- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Globe and Mail Poll Called 'Unethical' by Expert
Portrayed as authoritative, the sensitively timed survey said to be highly biased in approach.
'It's the Globe's responsibility'
On the Friday before the tightest provincial election facing British Columbia this decade, Canada’s most influential newspaper published dramatic poll numbers that appear to be based on biased methodology.
“This is unethical,” Vancouver pollster Angus McAllister told The Tyee. “The Globe and Mail ought to be responsible enough not to publish a poll where the ballot question is preceded by 14 questions that influence people’s answers.”
The poll, which was released on Friday the 13th, predicted that the BC Liberal Party would beat the New Democrats by a 13 per cent margin on May 17. Co-sponsored by The Globe and Mail as well as CTV, the poll was conducted by a Toronto firm called The Strategic Counsel.
The wide lead found by the Strategic Counsel poll not only exceeded both the 8-point lead predicted by an Ipsos-Reid poll and the 5-point lead predicted by a Mustel Group poll (both of which were conducted the same week), it also differed from those polls in that its Liberal lead exceeded its margin of error. At a critical moment in the campaign, the Globe’s 13-point prediction provided an appearance of invincibility that buoyed BC Liberals and demoralized New Democrats.
“With four days to go until the election,” The Globe and Mail reported on the front page of its BC section, “the governing BC Liberals have surged into a commanding lead that will produce another solid majority for the party.”
Ratcheting up bias?
Professional pollsters take considerable effort not to influence the thinking process of people they are questioning. For this reason, the professional practice is to ask how the respondent intends to vote before saying anything that might influence that decision. Pollsters generally ask about voting intent within the first three questions.
The Globe’s poll asked 14 questions before inquiring how respondents planned to vote.
“If you’re really trying to find out where people stand, you don’t want to ask them questions that will lead them in any one direction,” observed Steven Rosell, who is a partner to highly respected American pollster Dan Yankelovich.
Equally unusual were the questions themselves, and the sequence in which they were asked:
Question 3: “Some people say the election is about trust and keeping election promises. Other people say that the election is about providing effective government and ensuring that the economy continues to grow. Which of these two points of view best reflects your own?”
Question 4: “Some people have been saying it’s time for a change and a new government should be voted in. Other people have said that now would be the wrong time to make a change and we should return the Liberals to power. Which of these two views best represents your own?
Question 5: “Most people have been telling us that the BC economy is in pretty good shape right now. Some say the provincial government had very little to do with this improvement, so there’s no risk in changing to an NDP government. Others say that without the right approach, the economy will slow down and it’s too risky to switch to the NDP. Which one of these two views best represents your own?”
“This is outrageous,” McAllister responded, after The Tyee directed him to a document listing the questions. “They are using a sequence of questions to build an argument for the BC Liberal government.”
‘Definitely not accepted technique’
The Strategic Counsel poll asked nine more questions before inquiring which candidates respondents would support. Those questions included: “Which party had the best advertising?” and “Which party has fielded the best team of candidates?”
“When you ask a whole bunch of questions like these in a row, you are stimulating a thinking process that was not already there,” explained McAllister, a former vice president with Ipsos-Reid and Environics who now heads McAllister Research.
“This sort of questioning is a message-testing technique. It’s a way of testing messages and determining the impact of those messages on voter decisions. It is most definitely not an accepted technique for predicting election results.”
All but one of the 19 questions asked in the poll conducted from May 9-11 can be found in a document posted on Strategic Counsel co-founder Allan Gregg’s personal web site.
One question is curiously absent from the document posted on Gregg’s site, however. The document includes details about every question and answer except for number 14. The document offers no explanation as to why the question was redacted.
The missing question immediately precedes question 15, in which the Globe poll finally inquires as to which party candidates the respondent would support “if the election were being held tomorrow.” Neither Allan Gregg nor The Strategic Counsel was available for comment on this Sunday afternoon.
‘Definitely unethical’
Also unexplained is why The Globe and Mail sponsored the unusual poll.
The National Council on Public Polls is an association of polling organizations established in 1969. The US-based organization sets professional standards for public opinion pollsters, and advises media on how to interpret poll results. The council’s website includes a guide entitled, 20 Questions A Journalist Should Ask About Poll Results.
