- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joel Berger is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Fifty Drops at a Time
Reflections of a contributor to 'Walk Myself Home: An Anthology to End Violence Against Women.'
Surviving and resisting: New book collects 50 voices.
- Walk Myself Home: An Anthology to End Violence Against Women
- Caitlin Press (2010)
When I was growing up, I'd sometimes come home after school to find newspaper clippings placed on my bed. My mother would read the paper, find articles about rape, and then put them on my pillow. The stories were always tersely worded, horrifying and unforgettable: a single mother living in a basement suite raped while her young children were asleep nearby; a young woman found unconscious and sexually assaulted beneath a bush after a party; a 14-year-old girl imprisoned for months in her neighbour's cellar.
I assumed that my mother intended that these articles inform and warn me, and hence protect me from the fate suffered by the victims in the articles. I was supposed to refuse candy from strangers, walk warily around hedges, avoid ever sleeping in a main floor or basement suite, and decline invitations to large parties and rock concerts. My mother told me many times of how terrified the women in her family were during the Japanese invasion of Hong Kong during the Second World War. She told me how puzzled she was as a child watching them smear themselves with feces and urine taken from their chamber pots before the soldiers came banging on the door on their hunt for women. Like many who had witnessed and survived war, my mother viewed the world as a dangerous, unpredictable place.
At the time, I didn't find this unusual -- thought all mothers cut out these kinds of articles and told stories like these to their daughters. In fact, I thought it was so normal to hear and read about sexual violence that I obliviously bought a paperback copy of Helter Skelter from the corner store once, as a present for a friend's birthday during grade six. My friend's mother immediately snatched it away, and eyed me suspiciously from then on. I don't recall being invited back to their home again.
When I tell this story to friends, they are often incredulous. They laugh, and I laugh with them. But the fact is, even after I moved away from home, the stories were everywhere. I didn't need to look on my pillow anymore. The stories of violence against women were there whenever I opened the newspaper or turned on the news, right through to my first year criminal law course at law school, when we discussed sexual assault cases like Pappajohn v. R. and Sansregret v. R. where judges and academics debated whether drunk or knife-wielding men had an "honest" and "reasonable" belief in their victims' consent. I heard it in the voice of a friend's father who muttered surreptitious threats in Korean (under the indifferent and impatient gaze of a police officer) to his 50-year-old wife as she frantically packed her bags, trying to flee before he tried to strangle her again. And of course, on Dec. 6, 1989, an armed gunman with a stated vendetta against feminists walked into a classroom at Montreal's École Polytechnique, separated the women engineering students from the men and systematically shot all the women, then went on a rampage through the school, targeting women specifically, murdering a total of 14 women and injuring ten other women and four men.
A hummingbird's example
Twenty years later, although police and school protocols to handle armed intruders have improved, not much else has changed. The stories in the news are the same or worse, whether they are local or international -- about transcripts of Robert Pickton's conversations with an undercover cop, the recent trial of Colonel Russell Williams, the spread of images of the gang rape victim in Pitt Meadows that were posted on the internet, to continuing reports of soldiers using rape to destroy families and communities in the Sudan or the DRC. It doesn't seem as if the government, the police, the legal system, or the laws themselves can ever adequately address the consequences, let alone the root causes, of sexual violence.
Like many, I have often felt powerless because the problem seems entrenched and insurmountable. I have often wondered how to make a difference, how to understand and effectively address those root causes. I'd written only a few pieces on the subject. But then that fable came to mind, about the hummingbird who does all that it can flying back and forth between the river and a forest fire, picking up individual droplets of water to try to put out the flames. Eventually enough droplets from enough sources with concerted effort can make a difference.
In that spirit, Andrea Routley, the co-founder of the LoudSpeaker Festival of music, theatre and poetry in celebration of International Women's Day, had the idea of putting together a chapbook of poems and stories to sell at the next festival in Victoria, B.C. The project blossomed into a book-length anthology published this fall by Caitlin Press entitled Walk Myself Home: An Anthology to End Violence Against Women. In the introduction to the book, Routley states that "by identifying violence against women in all its forms -- from put-downs and inappropriate workplace humour to physical abuse -- we will recognize it when it happens.'' The 175 page anthology contains short fiction, non-fiction, poetry and interviews by 50 female and male authors, depicting a range of experience, from subtle forms of violence (e.g. derisive jokes, graffiti, and attitudes by doctors) to sexual assault by family members, teachers, neighbours, or strangers.
