Life

Hated Words

Ask people their most reviled words and what you get is . . . art?

By Katharine Hamer, 20 May 2008, TheTyee.ca

Rebecca Lamarre

Rebecca Lamarre: 'People have a lot of issues.'

In a corner booth of a downtown Vancouver cafe, Rebecca Lamarre is musing aloud about the lingering effect her final project for Emily Carr University had on her communication style. "For a while, it messed up the way I was able to speak," she says, "because I was thinking about words the whole time -- I was worried I'd use the wrong word."

"I Don't Like the Word: An Investigation of Language Bias in Vancouver, British Columbia" is the Dadaist experiment the 21-year-old Lamarre devised for Emily Carr's annual undergraduate show. By placing envelopes at select locations around Vancouver, with an invitation for passersby to jot down their most reviled words, she hoped to prod respondents into clearing their linguistic detritus.

"I went with the negative because I feel like it's more important," she says. "I feel like if you get the negative out of the way, then you can decide what you really like. And it's also important to identify what you don't like and see how it affects you. If you ignore it, then it causes problems."

Lamarre first came up with the idea after filling a square in the Community Art Gallery's community art grid last year. "I thought it would be funny to see what kind of words people didn't like at an art gallery," she says. "I thought everyone would be really prim and proper, or they would try and show off and have really big words.

"But that wasn't the case -- it was all, like, 'fiancée' and 'visa' -- just regular, everyday stuff. I was really surprised -- my predictions were totally wrong. And so then I thought, 'I wonder what would happen if I put envelopes in different parts of the city, to see if there's any correlation between the location and the demographics that move through the space, the words that they don't like? Do people with higher education have more capacity for abstract thought? Is that related to income?'"

Universal loathing

What Lamarre wasn't expecting was that, from South Granville to Commercial Drive, from tattoo parlours to acting schools, almost everyone hated the same words.

Are you ready, Vancouverites? Your least favourite word is a tie between 'moist' and 'cunt' -- closely followed by 'panties,' 'hate' and 'no.'

"It's all to do with female body parts," says Lamarre, "which I think is really shocking -- I live a very sheltered art school existence, so I don't even think that it's a problem, ever, and then I go out into the real world and I [realize], 'Oh, people still really have a lot of issues with this.'"

Lamarre made a concerted effort to hit a variety of demographics in the locations where she left her envelopes. Capers, Starbucks and the Vancouver Art Gallery were all on the list, as were Buy-Low Foods, Banyan Books and Heartquest Wellness Centre. At some spots, her envelopes were stolen. At others, she was simply turned away. "I ended up being where I was allowed to be," she says. "I wanted to make sure I was legal about it the whole time."

No thanks, said public library

Public spaces, she says, were harder to tap into than commercial ones. At the Vancouver Public Library, her project proposal was sent to a committee for review. Three weeks later, the committee said no.

Lamarre thinks it would "absolutely" have been easier to ask about words that people do like. "That was one of the major questions," she concedes, 'Do you not like people? Do you hate the world? Are you depressed?' And I'm like, 'no!' And when I did it at the Vancouver Art Gallery, the stipulation was that I had to collect words that people did like first, and then I could ask them what they didn't like."

She discovered that words we do like include "horse," "mango," "chocolate" and "aurora."

Whether the words were positive or negative, some respondents related simply to their sound. Others focused more on meaning.

"The one that was the most distinct was the women's only gym," says Lamarre, "and it was all words like 'fat' and 'ugly' and 'stupid.' It was so depressing."

At a wellness centre on Commercial Drive, the word 'hate' showed up four times -- proof, says Lamarre, "that art is always political."

'Am I a freak?'

Little did Lamarre realize that her work also would thrust her into a quasi-therapeutic role. As a result of the project's web component, she observes, "I got this really long e-mail from this guy -- he said, 'I saw your website, and I think it's a really great idea and really fascinating. I was wondering, I don't know if I can ask you this, but I don't know if I'm weird, because I have words that I can't say, like "banana" and "mouth." I was wondering, am I a freak -- are there other people like me?'"

Lamarre hasn't quite figured out how to respond to that one yet, but she did get a thrill recently while quietly observing visitors to the Emily Carr show taking in her finished piece -- a collection of the reviled words, divided by origin, pinned to a board.

"It was fun just standing and just watching people looking at it," she recalls. "People would get really, really excited. [They would say] 'Oh, look at that word!' and they would giggle. 'Spatula,' people kept saying, 'why do people think spatula' is weird?'"

So what is Lamarre's least-favourite word? That would be "should."

"I don't like being told what to do," Lamarre says.