These include “What questions were asked?” and “In what order were they asked?”
“Sometimes the very order of the questions can have an impact on the results,” the polling association’s guide warns. “Often that impact is intentional; sometimes it is not. The impact of order can often be subtle.”
Rod Mickleburgh is bureau chief for The Globe and Mail's British Columbia office. He did not know who chose the poll’s questions. “The polling firm was selected in Toronto,” Mickleburgh said. “It’s only recently we’ve been using Strategic Counsel.”
“It’s possible we published a rogue poll,” he added. “Or, our poll could be right.”
“It’s the Globe’s responsibility,” McAllister concluded. “The Globe and Mail appears to have misrepresented a message-testing poll as a public opinion poll. And they’ve released those results just four days before an election. This is definitely unethical.”
Veteran political journalist Monte Paulsen is managing editor of The Tyee’s Election Central. ![]()



48
Login or register to post comments
Jeeves
7 years ago
Comments on "Globe and Mail Poll Called 'Unethical' by Expe
Unreal. I also emailed the newsroom at G&M for the preposterous weekend edition of their paper.
From the Gary Mason Igali love-in, to the unpenned pro-Fiberal rants - it was a disgusting display of so called journalism.
Of course they are admitting to their errors now - the damage is done and they can reap their rewards.
Canwest media whores. Brutal.
jazz
7 years ago
Jeeves,
The Globe and Flail is not Canwest, it's Bell media. But I am as disappointed as you in this poll. What's going on with the (formerly) beloved Globe? Perhaps they need to have their subscriptions disappear for a while.
If this goes down as everyone is speculating, and the Fibbers get re-elected, we will have a lot of media work to do. Do we have any lawyers on the left?
sdgreen
7 years ago
The Poll and the results seem just right to me. No different than any other poll.
Just because the results do not favour the Left does not mean such is invalid!
What if the results favoured the NDP?
billy pilgrim
7 years ago
the tightest election facing b c this decade????
it's the second, and the first was not very tight!!!! the tightest election facing b c this decade!!! you lost me after that little bit of sensationalism!!!
BC Mary
7 years ago
Jeeves & Jazz -- I'm with you. That deplorable Globe editorial (that fail-grade Liberal advert) depressed me 6 ways t'hell. It was as if an old friend had died.
I'd like to see a legal challenge. As in: how much premeditated damage can a newspaper do, before it crosses the line into wilfull mischief for the purpose of a benefit? As in that BCTF falsehood by CanWest.
The Globe & Mail, by the way, published 2 excellent Letters-to-the-Editor today (May 15) headed "Campbell, no thanks!"
Gary
7 years ago
What these rags and Media stations are doing is nothing short of advertising for the Fiberal government. I sincerely hope that someone in the know will have these rags prosecuted for whatever reasons they can find.Try false advertising, deception. Whatever.I have never been so disgusted with the major media in my life. I have stopped watching Tony and Bill et al and have not bought a newspaper in 3 years. Just for the simple fact that there reporting is nothing but a pack of lies.There used to be some real reporters in this province.(Jack Webster) who reported all views. The mealy mouth little pricks we have today are nothing but puppets for their editors. And the editors are a joke.
As for the no-mind that asks "what if the results favored the NDP?" I can't see why anyone with half a brain could ask such a moronic question. How can any result that has been abused in this way benefit anyone but the Fiberals.
Budd Campbell
7 years ago
I don't understand how anyone can be surprised by Rod Mickleburgh's reaction. He is one of the Globe's reporters who likes to appear professional and kind of impartial.
The reality is that he is quite sympathetic to the Christian Right and the pro-life forces, to the point of refusing to ever identify them in any report he does on the BC Liberals. His game is to paint the Campbell Liberals as economic conservatives and social liberals, and to ignore the entire Fraser Valley wing of the party.
Ron Erwin
7 years ago
What's wrong with the Fraser Valley wing of the BC Liberal Party. Am I missing something ? Is it now evil to be a Christian ? Is it now evil to be conservative ? No wonder the NDP are going down bigtime.