Out the other side
When I recently received my contributor's copy of the book and read the work of the other 49 writers, I could see how each piece, each voice -- whether lyrical or blunt, emerging or established -- added another layer or facet to an overall picture. Whether I was reading Kelly Pitman's story of being molested as a child by an elderly neighbour, or Susan Musgrave's sequence of poems, 'Heroines' (drawn from the stories of six women who were addicted to heroin and who worked as sex workers in Downtown Eastside), Sara Graefe's story of a student's sexual abuse by a popular teacher, or Susan Braley's wide-ranging poem about the treatment of women around the world, I felt grateful that other writers were able to communicate the multi-dimensionality and gravity of the subject matter so vividly and honestly to readers. And I also felt relief to read pieces by Journey prize-winner Yasuko Thanh, and veteran writers Madeline Sonik and Janet Marie Rogers that depict the experiences and perspectives of those who have passed through the tunnel of abuse and violence to come out the other side. I'm not sure that our 50 droplets of water can put out the forest fire -- but it's a start.
Today, Dec. 6, is the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women, marking the anniversary of the 14 women murdered at Montreal's École Polytechnique in 1989. To commemorate the day, the Vancouver launch of the anthology will be held this evening, Monday, Dec. 6 at 7:30 p.m. at Joy Kogawa House, 1450 West 64th Avenue in Vancouver (details here). Additional readings from the anthology are scheduled at the Vancouver Public Library at 350 West Georgia Street on Thursday, Jan. 13, 2011 from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., and at the Carnegie Centre in February 2011 (date TBA).
Royalties from the sale of the book will go to the BC Society of Transition Houses. Caitlin Press has recently partnered with the We Can BC Coalition, which works to combat violence against women, to distribute Walk Myself Home in the province as a resource in education and activism. ![]()



16
Login or register to post comments
sludge
1 year ago
Intervention is required at the source.
I would like to remind you that women are the majority of perpetrators of child abuse, not men. While I do sympathize with women who are the victims of abuse, let's put this is perspective. The rate of inter-partner abuse within relationships is greatest amongst lesbian couples. The vast majority of men never lift a finger to women. Studies have shown that women account for 50% of all domestic violence amongst male-female relationships. The difference is, men tend to finish the job. Women will kick, hit and punch a man; men will strangle a woman. This is the difference. The main thing to understand is, domestic violence is part of what is known as an abusive relationship. We, as a society, need to understand why it is that women will form abusive relationships with their partners.
KWD
1 year ago
sludge
BULLSHIT!!!
Perhaps you can provide some references for this load of crap.
paisley
1 year ago
Yes there is a load of crap.
If one was to check the latest stats concerning violence they can check Statscan which shows a decline in violence against women over the last 20 yrs.
Further research is showing that much of this spousal violence is taking place among newer immigrant populations. Of course these studies are taking place south of the border because heaven forbid us Canadians don't do ethnic profiling.
There was a study done by the Mulroney government in Alberta following the Marc Lupine's murders. Costing 5 million, the study was kept secret and agents for the government only released parts of the study concerning violence against women. A few fellows were able to finally get access more than 10 yrs after and found that the study indicated that women were more likely to act violently(strike the first blow) against their spouse. The government has never released the full report for obvious reasons, the data collected was not in the interest of woman's groups.
While women claim that they are less violent than men I will use KWD's first word. Oh and just one more little fact, women are 7 times more likely to kill their own children than men.
On this white ribbon day we men are expected to hang our head low and be embarrassed that we are in fact men because we all know that us men are the only perpetrators of violence in our western society or at least the feminist fear media spin is telling us that. My head is not hung low and for good reason, I'm not buying it.
John Greg
1 year ago
Too Much Misinformation
Yes, we should all indeed be concerned about violence against women. However, perhaps we would better serve ourselves and society at large if we became more informed, activist, and constructive about violence in general: Men against women; women against men, men against men; women against women; adults against children; children against their senior parents, and so on and so forth.
