Life

Cooking Up New Collective Kitchens

Tasty social change, one meal at a time.

By Kelly Ebbels, 16 Feb 2007, The McGill Daily

Best of Campus Press

[Editor's note: This year, the John H. Macdonald foundation launched national awards for excellence in Canadian University Press student journalism. The Tyee sponsored two new awards: The Tyee Solutions Oriented Writing Award and the Tyee Investigative Writing Award. This article was runner-up for the Tyee Solutions Oriented Writing award. We'll run the winner next week.]

In 1985, in the Montreal east-end district of Hochelaga-Maisonneuve, three women with limited money and time found themselves unable to properly feed their families. To cut down on costs, they decided to buy their food in bulk and cook together for an afternoon. They found that this was not only economical, but that it was infinitely more enjoyable to cook in the company of friends.

The idea grabbed the attention of others in the neighbourhood, including local nutritionist Diane Norman, who began working to spread the collective cooking concept. Three years later, there were at least 20 collective kitchen groups in community centres around Montreal. In 1990, the groups formed a provincial lobby -- the Regroupement des cuisines collectives du Québec (RCCQ) -- to co-ordinate their activities and share information. Soon after, Norman set out to encourage other Canadian communities to do the same.

Since then, collective kitchens have caught on elsewhere. Some have survived, while others have died off. But only in Quebec can the collective cooking concept boast a strong movement that sees itself as a path to social empowerment.

A hit recipe

"When you're alone, it's easier to be ignorant of your potential. You don't know your powers, your strengths, what you're capable of," Mélanie Lamoureux explains to me as we sit in the kitchen and eating space of the Ahuntsic Community Centre, where the Service de nutrition et d'action communautaire, or SNAC, hosts its cooking groups.

She continues, "But when you're with a group, you get the opportunity to be fed with the experiences, the knowledge of others." She takes a bite of the macaroni and homemade sausage -- her grandmother's recipe -- that she had prepared with her mother and aunt. Her enthusiasm for healthy and accessible food was infectious -- before I knew it, two hours had flown by.

This is the mindset behind the collective kitchen, which the RCCQ defines as a group of four to six people who meet to plan, shop for and cook meals in large quantities for themselves, and in some cases for their families.

Those who join a cooking group pay a small yearly membership of about five dollars, plus the cost of the ingredients. The only other requirement is that they be from the borough or region from which that collective kitchen works.

At the end of cooking sessions, each person leaves with several meals, about 10 to 15 portions, the latter costing anywhere from 60 cents to about two dollars a each, depending on the interests and budget of each group.

Combine the ingredients

The groups are anything but homogenous.

Though mostly women use collective kitchens, men make up a significant minority. At SNAC, for example, Lamoureux estimated that about 25 per cent of the participants were men.

And while collective kitchens were originally born out of a financial necessity, these groups are not just composed of people struggling with a limited budget. Indeed, there are many groups that cook organic food together, vegetarian food, diabetic-friendly food or even baby food.

Moreover, organizers like Lamoureux often try to incorporate people of different cultural or social backgrounds, which leads to a richer experience and education about food.

"Anyone you can imagine in society, you see here at the collective kitchens. The more diverse, the more rich the groups are, the more powerful they are," she said.

Mix thoroughly

With increased media coverage of food issues in the past few years, many now realize the value of eating a healthy meal. But fewer people than before actually know how to cook. For these people, a collective kitchen can be a place to learn skills and practice new recipes.

While, as of 2004, there were officially 1,350 collective kitchens under the RCCQ, Guyane Marcoux, the director of promotions and development at RCCQ, estimated that the number has since doubled. In the Lac Saint-Jean region, for example, the number of collective cooking groups has jumped from 15 to 60 in the last two years. In other places, there is a waiting list to join a cooking group.

"It's crazy, we've never been this busy," says Marcoux with a laugh. "We're a victim of our own success."

Yet in the rest of Canada, and the United States, collective cooking has garnered some successes, but not to the same extent as here in Quebec.

Bring to a boil

I spoke with Rachel Engler-Stringer, who conducted her doctoral research at the University of Saskatchewan on collective kitchens in Toronto, Saskatoon and Montreal.

She found that in Saskatoon, mostly lower-income groups or people with mental illness benefited from the collective kitchen model. While there is a central lobby group similar to the RCCQ in Saskatchewan, it is desperately underfunded and understaffed.

In Toronto, collective kitchens mostly focus on new immigrant populations. There is no central lobby group and very little social aid coming from the government. There, volunteer-staffed kitchen co-operatives have a very low probability of surviving longer than a year, she found.

In Montreal, however, the RCCQ has five fully-paid staff members and receives funding from both Centraide -- the province's largest charity network -- and the government. With a strong central lobby, these kitchens can work for increased funding from the provincial government while working to create unity and offer support for struggling groups.