Coyote
7 years ago
I've been a Globe & Mail reader for a long time. Though its business/corporatist bias is evident, it has generally presented a relatively well balanced set of viewpoints around an interesting range of issues. As well, to here at least, it had seemed to resist that sharpened, more clearly "class" polarization trend within corporate media, which has gathered momentum since the early '80s.
All of which began to change at the Globe and Mail some time ago now, along with, as I've previously noted, even the public broadcaster, CBC, regardless of the latter's protestations to the contrary. And which arrives at the zenith point development of this phenomena, with this so-called "poll" that shows "overwhelming" support for the Liberals in BC, that can in fact only seriously be called a "push" poll, at best. What has finally emerged along this entire range of status quo "media" policy and opinion is that, we seem to have finally reached a point where corporate media intent is patently at a place where, it sees its own role as more purely "propagandistic" than in anyway balanced or objectively informative. Even the "pretence" is being allowed to fall by the wayside.
That has really always been there, of course, and neither, given the nature and dynamic of the socio-=historical period we are in, am I surprised. It is merely now more blatant and obvious, with little intent to even "appear" otherwise. (But really, it has been evolving and gathering momentum since the days of the Solidarity Movement in the early '80s, like I say.)
So mostly, we just all need to face up and 'fess up to it, and appreciate the impact it needs to have on our left wing politics (for those of us unabashedly so). Because what this development of a more openly propagandistic media is indicating to us, I think, is that there is a need to take more hardened (as in "firm") political positions ourselves, and to develop more aggressive tactics and strategies, that will break though the iron curtain veil being placed between us, and the mass of ordinary citizenry. (As we need to continue to sharpen our analysis and critique of current capitalism.)
And that isn't an argument for foolhardyness or adventurism, though a youth centred "leftist" energy and willingness to engage in some levels of "risk behaviour" would certainly be approptiate, I think. It is more a "suggestion" that serious efforts to organize ourselves and broader elements of working people, intellectuals, students, agriculture and the community, outside the controlling influence of all political parties per se is needed. For it's only people in motion from here on, I really do think, and I mean very large numbers of them, who are going to be able break through this new propaganda iron curtain of "the system", and force a new and counterposing political and economic dynamic.
Playing "the system's game", as the NDP and Greens content themselves with, is clearly, from here on in, going to more and more be a waste of time-, in and of itself. And catch the fine point of that ending, please, "...in and of itself."
I've got a really busy week coming up here, and I'm reading here every chance I get, and when and where I do get breaks, I will endeavour to drop in and make comments.
The run of history is not over yet, eh? (And one election, or even two, does not the full story of the history yet to be written make. :-) Stay strong, my friends.
allan
7 years ago
I have enjoyed my home delivery of the Globe for the past three years, but now must decide am I paying a premium price for the same distorted bullshit I could get for a quarter the price from an Asperrag?
A cooked opinion poll in the Globe&Mail?
If it's true it ranks right up their with the sludge coming out of the Gomery inquiry, a national disgrace.
I think I am beginning to understand why there is a profound shift in politics taking place across South America. The institutions have been lined up against the people for too long.
And this from the newspaper that claims to be the centre of journalistic balance in Canada, one that has reached out to disaffected former Vancouver Sun (and others) readers who were looking for accuracy and honesty.
This allegation of unethical polling begs the question, can we trust anything in the Globe anymore.
One of the good reads in the Globe, until recently has been the Saturday page 2 piece by editor Edward Greenspon, who added context to his writing staff's efforts to deliver the goods six day a week.
I think Greenspon might soon be called 'Fast' Eddie if this claim of playing fast and loose with the truth isn't clarified immediately.
Who's decision was it to hire a former conservative bagman to conduct the polling?
Who approved the questions?
Is this what "freedom of the press" is all about Eddy?
The freedom to simply shit all over the trust of citizens who have invested years of confidence in your newspaper?
Don't leave this to your Vancouver staff to clean up Eddy. This poll was created east of the Rockies and, as a subscriber to your newspaper, I want answers now.
Chris H
7 years ago
I'd like to hear what Norman Spector has to say about his beloved paper's bias.