And it really must be pointed out that the article above by Fiona Lam is overflowing with misinformation and inaccuracies, and is terribly incendiary, devoid of evidence to back its many extremist claims, and serves no one very well in trying to come to terms with social violence, whether it be men against women, women against men, etc.
Lam's article is an example of moral panic writ large. I would urge folks to do some serious research into the dangers of moral panics. Moral panics are very destructive to society in general and absolutely fatal to presenting and maintaining a constructive, meaningful, objective, balanced, and thoughtful process for fixing major social problems.
And the first thing a moral panic article like the above does is to utterly stifle meaningful dialogue, discussion, and debate.
I'll give you a starter link: http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/archives/vol03n03.html
Moral panics generally lead to such perfect acts of vigilantism as that in Britain when a bunch of folks beat up a pediatrician because they were too stupid and too fired up by articles like Lam's to remember the difference between pediatrician and pedophile.
VivianLea Doubt
1 year ago
"the rising of the women...
means the rising of us all'...says the song Bread and Roses. Expecting men to hang their heads in embarassment because they are men? Say it isn't so, for I love men... Embarassment at inarticulate discourse, maybe.
The United Nations has conveniently released a report on issues facing women around the world, and here is what the report has to say about violence against women:
Violence against women is a universal phenomenon.
• Women are subjected to different forms of violence – physical, sexual, psychological and economic – both within and outside their homes.
• Rates of women experiencing physical violence at least once in their lifetime vary from several per cent to over 59 per cent depending on where they live.
• Current statistical measurements of violence against women provide a limited source of information, and statistical definitions and classifications require more work and harmonization at the international level.
• Female genital mutilation – the most harmful mass perpetuation of violence against women – shows a slight decline.
I am sure anyone that is interested can find a wealth of statistics therein, but we here hardly need them. We can see the anger that is generated merely by writing about violence against women.
KWD
1 year ago
more statistics
One in three women suffer trauma from spousal abuse. Women constitute more than 85% of those suffering from domestic abuse. More than 30% of all women killed are killed by their partner. Only 3% of murdered men are men killed by their partner.
The fact that Stats Can reports declines in violence against women in the last 20 years is interesting. Some of that decline is the result of fewer women reporting abuse out of fear of even worse reprisal, but most is a result of the institution of dual arrest policies. Police, when called to domestic disputes, and being confronted with conflicting stories, are arresting both parties. Abusive men, and antifeminist conservatives, have found the dual arrest policy to be a great support for their claims of gender symmetry.
When involved in abuse that may lead to potentially serious legal issues, and worried that the police might soon be knocking on the door, men have resorted to self-inflicted injury and being the first to call police. Which further distorts reality by creating stats that show more women, than in the past, are showing up on the “abusive” list.
paisley claims,“the study indicated that women were more likely to act violently(strike the first blow) against their spouse.” This is typical of most arguments that try to bait and switch. The studies are pretty clear; researchers don’t deny some women are, or can be, abusive. But when you dig deeper into the details and start examining things like context, meaning and motive … and find that the women that struck the first blow has been repeatedly physically, psychologically and sexually abused by her partner over the duration of the relationship… striking the first blow is meaningless. Not only that, there’s a world of difference between a slap, punch, scatch or knee to the groin men might receive, and the broken jaw or “marital rape” inflicted on the woman.
sludge
1 year ago
Women commit child abuse more than men.
KWD says: "One in three women suffer trauma from spousal abuse."
hahahahaha!!!! Give me a break, lady. Do you seriously expect me to believe that? At least have the decency to provide a source.
"Women constitute more than 85% of those suffering from domestic abuse."
Define suffering, and provide a source.
"More than 30% of all women killed are killed by their partner."
Source?
"Only 3% of murdered men are men killed by their partner."
Source?
Here is a statistic for you. Enjoy: "Approximately 58 percent (57.9%) of perpetrators (of child abuse) were women and 42 percent (42.1%) of perpetrators were men."
Source:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm06/chapter5.htm
VivianLea Doubt
1 year ago
hmmmm...anger?