Uncover and let simmer

As was the case for many social and community programs, the nineties proved to be formative years for Quebec's collective kitchens.

"In the '90s, the political atmosphere was very different in Quebec," Engler-Stringer says. "The government was relatively progressive compared to other provinces." She pointed to the Ontario of the 1990s under Conservative Premier Mike Harris, where almost all budgets for social aid programs were cut in some form.

"But here in Quebec, they were getting more funding -- money for supplies, for space. They were building community organizations in Quebec, whereas in Ontario, they were destroying them."

Jean-Marie Chapeau, a planning and development officer at Centraide's allocation department, said the organization gives about $100,000 to the RCCQ directly, which goes toward supporting emerging kitchens and better-equipping old ones with quality cooking utensils.

Chapeau said that much of the success of the collective kitchen movement in Quebec could be attributed to the RCCQ.

"They do tremendous work to encourage the development of new groups, especially in the more challenging places, like the West Island," he said.

Serve with social change

As collective kitchens began blossoming across the province during the '90s, RCCQ's members felt the need to identify themselves more accurately. At their 2000 General Assembly, the RCCQ, realizing there were certain traits found in successful collective kitchens that did not exist in those that failed, adopted five standard values: solidarity, democracy, equity and social justice, autonomy, and respect and human dignity.

Lamoureux, of SNAC, explained that these values play out in the social cooking atmosphere of each group and that participants are encouraged to apply the values to their everyday lives.

"We try to live these values in our lives. We can use them to solve problems, for organization, interpersonal relationships, decision-making, planning. It's an empowerment -- it's a concept we talk a lot about, but it's not something that's well-understood by the citizens. Through RCCQ it's easier to appropriate the concepts."

Marcoux, of RCCQ, has noticed results.

"I believe, now, that food is only a pretext. When I started here, and began working with new kitchens, it became so obvious that people came for one reason, but that they stayed for another," she says.

Beyond any food bank, beyond any social welfare program, a community kitchen enables people to lift themselves out of isolation, poverty or loneliness. As Lamoureux told me:

"You can experience a situation that lets you be conscious of your talents, strengths, knowledge, and changing your collective cooking group but also your family, your work, your neighbourhood and your society. Then you can say to yourself: 'Yes, I can change my world.'"

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

5  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    A Fantastic FIVE STARS out of a possible 5-star rating!

    Thank goodness, this story came up so soon after the DTES Photo Gallery ... because this story gives the reader inspiration, a game plan, and a GPS for finding at least one way to change the world.

    I'm also delighted to learn that this may have been one of the results of our contributions to The Tyee's journalism sponsorships.

    Couldn't be more pleased. So: FIVE out of 5 stars.

  • Cycling Commuter

    5 years ago

    Lift people out of poverty instead of warehousing them.

    Collective cooking is a brilliant concept.

    We also occasionally make a 5 gallon pot of soup, split it up into meal-size portions in wide-mouth canning jars with reusable white nylon storage lids then freeze them. As long as the jars are the wide-mouth type and some room is left for expansion at the top, the slightly-tapered jars don't crack when the soup freezes. There's less wastage and it takes a lot less time and work compared to making a pot of soup every day. It's also a good way to enjoy backyard-grown veggies year-round.

    Freezing works well for soup, but not for salads. So collective salads are a smart way to go. And collective fresh soups would be good when veggies are in-season.

    Another way to save money on food is to get a mushroom growing kit. This consists of professionally pre-seeded/spawned soil and fertilizer in a cardboard box, ready to grow. A kit can produce huge amounts of mushrooms as soon as you add a little water and stash the box in the back of a dark closet. There's no work involved other than adding the water. Over the course of 3 months or so, a $10 kit produces $50 - $100 worth of fresh mushrooms in moderately-sized batches every week or two. The nutrition and taste of freshly picked mushrooms is vastly superior to mushrooms that have sat in a supermarket for half a week after spending several days being hauled around in trucks from producer to warehouse to supermarket.

    When the mushroom kit stops producing, just buy a new kit and recycle the cardboard. The soil in the old kit still has enough nutrients to use in a backyard greenhouse to grow tomatoes, lettuce, etc.

    Fine cooking is a lot like art in that it requires creativity and sensitivity on the part of the cook. Many down and out people view themselves as unemployed or underemployed artists. Trouble is, there are far more people who want to create paintings than there are walls to hang the canvas on. But there's always lots of demand for chefs who can create nutritious, delicious meals. Unemployed artsy types who learn cooking skills in a collective kitchen get the immediate benefit of nutrition and social support. In the long term, some may acquire the skills for solid, well-paid careers as chefs while continuing with their canvas artworks in their spare time.