JDC
7 years ago
GM just another paper that has joined into the blanket wash of media concentration covering Canada. Be it Canwest or Bell...whoever...proves media can be bought.
( literally ). The GM was one of the last standouts ( or so I thought ) They will joining the long list of papers I wont read now..news stations I wont watch..etc. I can see through the BS...sad that so many ( the ones they are counting on ).... cant. I still get surprised looks when I tell people that most media in Canada is owned by one or two companies and news is def. " filtered ". Gotta go toss the very sad weekend edition of the GM in the trash.. that pathetic and biased editorial put me right over the edge.
Sue Clark
7 years ago
No Ron, it is not evil to be a Christian, but most Christians do not believe in doing what the BC Liberals are doing. There is no way that Gordon Campbell has the so-called Christian vote.
jayward
7 years ago
Surprise, surprise! That a right wing newspaper full of infomercials for corporations would "cook" a poll right before an election. Hmm. seems to me that the local CTV tried that in the election that the Glen Clark NDP won.
When, a paper's main supporters are advertisers selling goods with bogus ads and great supporters of the Fiberals what did you expect?
JIm
7 years ago
Surprise, surprise! Tyee posters are whining and complaining about a "biased" media source other than their own.
Maybe thetyee.ca should teach others a lesson in objectivity. HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
Ron Erwin
7 years ago
Accorging to Krog, the NDP candidate in Nanaimo, Jesus would not be a Republican or Liberal. You can see now why I have such disdain for the secular left. I wouldn't want a left wing wacko party like the BC NDP near any of my children or granchildren. This godlees party is actually proud of who they are. I say banics them to the anals of history, never to rise again to plaque us with theie useless, illogical, hateful rhetoric. ( Now you know how I reaaly feel.xxxxxxxNDPxxxxxxx.
allan
7 years ago
Perhaps, just perhaps, there is a silver lining around this shocker.
The election may well be much closer than many have thought given the skewed polling.
If that is the case, the hyena above may want to mute his chortling long enough to reconsider some of the tight races across the province.
I am certainly not writing this morning with dreams of an NDP majority, but it certainly would be nice to see the Liberals and some of their animal friends having to start looking over their shoulders.
And nothing would give me more pleasure than to see a few of the incumbent Liberal MLA's out on their ass.
I await that regardless of the final outcome because I know there are going to be Liberal losers who, in my eyes, will represent the leading edge of Liberal demise.
allan
7 years ago
Ron Erwin, if you represent Christianity, I want absolutely nothing to do with it.
Your post above is entirely "hateful rhetoric" and suggests to me you haven't matured enough as a human being to step out of that mythical swamp you grew up in.
verso
7 years ago
Well said, allan.
deeby
7 years ago
Ron, the only problem I have with the Fraser Valley wing, and fundamentalist Christianity in general, is the never-ending obsession on the part of its proponents with how I choose to live my life, even when I live non-violently and (mostly) within the law.
It's not evil to be a Christian, but being an inveterate busybody and obsessing about the private, legal activities of one's neighbors can lead to all manner of evil....
off-handed
7 years ago
Ron Erwin says "I wouldn't want a left wing wacko party like the BC NDP near any of my children or granchildren"
So your children and grandchildren can wallow in $6. an hour paying job, after they get out of an oversized classroom that they had to bus to because their school closed.
Or perhaps they are one of the homeless that grace Vancouver's streets?
Or perhaps one of them is on a waiting list for medical treatment?
I can see your point...NOT...
You would probably vote for Stephen Harper too.
jesterjogger
7 years ago
After feeling sick to my stomach when i saw that paper i then realized what absolute bullshit it probably was. Sure enough here we go again. The liberals are scared shitless about this election and have been pulling out all the stops since the damaging debate. They are so scared that the business council and corporate media are desperately clamouring to gain votes in the last few days with an all out pro-liberal barrage. How disgusting.
Their cynical efforts are an affront to democracy, just as the filthy rebublicans methods were in the last two us elections.
Win at any cost-wow, what progressive thinking!! Ghandi and Nelson Mandela would be proud! Greens vote NDP, Greens vote NDP!!!!
