Life

Young Workers, Serious Risks

As I waited for coffee, didn't anyone see the impending accident that made me hold my breath?

By Helesia Luke, 12 Nov 2010, TheTyee.ca

Slippery floor warning

Just below, a vat of hot frying grease.

Related

Over the past seven years I have conducted research into the consequences of deregulating child labour in B.C. I have crunched the numbers on work-related injuries suffered by children. And since 2003, when the law changed allowing children as young as 12 to work just about anywhere with the permission of only one parent, I have cautioned about the heightened dangers facing children in the workplace.

As a researcher, I read about workplace hazards and use my imagination to project a mental picture of dangerous situations. This past weekend I had the unfortunate opportunity to watch the following scenario unfold.

'Just don’t fall'

After dropping my daughter off at the soccer field for her pre-game warm-up, I stopped at a nearby fast food restaurant to grab a coffee. It was shortly before noon and the place was hopping. At least six people were waiting for food while another eight or nine stood in line to order. As I waited, a young male employee (perhaps 13-15 years old) began the strangely timed task of cleaning the shelves and surfaces above the deep fryer and French fry station. He set up a high step stool and proceeded to use a spray cleaner. He joked with fellow workers as he stepped back and forth and on and off the step stool. Like many growing teenagers, he appeared uncoordinated and clumsy -- unsure of his body and the length of his arms.

The youngster was clearly unskilled at cleaning (as many are!) and after spraying on far too much, the cleaning solution dripped off a shelf and into the fries -- no one appeared to notice. A few seconds later he dropped the cleaning rag into the same fries. A female colleague, filling a bag of fries beneath his reach, quickly grabbed it, handed it back and said jokingly, "Hey just don’t fall -- ok?"

CHILD LABOUR IN BC

In 2003 the B.C. government changed child labour laws to allow children as young as 12 years old to work at virtually any work site with the consent of one parent.

Now, there are only four regulations that specifically oversee 12-14 year-olds in the workforce. In effect, these changes transferred the responsibility from government to parents to determine if a work site is safe for a child.

Between 2004 and 2008, Worksafe BC's accepted injury claims for 12-14-year-olds increased 10-fold. Children are getting injured in a variety of sectors, including accommodation and food services, retail, agriculture, construction and manufacturing.

Statscan does not track youth under 15 years-old in the workforce, so there is no way of reliably knowing how many children are working and at what jobs.

First Call: BC Child and Youth Advocacy Coalition has made several recommendations including tougher laws to protect children from exploitation and injury.

More here.

— H.L.

Next, after spraying the cleaner directly upwards, it dripped back into his face. Still standing at the top of the step-ladder, he did what any teenager might do around the family dinner table. He used the front of his shirt to wipe the cleaning solution out of his eyes.

Coming back down the step ladderm he disappeared for a minute and came back having rinsed (I assume) the cleaning rag. Then, using the top step of the ladder on which he had just stood proceeded to first lay out the rag and then fold it into a smaller square. With this, he continued to wipe the surfaces around and above the food preparation area.

Throughout all of this, his teenage colleagues darted back and forth around him and the step-ladder, emptying the hot French fry basket, salting fries and filling orders.    

I was riveted, was anyone else watching this? The manager -- clearly marked by his name tag and uniform -- was also dodging around this worker filling hot beverage orders and greeting customers.

'That's his job'

The teenager continued to teeter precariously above and adjacent to the deep fryer. I imagined we were seconds away from witnessing an avoidable tragedy. One wrong move in this chaos and he would fall. Reaching out for something to brace his fall, he might burn his hand on the overhead heater warming the fries or hit the floor knocking his colleagues over with whatever they were carrying, or worse, land in the hot oil.

Who on earth instructed this teenager to do this task (never mind how to do it) at the height of a fast food lunch hour with food production and equipment in full swing? 

It was finally my turn at the counter and the manager greeted me. "What that young man is doing is very dangerous," I started. The manager looked surprised. "He’s cleaning, that's his job."

"Is there another point in the day when that task could be done?" I replied.

"No, this happens all day long -- the kitchen has to be cleaned," he replied.

At this point I realized the conversation was not going to be productive. I pointed out some of the things I had just witnessed and emphasized that standing on a step-ladder above a hot deep fryer is a very dangerous thing to do. The manager restated his position that cleaning was this worker's job and it was okay as long as he was not wiping food preparation surfaces.