"I Don't Like the Word" was part of the exhibition Leave Room for the Holy Spirit, the off-site show of this year's Emily Carr graduates, which just wrapped at the Helen Pitt Gallery. More loathsome snippets can also be found at rlamarre.wordpress.com.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

30  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • cocean

    4 years ago

    Outraged

    That's my most hated word. It's gone way over the top in use in political circles and lost all meaning.

  • Booker

    4 years ago

    Spiritual

    It has so many meanings that it no longer has any.

    Are you spiritual?

  • BC Mary

    4 years ago

    Don't "How are you?" me! Not unless you really want to know!

    Oh, Thank you, Katherine Hamer. I began to think nobody would ever ask!

    How are yewwwww? That's what I hate.

    Shows interest, you say? Like hell. One morning I gave myself a severe talking-to. I said: "You could make the effort to go along. Just say 'Fine thank you!', smile, and continue with your business."

    So -- determined to be agreeable -- I went to the bank and was confronted by the nice lady who greets everybody at the door with "How are yewwwww?" Once I had barked "Fine!" she let me pass. But when I got to the teller, the teller of course (obviously under orders) said "How are yewwwww?" again.

    Well, I was going to recite "Fine, thank you" ... but suddenly I realized I'd be talking to her ear, as she had already turned to speak to the teller next to her. By the time she had finished with that important business, she had mercifully forgotten to appear to be giving a damn how I am.

    And that's the thing of it. People who ask Howryewww 500 times a day don't give a damn. How could they? Maybe once, long ago, it was a wonderful, caring thing to ask after someone's well-being. But it isn't anymore ... now it's the opposite ... now it says "Let me show you how much I don't give a damn!" I know this because sometimes it's spoken in a singsong which declares "I gotta say this but I don't enjoy saying this."

    And there are days when a person's health is fragile, when your knees shake and your heart can't keep its proper rythmn and you're scared you aren't going to make it home. How does that heartless throw-away comment sound then?

    Well, Katherine, I can answer that, too. Telling people you don't give a damn about them, while acting out a pretense that you do, sounds like an invitation to punch somebody in the nose while shouting "There! Does that tell ya how I am??"

    Because there are days when we don't feel well, when we're grieving or worried, and when we'd love to have someone really ask: "How [/i][/b]are[i][b] you, Mary?" People can tell the difference.

    Recently someone I love phoned up and asked "How are you?" It wasn't a throw-away line but I knew he had a low tolerance for chit-chat. So I said "Oh, I'm OK." He lowered his voice and emphasized his words: "No, I mean, how are you?" Then I knew he would listen. And the listening made me feel much, much better.

    And that's the thing of it: hypocritizing such a caring remark is really not OK. It can turn "I love you" into "Phttt. Like I care." Not OK. So I'm agin it.

    Maybe next-worst (and it's pretty much disappeared, hasn't it?) was that ubiquitous "There you go" in cheap cafes when your hamburger arrived.

    "Have a nice day" seems to have died a natural death.

    But I'm sure you won't be surprised that I get clenched-fist and slit-eyed when my restaurant dinner arrives and somebody barks "Enjoy!" Huh. "Maybe I will, maybe I won't, but I'll decide that," I think to myself, as I mumble "Thank you."

    Sigh. [i][b]

  • Stump

    4 years ago

    Kids say the darndest things

    As a parent of a six-year old... 'why' is sure wearing out its welcome. Grandma just smiles and assures me it's payback from the gods for my own inquisitive nature.

    I wish we had a better word than cunt. Something powerful and sexy too. Seems unfair that guys get 'cock' (cock of the walk, cock a gun, etc) and women get saddled with the dreaded 'c-word'.

  • anarcho

    4 years ago

    Some other bad words

    How about "war," surely the most obscene of words? Then what about "bosses", "authoritarianism", "empire" or "capitalism"? All of which are vile, creepy and cruel.

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    cocean, I totally agree.

    cocean, I totally agree. I'd lump the word "heinous" in there too. Every crime reported by journalists is now "heinous", and every death is a "tragedy". "Transgressive" is another outmoded banality, and "offensive" isn't far behind. "Community" has totally lost its meaning (i.e. the legal "community"; the drug-user "community"; the LGBTXYZ "community").

    Nothing quite beats the visceral phonetic crudity of "cunt". We routinely refer to men with equally crude images (dick, asshole, prick), but nothing quite matches the savage Dionysian potency of that word (or its ancient and near-universal heritage...it's the word that can't be killed, even after whole cultures and languages have gone extinct).

  • nightbloom

    4 years ago

    How could I forget...

    ...I'd also add the words "fag" and "faggot" as words I can't stand. They far outstrip "cunt" in the degree of poison they can contain (contingent on context, of course).

    Actually, now that I think about it, my all-time most hated word is the N-word. And that doesn't depend on context!