Name
7 years ago
This is so depressing! It's to be expected that biases and passions would spill over on the eve of elections -- including The Tyee's, of course ("...tightest provincial election this decade", Monte?? ...though I'm continually puzzled by the Rons getting themselves all apoplectic on a daily basis about the left-wing bias of a publication that was expressly created to provide us with some balance to our right-wing CanWest monopoly.)
I used to have a lot of faith in the Globe as being conservative and business-centric and Toronto-centric and a bit stodgy but at least credible, fair and ethical. What's going on?
Sue Clark
7 years ago
Gordon Campbell shows no signs of being a social conservative, so why would the right-wing Christians bother to vote for him? He can only hurt most residents of this province and this is not something that Christians would vote for.
There are always left-wing and moderate Christians who would never vote for the extreme right wing parties such as the BC Liberals.
By the way Ron, the NDP are the real liberals in BC. The NDP are moderates, not extremists.
snuffy
7 years ago
I knew there had to be a reason for the polls results because that not what I'll hearing in the North Island. To the Frazer Valley folks, I was told about a fellow some time back that gave away food (bread and fish, wild I'm pretty sure) chased the bankers out of the church and ministered to the sick for free. Today he would be called a socialist and crucified. Not much has changed eh!
cmd
7 years ago
Couple of points:
1) it's distressing to see that the urge to censor is alive and well, as evidenced by BCMary and Gary's suggestion that the press should be prosecuted for printing news that biased, incorrect or that they don't like. The false news sections of the Criminal Code were struck down years ago as unconstitutional and we're better without them. And I don't think you'll get too far with the mischief provisions, which are there to protect property.
2) On polling generally, I recall reading during the American elections that the accuracy of polling had been reduced because there were so many people who used cellphones as their only contact and pollsters were not allowed to call cellphones. Anyone aware if this is the situation in Canada as well?
I imagine it would be safe to assume that people who use cellphones as their only contact are not demographically identical to the rest of the population and that their absence from the sample might skew things one way or another.
jtothemfk
7 years ago
note the writer said "tightest provincial election... this decade" not in a decade. It's a meaningless rhetorical intro but it's not untrue. Should have been left out all together or maybe just referred to as a fairly tight election or something a little less intended to get the blood boiling.
Having said that, I'm saddened the G&M would pull such BS. I've just purchased one this morning but haven't opened it yet.
hellokitty
7 years ago
I say banics them to the anals of history, never to rise again to plaque us with theie useless, illogical, hateful rhetoric.
Oh, Ron, your Freudian slip is showing!
Bobb999
7 years ago
And I thought CanWest Global took the prize for the least objective, agenda driven media company in Canada!
It looks like this week the Globe takes the prize.
Perhaps their mistake was in hiring Alan Gregg
to do their polling. Maybe they put more trust in him to be objective than was justified.
My question is: Who is most to blame for this, Gregg, or the Globe?
cantancoRich
7 years ago
As I've said many a time, give me the results you expect and I'll help you design your poll.
Hence we have a (very) Strategic Council poll with the Liars 13 points ahead while a Robbins Research poll has the NDP ahead by nine.
What? you haven't read about the Robbins poll? I wonder why. But I'm glad the media chose to ignore that one; it might have made the soft left a little complacent.
Yes, this is a very close election, and reminds me a lot of 1996. I predict the Liars will win the popular vote by about two per cent. Each party will elect 39 MLAs with Kamloops deciding the election again.
Gotta go now, there's another hundred or so doors to knock on today.
redrivergirl
7 years ago
There may be back-door promises made to these people who appear to be the pharasees Jesus warned about, as evidenced by their behaviour and words.
When the BC Liberal team's God is Carl Rove and a bastardized version of 'the free market', it only stands to reason they'd make a deal with you know who. What surprises me is that the fundamentalist community would risk its tax free status by organizing politically and also risk this secular nation's policy of tolerance which allows them the religious freedom that they take completely for granted.