    Either way, if some of the multimillions of tax dollars that are spent hiring more and more cops to chase street people around in circles was redirected to supporting a community cooking system, the overall cost-benefit would likely be excellent. Even if the only benefit is to keep street people busy and out of trouble while they're cooking a nice dinner together with some outside guidance, that alone would be worth it. Other spinoff benefits such as reduced healthcare costs due to better nutrition, acquisition of better social/cooperation/networking/cooking skills would be a bonus. Since it provides benefits in all three areas, funding for community cooking initiatives should come out of policing, healthcare, and vocational training budgets.

    One of the most upscale restaurants in Toronto is located in a hi-rise building. Many of the ingredients used by the restaurant are grown in a greenhouse on the roof of the same building. That's a good reason to include some greenhouse growing skills with the cooking skills.

    Getting back to the artistic side of things, after cigarette vending machines were banned in Quebec restaurants, an enterprising individual modified some machines to sell tiny books and pieces of art. This was done by indie publisher Louis Rastelli who is an administrator with the non-profit group Archive Montreal. See: http://www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2003/012303/visualarts.html

    Here's a link to another inspirational story from the Victoria Times Colonist about a very succesful program that is lifting people out of the poverty trap.

    http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/capital_van_isl/story.html?id=9328369f-ea4b-4d83-8e7c-04d7a9a57cf8

    The headline is "Seminar helps to open doors to home ownership." Writer is Carolyn Heiman. Publication date is Wednesday, February 07, 2007. This article is a must-read for anyone who's interested in fighting poverty by empowering people instead of permanently entrenching helplessness and poverty with the usual human warehousing approach. The system is designed for families with incomes as low as $15,000 per year.

    VanCity's Springboard Mortgage helps families with no down payment who can afford modest mortgage payments. One participant is saving $20 per month, matched by VanCity. As her income rises so does her rent in subsidized housing. The difference between the old rent and the new rent is put into a savings account to be returned to her when the program is completed. The savings will be used as a down-payment to buy a home for this single mother and her child.

    As longtime credit union members, we're proud to see a small chunk of our mortgage payments going toward supporting such programs. This is one of many reasons why we always deal with credit unions instead of banks. It's impossible to imagine a bank setting up a similar system, regardless of how many tens of billions of dollars per year in profits they're making.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Excellent ideas and interesting directions

    Thanks Cycling Commuter,

    Are you aware of Alice Waters' work in Berkeley?
    http://www.chezpanissefoundation.org/

    It is perhaps a bit up-scale and has attracted a lot of 'gourmet' cachet, but worthwhile nonetheless.

    Building strong relationships is, in the end, the ket to building strong communities and a decent future.

    Progressives need to keep that in mind as well.

    Further, those who wish to actually build community need to remember that we 'share' resources, ideas and life experiences, it is never effective, long term, if all the 'teacher' does in these equations is show the target audience how to solve their problems.

    That's the problem with right-wing ideas and philosophies, they almost always forget this and emphasize the one size fits all nature of their 'solutions'.

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    My secret dream ...

    Here it comes ... my secret dream for a brave new world ... and I've had this dream since I was old enough to cook for myself.

    My dream was a communal kitchen. Lots of communal kitchens which would be so commonplace even in Vancouver that they'd be used as naturally as one's own kitchen.

    I dreamed of being taught how to cook there; and taking turns to cook or clean up there (becaue after all, it's a co-op venture); but mostly I dreamt of not being young and alone in the big city, of joining into the communities coming in to eat together, chat up the latest news, and create the links that make a neighbourhood.

    I tried to imagine how much time and money this would save ... a lot, I still think. Especially if health care is included in the math.

    My youthful dream always foundered on the rock of: where could these kitchens be established? In a neglected community hall? an old church? a restaurant which needed revitalizing? In Vancouver, where?

    No doubt about it, it'd take organization. And co-operation. But I still think it could be done, to great advantage. Imagine: no kids going to school hungry. No Moms or Dads frazzled and exhausted not only with the nonstop repetitious cooking but also the hauling home of groceries. No unhealthy fast foods. Not so much isolation and loneliness, even in a city. And all the different foods.

    Cycling Commuter has some wonderful tips (above). I'd just like to add this observation. I am fortunate enough to live amongst many overworked musicians and artists whose working lives are intense and demanding. It is astonishing to me that they find their greatest relaxation in fine cookery -- staying home, inviting friends in, and with elbows on the table, having an evening filled with news, views, anecdotes and laughter ... and in exchanging recipes.

    So in my Dream of a Perfect World where nobody is hungry or lonely, I'd have the Collective Kitchens running 24/7, which would make it possible for people to stay home for ... well, for the place where their special, once-in-a-while cookery is the focal point for major personal celebrations.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Sounds like a plan to me...

    And something that I thought, when I lived there, that folks in Quebec might well be the Canadians who'd be leaders - as it seems they are - in that kind of thing.

    Generally keeping community alive I mean. Although I'm sure there are examples in other parts of the country too, eh Mary.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.