  • frank2

    4 years ago

    Bush

    Bush

  • ME2

    4 years ago

    Revisioning

    Well, it has only recently begun to get on my nerves, but now when I hear, see or read the joyous pronouncement that...."The Toronto Stock Market has just reached its highest level in history" - yet again - I want to puke.

    Since every notch up means a greater spread between ME and THEM, WTF should I, upon hearing this good news, immediately fall to my knees and salamn Eastward in routine thankfulness for the benfecence of the Gods dwelling on Bay Street?

  • Growlhisss

    4 years ago

    Broad, faggot, wicked (as in

    Broad, faggot, wicked (as in that is so wicked, duuuude)

  • ubiquitous

    4 years ago

    amazing

    1. aMAZing - with emphasis on the second syllable

    2. 'thoughts and prayers' - there's just something insincere when you see a tv reporter reading this off a teleprompter to close out some tragic news.

  • zalm

    4 years ago

    Grade? F

    That's the grade Hamer gets from me. Any Dadaist interpretation of language - Dadaism itself being a rejection of experience based solely on the language used - is as invalid as art as a bowel movement. It's an interpretation of an interpretation.

    As Pareyson says, the freedom of interpretation is anything BUT arbitrary and brings with it risk and responsibility. Heidigger and Gadamer argued over this years ago and Gadamer was unable to make a proper dent in Heidegger's assertion that interpretation arises primarily from Being, rather than Language as Gadamer asserted.

    An art student unaware of this argument against Dadaism (surely the most nihilistic, childish, and therefore useless of viewpoints) can scarcely be considered to see the world profitably in terms of opening doors to meaning and evaluation. The business of language is risky, as scribes prove in the daily rags every day. For artists, it's a Faustian pit of no return.

    Set out with no goal, and what you get is no result. Big surprise.

  • snert

    4 years ago

    They all depend on context.

    Quote:
    And that doesn't depend on context!

    We have the ability to take any word and misuse or abuse it.

    To me blanket objections to words are silly primarily because the context is often ignored and people just will not let their own prejudices go.

    Even the 'N' has useful applications if used without malice.

  • G West

    4 years ago

    please, name some non-malicious and

    useful applications for that word.

    I invite respectful replies to my posts at Tyee.

    G West

  • Palharry

    4 years ago

    unacceptable

    [/b]unacceptable[b] This word is used almost exclusively by politicians. Hmmm.... I don't know why but "veggie" really bugs me.

  • snert

    4 years ago

    You can look 'em up.

    Go for it.

  • BC Mary

    4 years ago

    One more word ...

    ... at least, I think this is a word. Or perhaps it's a bodily function.

    It happens when people's eyes go blank and their expressionless mouths open wide as they hoot:

    Wooooooooooooooooo!

    honest to god, when I see a crowd doing Woooooooo! I fear for the future of the human race, as I believe it's intended to be an expression of joy.

    .

  • notamused

    4 years ago

    Wooooooooooooooooo!

    I believe Jeff Foxworthy translated that word from Redneck into English as "I've got a beer in one hand and a spit cup in the other, and can't clap."

    My son, when he was a toddler, used to scream when anyone used the words "brunch" or "kilometre".

  • Bailey

    4 years ago

    Faithbased

    It never bodes anybody any good.

    Especially when paired with 'initiative'.

  • G West

    4 years ago

    snert

    There aren't any.

    My most hated phrase is 'at this point in time.'

  • snert

    4 years ago

    G West

    In your opinion.

    You forget that any word can be misused.

    Here's one for you 'politically correct.'

  • ME2

    4 years ago

    The "N" word.

    Snert thinks, and I agree :

    "Even the 'N' has useful applications if used without malice."

    But GWest thinks otherwise, and I disagree with him :

    "please, name some non-malicious and useful applications for that word".

    Since that word is so emblemmatic of the treatment US blacks received in Jim Crow days, and since it is still widely used by racists, how would one explain without using the word to someone unfamiliar with it - esp in years to come - the hurtfulness wrapped up in it? As others here have noted, context is everything.

    But far more important is the idea that all words carry meanings necessary for communication, and whether or not one likes the meaning of a word has nothing to do with whether it should be kept or saved, or even avoided in "polite conversation".

    The Bowldleriser of languages is usually a poseur whose objectives are no different than those of the Censor, and I've found this to be particularly true re discussions of FN issues.

    You will all notice I have avoided using the word here, but that self-censorship is only because everyone here knows the word referred to, and I know it offends some.

    However, if it was necessary to make a point, I would not hesitate to use it, and then let the reader make his/her judgement as to its use.

  • G West

    4 years ago

    I'm still not aware, ME2

    ...of a single usage of the word 'nigger' in normal colloquial speech that does not involve some kind of malice, threat or negative connotation.