Women are 10 times more likely than men to be the primary caregiver for children - yes, 10 times. Therefore, one would expect child abuse by women to be 10 times greater than that of men, but it isn't so.
The real issue here is why some men feel compelled to deny the reality of violence towards women - after all, no one denies the reality of female violence. What is it that gets y'all so hot and bothered?
bisquy
1 year ago
what am I reading?
I don't know where you get your facts, but I think that anyone who is not lying to themselves is aware of the basic facts of who does the violence and to whom. Are there 30 or more missing men killed by serial killers in various cities in Canada, or is it missing women? Do women pimp men out on the streets? Do women make as much money at the same jobs? Men have the economic power and the physical power and the tendency to violence. There is no point arguing reality with people clearly not interested in admitting it. This is just more ranting by men who want to power trip on women to keep them shut up, and it makes me sick that it happens in Canada in this day and age; but that said, it is clear that this day and age is ruled by Harper and the types that cater to power. Bullying is their way and that attitude is permeating our society. In daily life women had better learn to keep their mouths shut, otherwise they will be beaten in one way or another--losing a job, losing their children and assets in divorce, or being physically threatened. It is very real and this country is a hotbed of mysoginy. Anyone who thinks otherwise is perpetrating falsehoods for reasons of power and control.
bisquy
1 year ago
how it is done
Why bother wasting time arguing about reality with someone who gets a kick out of insulting women? Better to get to work on the efforts to seek justice than to waste another minute on people who are full of hate. It's not about that. It's about getting fair labour laws for everyone so that all single parents can afford to look after their kids; it's about changing the court system so that divorce is worked out in a more fair manner that works more for the kids than the lawyers' wallets; it's about putting a stop to unrestricted corporate greed and making laws to protect people, not profits. We need to work together to make it a better world, not arguing about who did what to whom. If anyone in a lousy relationship could easily walk out and find decent childcare and a job, they would likely do so and that would end a lot of the problems. It's when they have nowhere else to go that problems turn horrible and ugly. We need childcare. We need jobs that pay enough to raise kids. We don't need arguing.
sludge
1 year ago
Yawn. violence shmiolence.
Here are the statistics, which can be easily viewed from google. This latest is from Stats Canada, 2006:
http://www42.statcan.ca/smr08/2006/smr08_012_2006-eng.htm
Note that 62 was the number of female victims of spousal homicide in 2004.
62. WOW. WHAT. A. PROBLEM.
Also note that 13 was the number of women killed by a current or former boyfriend in 2004.
OH. MY. GAWD. 13! Everyone please stop what you are doing now because obviously THE SKY IS FALLING!!!
Perspective, ladies.
Perspective.
THIS CROSSES THE LINE INTO OFFENSIVE, AND SEXIST, SARCASM ABOUT LIFE AND DEATH ISSUES FOR MANY OF OUR READERS. YOU ARE NO LONGER WELCOME ON THE TYEE'S COMMENT THREADS -- TYEE MODERATOR
KWD
1 year ago
VLD
What is it that gets them so hot and bothered? It’s actually quite simple: The fear of losing power and control.
There was a brief period when women were making great strides in terms of equal treatment, pay equity, suffrage and the right to own property. But it soon became apparent to many men that they stood to lose, and they weren’t having any part of a profeminist world that allowed women greater freedom. After all, the machinery in our patriarchal history has worked tirelessly to instill men with the belief that they are entitled to power and control. And if you lose power and control you become …. Heaven forbid, a woman.
Pickton, Lepine and Williams are the visible symptoms of attitudes and policies towards women that have become systemic: hidden and institutionalized.
The real problem in ending violence against women goes beyond recognizing violent actions of perpetrators. It requires exposing attitudes and policy.
Drake
1 year ago
50 drops
As a male I find the comments more unsettling than original article. Those attacking the suggestion that women live in an environment of threatened or actual violence are living in an alternative and imaginary universe. The vast majority of males dont worry about taking a walk at night or to walk to their car in a parking lot in the dark. Women do - both because of the actual risk and equally due to the articles that cover violence toward women. I would suggest anyone who doesnt believe this imbalance exists speak to police - professionals who deal with the real world on an ongoing basis
paisley
1 year ago
@VivianLea
Women are 10 times more likely than men to be the primary caregiver for children - yes, 10 times.”
