Books

'Crossings' Rewrites Slave History

Simon Schama's book puts slavery at the centre of the War of Independence, with echoes across Canada.

By Crawford Kilian, 15 Aug 2006, TheTyee.ca

Rough Crossings

  • Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves, and the American Revolution
  • Simon Schama
  • Viking (2004)

It's a shock to read a history that revises what had seemed carved in stone. The shock is doubled when the history throws new light on one's own book.

Simon Schama gave me such a shock in Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves, and the American Revolution. He forces us to look again at Canada's origins as well as the birth of the U.S.A. Even B.C.'s early history looks different in the light of Rough Crossings.

The winners write history, but this is an account of the losers: Britain and its loyalist supporters in the American Revolution. Schama makes us realize that the revolution was really the first American civil war. And like the second one, slavery (not tea taxes) was the critical issue.

The rebels who declared independence fought their loyalist neighbours as much as they fought British redcoats and mercenary Hessians. And without the wealth produced by black slaves, the white rebels would have lacked the resources to sustain a war.

The British understood the hypocrisy of liberty-loving patriots who enslaved their fellow men, and the patriots themselves were extremely thin-skinned and defensive about it. Schama quotes Patrick Henry, but it's not "Give me liberty or give me death." Henry understood how compromised he was as the owner of slaves. His only excuse: "I am drawn along by the general inconveniency of living without them."

The first emancipation

Slavery had been an issue in Britain also, and in 1772 a King's Court decision reverberated from London to the American colonies and eventually around the world to colonial Victoria, B.C. It is reverberating still.

James Somerset, a slave owned by Charles Stewart since 1749, had travelled with his master from the American colonies to London in 1769. Late in 1771, fearing he would be sold and shipped to the Caribbean, Somerset vanished -- but was soon found and kidnapped by professional slave-catchers.

This was routine in 1770s London, but in this case a witness secured a writ of habeas corpus. A test of slavery's legality in Britain followed, and the decision by Lord Chief Justice Mansfield established a radical principle: by simply setting foot on British soil, a slave became free.

When war broke out in the American colonies a few years later, the principle was applied in whatever territory the British controlled -- not to uphold the law, but to weaken the rebels economically. British authorities made it known that slaves who escaped their masters and came through the British lines would be automatically liberated. (This did not apply, however, to slaves belonging to loyalists.)

Ex-slaves could work for British pay as carpenters, cooks, laundresses and soldiers. And they did. The loss of slaves seriously compromised the rebel war effort. Even some of Washington's slaves defected. Meanwhile, black soldiers fought effectively for Britain in both set-piece battles and guerrilla campaigns.

The British actually suffered from the success of their policy -- so many blacks swarmed in that not enough work or shelter was available for them. Thousands died of smallpox and other diseases.

When the tide turned against the British, they had to remove not only their own troops but white and black loyalists. Many in both groups chose to move to Nova Scotia, where they were promised both land and tools.

Betrayal followed at once. Some blacks were left behind and re-enslaved. Those who migrated to Nova Scotia (and then to New Brunswick) received little or no land, and were soon forced to indenture themselves to white loyalists -- in effect, a new kind of slavery.

Another promised land

The anti-slavery movement in Britain was growing in force in the 1780s, and its leaders were aware of the plight of the Nova Scotian blacks. As a way of redeeming British promises, and also striking at the source of the slave trade, anti-slavery leaders developed a plan to settle the Nova Scotians in Sierra Leone. A democratic, productive community there could turn the whole continent away from slavery to the blessings of honest trade.

John Clarkson, a British naval lieutenant, was appointed to lead this new migration, and he succeeded brilliantly. He canvassed the black Nova Scotians, signed up hundreds, and commissioned a fleet of 15 ships to transport over a thousand migrants to Africa. It was an epic journey forgotten in North American history.

Once there, Clarkson and his people struggled against climate, disease and nearby slave-trading depots, but they established a thriving community complete with school and hospital. They elected a local government under Clarkson, and even some women had the right to vote.

But when Clarkson returned to Britain, life turned sour: other whites ran the settlement like a typical colony, treating the blacks with contempt. The Nova Scotians revolted, and were put down -- ironically, by a body of Maroons, Jamaican ex-slaves who were being resettled in Sierra Leone.

Echoes in British Columbia

I had known essentially none of this before reading Schama's book. I had a vague awareness that blacks had been among the resettled loyalists, and that Sierra Leone had been founded to repatriate ex-slaves.