A popular whine among fundamentalists is that they are being persecuted! (because they have to live in a secular world - I guess, even though Jesus himself, addressed these issues by saying be in the world, not of it. And, render onto Ceasar) I worry about this because I'm afraid that when this movement plays out globally and there is a massive backlash against Christians, there may be real persecution. And, I worry that those among them who actually are Christain , will suffer.
Jesus said many things. Nothing about same sex marriage. Not even anything about abortion. Although he did say a lot about children already born. He did say the highest command was two fold. To love God first, and to love one's neighbour as one's self.
His focus was the care of the poor, the suffering and the outcasts in society. On comforting the afflicted. On tolerance and not judging others.
Jesus was a socialist who loved God. It can't be denied.
Reggin
7 years ago
AMEN!! Fortunately, for all of us NO political party has a hold on Christianity but do check out the Christian leaders who founded the NDP!!
As Big Jean said" The only poll to trust is the election day poll."
Seriously, the role of newspapers and journalist needs to be examined by an ethics committee.
They should be there to give FACTS to help people decide and NOT endorsements which only show how much thay are manipulated by big business and/or their owners.
So here is the latest Castanet poll from Kelowna: http://www.castanet.net/cgi-bin2/newNews/news_list.cgi?method=show_story&page=11
If this holds expect a BIG NDP majority as this is the right wing area of all right wing areas and note the drop in Green support to about 5%.
Do you REALLY want to vote Green and get the LIBERALS big times again?!
Budd Campbell
7 years ago
Ron Erwin disengenuously asks: "What's wrong with the Fraser Valley wing of the BC Liberal Party. ... Is it now evil to be a Christian ? Is it now evil to be conservative ? No wonder the NDP are going down bigtime."
The support of the Christian Right, heavily centred in the Fraser Valley, but also in the Okanagan and the Peace country, is an integral element in the provincial Liberal voting coalition. Federally, of course, these people will have nothing to do with anything called either Liberal or liberal, but that's another story.
The point is that any rational political reporter is going to mention this religious element in one party's support base, just as they incessantly mention labour and unions in the NDP's support base. At least, that's what the media are going to do if they are making any attempt to be balanced. Rod Mickleburgh doesn't do that.
lynn
7 years ago
This is the god of advertising at work. Polls that serve and advertise corporate interests. Mass media that does the same.
Product. Image of product. Sell image.
Sell, sell, sell.
Quality of product is meaningless in this game of mass indoctrination by branding.
On Sunday, the busy soccer moms and dads mindlessly buy an image of running shoes. On Monday they mindlessly buy an image of an SUV. On Tuesday they mindlessly buy the image of a government.
Buy, buy, buy.
None of it based on the quality of truth or based in reality itself. Just deceptive ephemeral images. The flimsy stuff of dreams ...or remnants of nightmares. Take your pick.
Newspapers have become just another department, just another convenient, and yes, effective wing of a now global corporate ad agency. Another door at the service of the privileged few.
And Canada is being lined up now, province by province, neo-con premier by neo-con premier, domino by domino...the recent shifts by the Globe...the shifts by the keel that once balanced this country, the CBC... the shift towards Harper...they are not coincidental but slyly orchestrated. The dominos are dangerously tilting. And not in our favour.
This is a more gentle, more neighbourly war than the one waged against Iraq... but a war just the same. But much more perilous in its ability to fool.
Coyote
7 years ago
Excellent shot. I'm still chuckling. Nailed the bugger right in the anal.
crazyfrazy
7 years ago
I feel validated with my decision years ago to not buy the dailies, as this confirms, yet again, that they are unfairly biased. It doesn't surprise me that the Liberals would sink to dirty tactics so close to the election. They don't care if at a later date, they are found to be out of order. They got away with it for now. What makes me happy is that this action shows that the Liberals know it will be close, and they are running scared and doing all they can to influence the vote at the last minute. The more Liberal BS I see, the more I wave my NDP signs proudly!
Sparkyboy
7 years ago
Whoa, I don't know how you lefties can soldier on in the face of such heinous diabolical adversity....
...but cheer up, the Georgia Straight endorsed a full gaggle of NDPers with a sprinkle of Greenies and a token Wally Oppal bringing up the rear for the how do you say...Fiberals
Now if you can just get out the BC Bud vote
Hey mannnnnnnnnnnnn, wanna do some votingggg
Banquos ghost
7 years ago
Well spoken, Lynn.
