Artsculture

Sin City? Absolve Yourself

And pray someone can do better that with newfangled CGI.

By Steve Burgess, 4 Apr 2005, TheTyee.ca

sincity

“After awhile all I’m doing is pounding wet chunks of bone into the floorboards.”

If that strikes you as a laugh line, I’ll bet you were sitting behind me Friday night at the Capitol Six. Sin City is one of those disturbing films where the most disturbing thing is the audience. The geeks were all out for opening night, and why not? This is a geek movie. Sin City is not so much a film as a tribute to style, the kind of homage geeks pay to the things they love.

Sin City started as Frank Miller’s nasty comic book vision of crime and sleaze. Since the graphic novels were executed in the manner of film noir classics, it only made sense that they should come full circle. Director Robert Rodriguez has made the screen transfer as faithfully as he could and the results are interesting, at least.

“Guest director” Quentin Tarantino helmed only one scene in the movie, but his stink is all over it. Sin City apes the Pulp Fiction structure of separate stories told sequentially, intertwining as they go (whether Pulp Fiction was a case of Tarantino aping Miller I will let cultural historians decipher). In one story hard-boiled cop Bruce Willis saves a little girl from a creep with big connections. Then in the most successful sequence a nearly-unrecognizable Mickey Rourke (looking very much like that other recent comic book film star, Hellboy) tracks the killer of his favorite hooker. Clive Owen teams up with a bevy of homicidal whores to protect their red-light turf; then Willis is back for the conclusion of his tragic tale. It’s all just as hard-boiled as a petrified egg.

A poke in the CGI

Sin City is the latest in a new generation of CGI movies, created in computers after actors have pranced around in front of blue and green screens. Compared to a tricked-up piece of garbage like Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, Sin City is an epic. But that’s a comparison that would make a toilet-paper ad look good.

I am not a big fan of CGI—its siren promise often lures filmmakers onto the rocks. Too often the results resemble Sky Captain’s insipid cocktail of all wizardry and no script (mixed with a few of the howlers that result when actors can’t see what they’re doing. Witness Gwyneth Paltrow in Sky Captain, playing reporter Polly Perkins in an aircraft scene. After a full-screen shot of a huge flashing indicator marked Fuel Warning Light, the allegedly intrepid reporter asks her pilot: “Is that light supposed to be on?”).

Sin City goes for a noirer-than-thou look of stark shadows, white light, and artistic splashes of colour. But that’s not really film noir—it’s comic book. In fact the otherworldly look of Sin City frequently brings to mind not the dark classics of the 40’s, but modern science fiction.

Excess material

More problematic is the essential geek nature of the film. It’s a tribute to a beloved style, and it rolls around in that style like a dog on a dead fish. Just as you’re trying to immerse yourself in the flow, hard-boiled dialogue soars over the top and makes you groan. Action sequences aim for style and excess—always excess. The result makes you wonder if the filmmakers truly love the dark classics like Double Indemnity or The Glass Key. If so, they’ve failed badly—Sin City is far too concerned with surface to capture the experience of those great movies.

As for the guffawing crowd, perhaps they were just exploring the dark connection between the slapstick comedy of the Three Stooges and the ultra-violence of modern comic-book style. I hope in future they’ll explore that connection via DVD, or at least at the matinee.

When not wandering afar, Steve Burgess writes regularly for The Tyee about television and film.  [Tyee]

7  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Yammer

    7 years ago

    Comments on "Sin City? Absolve Yourself"

    You're judging this CG-background thing way too early. It'd be like someone coming across Steamboat Willie and saying, "Yeah, it's got sound and motion, but it lacks the dramatic depth and tension of Jane Austen."

    AFAIK, there have been precisely two movies filmed this way, with the third -- Revenge of the Sith -- heading out in the summer. Considering the genre, the geek factor is assured, but that's not CG's fault.

    Sky Captain was made for a relative pittance. I've heard that it was made for way under $20 million. You could make the original Star Wars today on a Mac.

    That's great news for filmmakers. It means that there are few, if any, real limitations for setting. You don't need to go to Hollywood or a major studio to shoot a period piece, say, or an action sequence.

    As Ebert writes in his current column, he just learnt that Michelle Tractorpull or whatever he name is was "face placed" on stunt doubles to do the skating sequences for Ice Princess. He didn't notice it. THAT'S what CG is really good for, I think. Today's initial films are technology testbeds, but how long will this phase last? Only until more filmmakers start to realize what a godsend they have in digital video.

  • Steve Burgess

    7 years ago

    Yammer, my dislike of CG effects is not restricted to total-CG movies like this one or Sky Captain (by the way, I think there are a number of others that could qualify--I wonder if we might even include the primitive technology of Tron in that category). I dislike the use of obvious CG effects where filmmakers do something just because they can, like making some errant car part fly straight at the camera. It takes you out of the movie--it's like 3D House of Wax or something. But it's true that these effects can be properly used. I would say that the best examples I've seen are the ones I didn't know I was seeing. There have been times when I was pleasantly surprised to find out later that I was watching CG effects. Missed Michelle Trackenwack and her skating thingy.

  • finger_jab

    7 years ago

    yammer, there have been two HOLLYWOOD movies filmed with this technique, but there have actually been many worldwide, including the french movie "immortel" (2004) and the japanese movie "casshern" (2004).

  • Yammer

    7 years ago

    Thanks, Finger. I had heard of Casshern but didn't know much about it.

    Green/blue screen is old, of course -- remember the terrible process shots of 50s movies? -- it just looks good enough to use more often.

    Burgess - Tron had all-CG sequences (e.g. the light cycles) but I think it was beaten to the screen by Star Trek II (the Genesis wave tape). Most of Tron was conventionally shot on black and white film stock, which was then meticulously rotoscoped by hand to add the glowing effects.

  • alexwh

    7 years ago

    Sin City is far too concerned with surface to capture the experience of those great movies.

    I applaud that accurate statement by Mr Burgess. I would only hope that the Tyee executive stop spending so much time and wasting this literate critic on US entertainment that is more often than not concerned with surface. If the Tyee is to diverge from local media let it place more energy in the films of other nations. After a week of just perusing our newspapers I feel I have seen Sin City a million times.

  • Jeffrey J.

    7 years ago

    While I applaud the directors for standing up to the religious right and related censorship groups, I was dismayed at the overwhelming sexualization of women in the film. What redeems Tarantino's Kill Bill films is women are the heroes. That is completely lacking in Sin City, and by the look on the face of many of the young women I saw leave the theatre, they'll not be going back any time soon. Can't blame them.

  • Fii

    7 years ago

    I read that in a review, Jeffrey- what disappoints me is it is the #1 film in Canada!! and today a friend and I were going to see a movie and she said she wanted to see Sin City! I told her I read it was pretty anti-women and she said "Oh, but I want to see it anyway." Why?? Because of all the hype? Why did all those women you saw coming out of the theatre go in the first place?? (Was it a fairly young crowd?) I refuse to see it; I told one of my male friends I'd heard it was pretty misogynistic and so far he's held out. We'll see. So we saw Sideways today. Enjoyed it very much.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.