profile of these issues and link people up so they can make it happen. We are developing new tools to speed up the dialogue. And if we find real innovators through the Habitat Jam, maybe we can bringing those people to the World Urban Forum."

"It's far from perfect," Kelly says. "But we're experimenting here. We're taking some risks."

Can this latest flood of words - admittedly ambitious and technologically sophisticated - actually lead to the action Margaret Trudeau was longing for thirty years ago?

One can only hope.

Dorothy Bartoszewski is a Vancouver writer.

To register for the Habitat Jam, click here.  [Tyee]

12  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • BC Mary

    6 years ago

    Comments on "Wanna Jam?"

    " ... maybe we can bringing those people to the World Urban Forum," writes Dorothy. In words ... words which don't fit together or make sense.

    Dammit all, Dorothy, don't slime words. All actions (good actions, at least) begin with words. Ain't nuthin' wrong with words. Can't imagine life without them, in fact.

    The snarky tone of this story got my back up. This could have been prevented by concluding with a nice little word picture[U] of even one action which you think might improve the world's supply of clean water.

  • skeptikool

    6 years ago

    BC Mary,

    You quoted from the article:

    Quote:
    "..maybe we can bringing those people to the World Urban Forum."

    It becomes more clear with an added comma.

    Quote:
    We are developing new tools to speed up the dialogue. And if we find real innovators through the Habitat Jam, maybe we can(,) bringing those people to the World Urban Forum."

  • skeptikool

    6 years ago

    ps Also agree on "snarky" tone of the article.

  • Gentle Reader

    6 years ago

    I think the line quoted had a typo -- I think it should say "..maybe we can BRING those people to the World Urban Forum."

    I don’t get a snarky tone from this, I'm not sure why BC Mary does. It seems like a relatively balanced description – it certainly made me more interested in the event.

    It ends with "Can this latest flood of words - admittedly ambitious and technologically sophisticated - actually lead to the action Margaret Trudeau was longing for thirty years ago?

    One can only hope."

    What's snarky about that?

    Journalists are supposed to be skeptical and ask tough questions, for god's sakes. That's what makes an article different from press release copy. Kelly gets to rebut every critical point that's brought up, and his quotes are lengthy and he sounds good in them. If this same tone was used on an event being put on by the Fraser Institute, would you still think it was snarky, or would you then call it "balanced"?

    And as for the idea that the writer should put forward some positive world changing idea -- that's not the role of a journalist in this kind of a story. It's a news story, not an opinion piece or a platform for the writer's "save the world" brainwaves.

  • canuck_cougar

    6 years ago

    Speaking of a snarky tone:

    The

    Quote:
    Furthermore, Kelly sees age as a bigger barrier to participation than other factors. "Kids are text messaging all over the place in Africa," says Kelly. "It's the forty-year-olds who are scared of technology.

    Maybe I'm just an overly sensitve older broad but I resent the statement "It's the forty-year-olds who are scared of technology." Au contraire my young friend. I simply have no use for certain types of technology. If it won't make my life easier and I can't afford it anyway, I don't buy it. That's not fear; I call that pragmatism.

  • hamlet

    6 years ago

    Well, I didn't find it snarky at all. It sounded strong, maybe hard-hitting, with a healthy dose of realism thrown in. It left it up to the reader to wonder if the JAM will be a success. Isn't that what good journalism is all about, to be thought-provoking? I've read this writer's stuff before and I like it!

  • darcy.mcgee

    6 years ago

    So did you people sell my email address to these people? I keep getting mail, and dutifully note it as spam. I've certainly never asked for it.

  • Tyee editor (not verified)

    6 years ago

    darcy.mcgee, I can assure you that The Tyee has shared your email address with no one. That is an iron clad policy. We ask for commenters' email addresses only so that we can communicate with them, if need be, about the content or tone of comments on the site. And we keep those email addresses secret.

  • writerdave

    6 years ago

    canuck_cougar, I believe if you reread that paragraph, you'll see that the 40-year-olds being referred to are the ones in Africa. I don't think the author was referring to 40-year-olds globally.

  • allan

    6 years ago

    Good journalism, bad journalism. Take your pick.

    But there does seem to be quite a bit of confusion lingering here in the comment section as to just what was said, meant, implied and obviously, understood.

    I too would have preferred an example or two of what might flow out of the solution boxes aside from the dreams of a starry-eyed young urbanite who still had much growing up to do when she uttered her comments 38 years ago.

    Will the forum end up praising today's current addiction to consumerism?

    Perhaps low-flow composting toilets will be shown to induce madness in apartment dwellers.

    Yes, I'm being silly, but I don't think it would have been that much a struggle for the author to fence the intent in a bit, at least enough so readers might get a sense of what's going to be playing over in this corner or on that stage.

    Canuck cougar, I feel for you, but at 57 I'm starting to accept the slings of agism as inevitable, especially from those who beleive that all urban planners are under 40.

    Does anyone know if Jane Jacobs has been made aware of the age limits?

  • Salishsea

    6 years ago

    Quote:
    "It's far from perfect," Kelly says. "But we're experimenting here. We're taking some risks."

    Beautiful. This is what we need more of...experiementation, play, jamming. People are so quick to call for action, and very few can name "action" which has actually worked. So I like this approach...experiement and see if we can't innovate betterness.

    Best wishes to the Habitat Jammers! Cynical journalists are welcome to play along.

  • skeptikool

    6 years ago

    darcy.mcgee

    Quote:
    So did you people sell my email address to these people? I keep getting mail, and dutifully note it as spam. I've certainly never asked for it.

    Sorry to be late on this. Some time back I went to a link suggested on the thread. I've forgotten the topic and didn't copy the link.

    Feedback was asked for and I responded. I noted a fellow Tyee poster's pseudonym and was quite shocked to see his/her email address attached to the commentary - as it probably would have been with mine.

    I did not record that fellow poster's address.

    Signed:

    Frequently-shat-upon at your service.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.