The change is nearly complete.
More people now think that their and their families interests and the interests of corporations are interchangeable.
That the political party that vows to make smooth the way for corporate entities is the political party that also has their families best interests at heart.
That tax reductions and deferrals for corporations don't amount to an increased reliance for revenue on taxes from middle class citizens. And that reduced tax revenue from corporations means much, much less likelihood of a meaningful reduction in the tax load for middle class families.
People have once again bought into a parallel notion similar to the old "What's good for General Motors is good for America".
redrivergirl
7 years ago
Excellent commentary, Lynn.
Who knew Canada had so many traitors.
sail_junkie
7 years ago
On Friday, I asked about margin of error and suggested that the methodology might be suspect if the margin of error was larger than for the other polls. This confirms my suspicion. As the old saying goes: "figures don't lie, but liars can figure".
If I was trying to motivate demoralized campaign workers, the timing of this admission couldn't have been better. If this poll is wonky, then the election is clearly closer than Globe and Mail would have us believe.
As for Alan Gregg, guess he'll do anything for anyone, won't he?
Ain't going to comment on the Christianity debate of this thread, except to say that the framers of the U.S. constitution were smart to talk about separating the church and the state. I'll let others comment about the effectiveness of recent practices.
sirjohna
7 years ago
what a great day! more blather than ever before. pump on!
JIm
7 years ago
It's a little strange that the only people making a big deal of this poll are you. This poll was largely blown off due to it's high margin or error, small sample size and strange results. But as usual thetyee.ca is making a huge deal about nothing.
Banquos ghost
7 years ago
Those that work in market research, like me, have good reason to be concerned about this poll because it's an example of how easily the technology of the industry can be misused and results can be misconstrued.
Coyote
7 years ago
Oooooo, Lynn gal, an outstanding snippet of analysis and insight, such as you are famous for. None cut closer to the quick or the bone than thee.
Stump
7 years ago
"This godlees party is actually proud of who they are. I say banics them to the anals of history, never to rise again to plaque us with theie useless, illogical, hateful rhetoric."
Well, plaque my anals before I banic!
I thinc I'm gled I'll niver git to heeven.
To update an old saying, the religious right is neither.
Banquos ghost
7 years ago
The religious right is antichrist.
Bobb999
7 years ago
I just heard a Liberal radio ad on CKNW that brags that the Vancouver Sun, The Province, and the Victoria Times Colonist are all 3 endorsing the B.C. Liberal Party!The ad would like you to believe that sober independent thought by editorial boards went into these endorsements.
Unfortunately, the ad doesn't explain that all 3 are Canwest papers and that the papers' owners, the Aspers, literally give marching orders to their editorial boards when they wish to promote an "official" company position. We can safely assume the papers were literally forced to endorse the Liberals. Recall the firing of the Ottawa Citizen editor for writing his own mind on Chretien (saying Chretien should resign as PM).
There seems to be a lot of manipulation going on , with suspect opinion polls and phoney endorsements, all skewed toward the Liberals.
brennan
7 years ago
I just returned from Venezuela, which has twice elected a socialist president, Hugo Chavez. Chavez calls himself a socialist and often invokes Christ in his speeches. For example, speaking to citizens at San Carlos, state of Cohedes on January 10, 2003 he said, "You are the most powerful force that exists between heaven and earth, after God, you, the sovereign people of Venezuela" and went on to say later, "God is with us! Who is against us? We walk along the path of God, we walk along the path of Christ, the Redeemer of the peoples and the Lord of Venezuela".
Under Chavez, education has improved for ordinary citizens, there is real land reform and the state enterprises are firmly under state control. This is particularly true of the oil industry, a point not lost by the Americans, who promoted a failed coup in Venezuela three years ago.
There are many Christian Socialists in the world. While I am not one of them, I do see the connection between the real teachings of Christ and their extension to the political world. He did, after all, expel the money lenders from the temple. Perhaps now, if we could just get rid of Campbell and his money lenders.