    Apart from the odd book title, such as Conrad's 'The Nigger of the Narcissus' and 'White Niggers of America' by Pierre Vallieres - both of which use the word in a 'particular' and not un-ironic sense - I can't see much reason to use the word in any polite and un-academic or history-critical way.

    But that's not the sense in which snert brought it up. Remember, what he did write was this:
    Even the 'N' has useful applications if used without malice.

    I'm aware of the argot of 'nigger' in hip hop culture and its appropriation by certain segments of the American 'black' community but I'd assert that, even there, the word is freighted with connotations which are seldom not all that far from malice.

    In any case, I'm still waiting for snert's list of appropriate and nonmalicious, and, as he put it, useful, examples of 'nigger' in actual usage.

    I don't think relegating such words - along with others such as squaw, brave, and papoose, 'Mammy', pickinini and the like to the dustbin of history (cultural and linguistic) and the pages of the OED - is a bad thing.

    Which was, after all, the only point I was trying to make.

    I welcome respectful comments to my posts at Tyee, especially thoughtful ones like yours just above.

    G West

  • snert

    4 years ago

    It should read

    'Nigger is currently a derogatory term' but other than that Wiki has a pretty good description of how the word has been used and not all uses were malicious.

    It is a very handy word to use synonymously for oppression and slavery which is not in and of itself racially derogatory.

    Oddly enough, or maybe not, the word 'black' can be substituted and used just as maliciously as the word currently under discussion has been. When are you going to try to get it 'relegated to the dustbin of history?'

    It's not the word that is the problem but how it is used. Address that issue and quit trying to rewrite the dictionary.

  • G West

    4 years ago

    still no list snert

    How come? Relying upon a self-edited 'resource' like wikipedia is a facile defence of a largely indefensible position.

    No one is trying to re-write the dictionary - please note reference to the Oxford English Dictionary in my post. Words like 'nigger' and certain others (my list is far from exhaustive) will always retain a place in the annals of humans’ careless mistreatment of their fellow men and women: Nothing strange or revisionist about that.

    Furthermore, English is the most supple and changeable of languages - something more than 360,000 words and definitions have been added (and many subtracted) from the lexicon since Dr Johnson published his dictionary. In other words, it is the most re-written and changeable of all languages - a fact which probably explains, at least in part, its current ubiquity. Unlike French, there is no ‘English’ academy riding herd on the tongue as the Académie française has done for French since 1635.

    It's entirely appropriate that words like 'nigger' should fall out of use - along with the ideas and concepts with which they have been associated.

    We're talking normal common usage - not literary or historical references, a point which, you'll note, was also made in my post.

    Consequently, I'll continue to wait for the evidence - I haven't seen any yet.

    In the meantime, I'll assume the initial clause in your first sentence is as close to capitulation as you are likely to admit.

    I welcome respectful responses to my posts here at Tyee.

    G West

  • Stump

    4 years ago

    Out with the Olde

    Forsooth, me thinks thy supposition that thine word 'nigger' have place and purpose doth have little to recommend it.

    Verily, let it reside in yon dictionaries as fair warning and gentle reminder to all good people that words carry weight and some be freighted with more evil than good. But gentle folk, it need not be uttered for any good purpose and watching it passeth into history presents no great harm.

    I bid you sir, good day... or as we like to say here in the 21st C.

    peace out

  • snert

    4 years ago

    Still no list.

    So all the information found at that link is wrong, in your opinion.

    Quote:
    Relying upon a self-edited 'resource' like wikipedia is a facile defence of a largely indefensible position.

    One should be careful to not go cross-eyed when looking down their nose.

  • ME2

    4 years ago

    POV

    Maybe, Snert, if one's nose is long enough, one might easily confuse parallax with tunnel-vision. :-)

  • Bailey

    4 years ago

    Dear Stump

    You mention 'cunt' as the most hateful word. Lexicographers seem to agree that that one is most taboo. It was the last word admitted to published dictionaries from the list of banned Saxon words.

    After the Norman conquest, Saxon terms for body function and for social function were considered rude, and the French equivalent substituted. 'Shit' was banned, and 'manure' not. 'Cunt' was banned while 'vagina' remained acceptable. Mostly words referring to physical things.

    Gradually over the last century or so these words began finally showing up in published dictionaries, except that one.

    That word 'cunt' was the very last one to be granted acknowledgement in published dictionaries, by a long way. In some way, it must have been considered by editors and lexicographers, the absolute highest authorities on words, to be the most offensive of them all.

    Now that it has been included, I'm not aware of any other words which are still banned in that way.

  • ME2

    4 years ago

    another word

    Here's a word I haven't heard since my teenage days, and which I doubt is welcomed in polite society even now.

    Smegma.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.