Diminished protections

Contemplating my next point, I realized that other than obvious health code violations, there was nothing offside in this picture, considering the very few regulations that apply to child workers in B.C. The teenager was working under the direct supervision of someone who was clearly over the age of 19; was not working on a school day; might not be exceeding a 20-hour work week (I'm extending the benefit of the doubt here); and if under the age of 15 as he appeared, likely had the permission of one parent. Since 2003 in B.C., there are almost no tasks this youngster is prohibited from carrying out.

Had I already had that cup of coffee, I might have yelled out for all to hear that every worker has the right to refuse unsafe work; but would the teenage employees see the danger and if so would they say something and risk reprisal?

As the manager filled my coffee cup, he reprimanded the teenager and pointed at me. I shook my head. I am still shaking my head.  [Tyee]

20  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Van Isle

    1 year ago

    I too have witnessed

    I too have witnessed 'accidents-waiting to-happen' by young people on construction sights. Where are the mentors? Where are the Work-safe people? My experience is that the supervisor on the job-site is more interested in production and safety is a side issue. The only time the supervisor is concerned about safety is when an accident happens and now they have tonnes of paperwork to do which now cuts into the production in the job. If those supervisors had given a little more thought about safety, maybe, just maybe they would spend a lot less time doing Work-safe paper work.

  • lia k n

    1 year ago

    shared responsibility

    We all have a responsibility to keep workers safe, especially vulnerable workers such as child labourers. There are a few easy steps we can follow.
    1. Never patronize and establishment where you witness unsafe practices. In the case of this story the author should have walked out the door and bought thier coffee somewhere else when they realised the managment had no regard for worker safety.
    2. Report unsafe practices to WorkSafe BC. Anyone can make a report to worksafe including a patron or a passerby. If you have a camera phone take a quick shot to add to your email. The incident described in the article was a near miss that had the potential for major bodily harm. Worksafe will be more likely to do an inspection for work sites where there have been complaints. I am sure an inspector would find many more hazards and the manager will be forced to comply with thier recommendations.
    3. Practice what we preach. Look around our own places of work for unsafe practices and identify them before someone suffers an injury.
    Safety is everyone's responsibility.

  • alive

    1 year ago

    get what you pay for!

    Young people coming into the workforce soon realize that manual labour is a dead end, and adopt an attitude that their lives are doomed already.

    As a result they do not take a menial job seriously, but instead regard it as a waste of their time and merely do a token effort, keeping their mind on anything else.

    The cure would be to stop the wide gap in earnings between "blue collar" workers and those who could afford to attend a university.

    We as a society pump millions into advanced education, which is fine, but we should not sit back and accept that the very people we support then wind up earning so much money that we create an envy barrier.

    There should be enough renumeration to average working people that they see their efforts rewarded; as things stand right now, kids see this discrepancy immediately and the results are as described in this article.

  • snert

    1 year ago

    The title of the article should be changed.

    To: Stupid Bosses, Serious Risks. People should have to pass a test before they can actually hire someone other than a contractor.

  • DenisB

    1 year ago

    just remember

    The real job of the WCB is to collect revenue for the government. Not to make sure that employees are safe. They might do something after the fact but that is unlikely. It's up to each worker to find out how to work safely on their own as well as what their rights are. Most unions are good about making sure their members are safe.

    Remember, If you do not WORKSAFEly in BC you will not be COMPENSATED.

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    This is news to me

    But certainly not the Liberal Government as it all falls on deaf ears.

    I remember reading a damming report a few years around and it is truly sad around here when BC youth can be tossed around like they were a mere coin. Heads the kids work for nothing and nobody says nothing and BC Liberals are ahead of the game. How does that work exactly where is the pay off?

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    My son works 60 to 70 hour a week

    He dosen't receive fair compensation and is afraid to say no to long hours or lose his job. He told them at work it was time to go home after working 18 hours after only a few hours of sleep and its the norm while being grossly underpaid. He walks home at 3 in the morniing because the buses don't run late enough and often walks home because his money runs out. He was so worried about his job but just couldn't stand on his feet and I told him my son the Universe will answer your needs and get some rest and things will look up. And where else is the reastuarant he works for going to find someone who works all those hours and takes all the BS but in BC so he was certain to get back his job.

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    And so he did get back his job

    So all is well in the universe until he ends up sleep walking into the deep fryer and Alive my son really likes his job and the people he works for and even his dumb ass boss who can figure that. It just dosen't seem fair to prosper of the backs of kids especially their broken backs and the province should have great shame for the conditions things are in.