Since you brought it up, that women are 10 timesing us men in the child nurturing department why I ask, are you women nurturing such violent individuals and it appears you have been doing it for some time? What on earth could you women be doing or not doing so disastrously as to influence such behavior? Perhaps it is a quality issue? To much housework cutting into “Quality Time”, I suppose.
Considering that over 80% of all wealth spent in our western society passes through the hands of women( if that isn’t power and influence I don’t know what is) and that there are more female voters than male(again if that isn’t power) and your fact that women spend far more time raising our children yet still men are brow beaten to embrace feminism because….why? Because men should help more to make our kids get big and fat too. Help teach our children to embrace the “keep up with the Jones’s” mentality.
You have to wonder no longer Vivian why men get upset about Dec. 6. This day, we as men are to feel ashamed that we are men because our society as a whole failed to prevent a newly immigrated obviously disturbed man raised in a home that embraced a religious doctrine that classifies women as “less than a man” of which, more so than not, also, within the bounds of a society that embraces the religious “woman less than man” concept. Sorry, no thanks. I, as a man, am not taking any responsibility for the acts of violence against women in our society and I ask, how can the feminists actually qualify that men solely should? For every act of violence that is attached to a repeat offender there exists an enabler(s). It is easy to understand who these enablers are.
What I have mentioned here is just the tip of the iceberg of why men are so sick and tired of taking all the blame for the ills of our society when it is so obvious that men are truly not running the show in our western society yet are expected to take the blame for it.
ds007
1 year ago
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/fv-vf/facts-info/sa-vc.html
According to the GSS, women and men experience similar rates of both violence and emotional abuse in their relationships. The survey found, however, that the violence experienced by women is tended to be more severe - and more often repeated - than the violence directed at men. For example, compared to men, women were:
•six times more likely to report being sexually assaulted
•five times more likely to report being choked
•five times more likely to require medical attention, as a result of an assault
•three times more likely to be physically injured by an assault
•more than twice as likely to report being beaten
•almost twice as likely to report being threatened with, or having a gun or knife used against them
•much more likely to fear for their lives, or be afraid for their children as a result of the violence
•more likely to have sleeping problems, suffer depression or anxiety attacks, or have lowered self-esteem as a result of being abused, and
•more likely to report repeated victimization.
Some researchers have noted that the survey also found that women experience higher levels of certain types of emotional abuse. Compared to men, women:
•were four times more likely to report being threatened, harmed, or having someone close to them threatened or harmed
•were four times more likely to report being denied access to family income
•were more than twice as likely to report having their property damaged or their possessions destroyed
•reported a higher incidence of being isolated from family and friends, and
•reported a higher rate of name-calling and put downs.
Homicide data reveals that women are also at higher risk of being killed by their husbands. In the past two decades, three times as many wives were killed by their husbands, as husbands killed by wives.10 The rate of spousal homicide is much higher for Aboriginal women and men.
No national data on the prevalence of spousal abuse in same-sex relationships is available, however, there is a growing body of research that indicates that spousal abuse is a serious problem among both lesbian and gay couples.
VivianLea Doubt
1 year ago
responsibility?
Well, just because you asked, paisley, women apparently are 12 times as likely to be doing the housework. So: the majority of women work (old figures were 74% of women in Canada), and they also are the primary caregivers for children, and they are also doing the housework. Sounds like a recipe for breakdown to me.
What I don't get is why you would infer from this article, or from my posts, that men should be blamed for the problems of this society.The problems are societal and we are all responsible. (Well, we can except the children.) The first step in solving any issue or problem is in getting it out in the open - public discourse, and some exchange of views. Both you and sludge seem to want to minimize or deny the problem - why? Acknowledging that the problem of violence towards women exists does not preclude acknowledging that there are many other societal problems...
When I read or hear of women who perpetuate violence, I don't hang my head in shame at being at woman. I do reflect very deeply though, on the kinds of structures and supports and equalities we should put into place in order to prevent these tragedies - for both men and women. In case you haven't heard, feminism is about the equality of women...now just think on that for a moment...equality of men and women. Equal means equal, not lesser than or greater than. It's a fine and noble concept.