  • editingfool

    1 year ago

    MORECHATTER

    morechatter should chatter less and proof read more

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    and shared responsibility

    I made my son aware of the laws and how he was being unfairly treated and if his boss fired him it was because conditions were not right and also that he was be forced to do the impossible. I told him he could also request all that overtime pay he never gets despite working there for sometime.
    It would be substantial but my son just looked at me Mom I hope my job is still there.
    It is not my place to take over for my son he would not appreciate it if I did.
    And he pointed out something I found interesting that is the way jobs are.

    WorkerCompensation and BC Kids do you really think these kids stand a chance of being treated fairly it has not been an experience shared by anyone but I guess we can always hope as WCB sees sucide as a way to save them some time.

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    and "fool"

    you said not me and youeven picked the name.

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    and editing fool

    I will do better with my editing and try not be is such a rush and how about you try to be more cool.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    PRetty shocking

    More chatter, I wasn't even trying and six violations of the BC Labour Code came to me as you wrote. I'm not even going to consider the Worksafe stuff - I tend to agree with Denis B, that they spend more time collecting money for their aggrandizement than making things right for workers, and they deliberately set up an adversarial system between managers and workers so that the conflict inevitably ends up with losers who pay - with money, health or the life of the business. It's not all one-sided - they know who has the money.

    There are times when I feel like it would be a solution to abolish WCB and go back to the time when every employee had his or her own personal lawyer attached to their ass like a lamprey, taking note of all the violations of reasonable acts and due diligence.

    At least for a week, anyway. Society would be broke, hungry and at a standstill after that.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    WCB (aka WorkSafeBC)

    I am self-employed, and while I do not need WCB, many of my regular clients are afraid of an investigation by WCB if I do not carry their insurance. So I do, resigned as I am that should I make a claim, I will be rejected, or the recompense will be miniscule at best - and primarily because I am self-employed, with no "clout" to fight their (completely arbitrary) rulings.

    I consider it a cost of doing business, and nothing more.

  • CanadianLatitude

    1 year ago

    This what the people of BC

    This what the people of BC voted for. Low wage conservatives, 6 buck training wage, 2 hour shifts, have to do your own fighting with employment standards now, the sheet with ones labour rights taken down from work all thanks to the people of BC who elected Campbell and the low wage cons not just once but 3 times. Shame on you all that voted Campbell and the low wage cons into power!

    The food industry wanted all these changes and the low wage government did as they were asked, so I do not feel sorry for them when they whine about losing money due to HST. boo hoo. NOT!

  • Noggy

    1 year ago

    The worst could be yet to come

    Wait till the uneducated lot passing out of the school system now start their working lives. If they can't read or comprehend properly for their age at this time then there will be the potential for many workplace accidents in the future.

  • Karen D.

    1 year ago

    I once watched a young man

    I once watched a young man running a table saw and cringed at the manner in which he used it. When I mentioned that he should get his supervisor to show him the safe way to cut wood before he ended up badly hurt he seemed to take offence. But, the next day he was using the machine safely and professionally.

    I think reporting an issue to worksafe isn't always a good first option. Many times people are quite willing to take the advice of an observant bystander.

  • lynn

    1 year ago

    Shifting the weight of responsibility

    What I find most interesting is this new 'framing' of the name away from the Worker's 'Compensation' Board to WorkSafeBC.

    This subtle shift in name tells the tale....and in changing the emphasis away from compensation it redirects both accountability and liability onto the worker.

    The onus is shifted away from the company in regard to safety and the consequent accountability/responsibility/compensation and towards the worker....an attempt to make the worker solely culpable and liable.

    The newly named WorkSafeBC has been framed this way to imply that if there is an injury, it is because the worker was not working safely enough and it shifts the weight of responsibility for safety on the job and on the job site onto the worker and away from the company/employer....and more importantly, it shifts accountability and thus decreases the likelihood that a worker will receive compensation for an injury suffered on the job.

    WorkSafeBC just reflects our present provincial government regressively ugly policies where the rights of business trump the rights of human beings.

    To cut to the chase, this is not about working safely.

    It's about money.

    It's a shift in focus created specifically to provide less and less compensation for workers....and more and more savings in insurance rates for business.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    lynn

    Quote:
    It's a shift in focus created specifically to provide less and less compensation for workers....and more and more savings in insurance rates for business

    And all the while making coverage by the (ex) WCB compulsory.

    "Free" enterprise at its finest!

  • lyle

    1 year ago

    Since the manager had no

    Since the manager had no concern for the safety of the young man, our reporter might have mentioned that the rag, and the cleaning solution, had contaminated the fries. That was something any customer could legitimately complain about, something the manager could not explain away, something that would cost the business money, and something that might have gotten the lad out from over the hot oil.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.