I did know of the Somerset case, however, because it played a key role in the gold-rush history of British Columbia. While researching my book Go Do Some Great Thing: The Black Pioneers of British Columbia, I learned that in 1860 a young black slave, Charles Mitchell, had stowed away on an American ship from Olympia, Washington territory, to Vancouver Island. Discovered, he had been locked up on the ship when it docked in Victoria. The captain planned to restore him to his owner on the ship's return.

Victoria's black community, recent émigrés from San Francisco, soon learned about this, and they too secured a writ of habeas corpus. The boy was removed from the ship and brought before a judge -- who invoked the Somerset case and ordered him freed.

Like the black loyalists, B.C.'s blacks were seeking a better land, following the promises of B.C. governor Sir James Douglas (himself part black). And the blacks of the gold-rush era also saw the promises eventually broken. Most returned to the U.S. after the Civil War, hoping that America would be better. That would be yet another disappointment.

The wealth of the British Empire in America was founded on slavery, and the revolution was just a quarrel about dividing the profits. But some Britons and Americans saw the injustice that created that wealth. They launched the first real campaign of social engineering. Within a few decades they had abolished slavery in the British Isles. They also created such a conflict in the U.S. that (at a terrible cost) Americans eventually abolished slavery there as well.

Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation was essentially a repeat of the British political tactic four score and seven years before. While it was a flawed document, and led to yet more broken promises, it helped prepare the way for future generations to achieve something closer to the vision of John Clarkson -- a society of equal blacks and whites, working in harmony. We have more rough crossings to make, but we are getting there.

Crawford Kilian is a frequent contributor to The Tyee.  [Tyee]

12  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • jimtan

    5 years ago

    Comments on "'Crossings' Rewrites Slave History"

    Good writeup. Thanks to Kiian for the information.

  • Truman Green

    5 years ago

    Wonderful of you to review this revision, Crawford. But I must say none of it comes as revelation to me. I realized this many years ago at UBC, while majoring in American history, and going through all those primary sources regarding the marketing of human beings as products. A healthy, strong male slave was worth about 1200 bucks, which was a small fortune. Of course the pre-revolution American economy was built around black slavery. Why this is not well-known is a complete mystery. (Couldn't possibly be due to all the white liars who wrote the history of the land of the free and the home of the brave could it?)

    Who the hell did all the work before the American revolution? And who built the economy to the degree that it was capable of supporting a rebellion against the world's foremost superpower, if it wasn't black slaves?

    There's another nasty little secret about the American civil war. One of the major inducements to rebellion against the north was the white slave master's (and indeed any white man's) enragement at having to give up the right to molest and rape any black woman or young girl or child who caught his attention.

    Again, good on you for doing this review, Crawford Killian!

  • anarcho

    5 years ago

    Thank you for this review. I hope lots of people read this book. One thing though, it just wasn't the American economy that developed on the back of the slaves, but the capitalist economy in general The three way trade established in the 17th Century - slaves from Africa - sugar from the Caribbean plantations and tobacco from Virgina traded to England for manufactured goods - all on the back of slaves. A truly fiendish system and something the apologists for the corporate system sure don't want to hear about.

  • IAMC

    5 years ago

    Modern corporations ( modern ) in Canada and the USA don't employ slave labour. It's not good business, Anarcho.
    I read an Eatons catalogue from 1905 recently. We must have employed slave like labourers in order to sell things at that price.
    I get tired of us being chastised for the sins of the past. We need to learn from history, true.
    And we have. Corporations don't use slave labour anymore.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    IAMC/Ron Erwin:
    We just don't call it slave labour. Do a little reading about the working conditions and wages and the sin of child labour in the third world and remember those cheap prices at Walmart.

    I know you couldn't care less for those people who make your standard of living possible - but it is still a sad fact that our prosperity is built on the backs of others.
    In fact, you are the biggest slave yourself because you are chained by your own ignorance.

    Now go see if you can find an Ann Coulter line to insult third world workers Ron; or something from that pathetic creep Sean Hannity. He's one of your heroes too, isn't he?

  • Bailey

    5 years ago

    Dear IAMC; Your statement that modern corporations (modern) don't use slaves is factually untrue. They do. And the use of these slaves continues.

    The only thing is they have developed a loophole. They pay the slaves. Not much, just enough to be able to prove they do. A buck or two a day, on paper.

    The trick is they don't actually give them the money. Instead they debit the slave's 'account' with charges for room and board which are higher than the so-called wage. The slave's debt grows for each day of life.

    Understand, they are purchased outright; property. Bought and paid for. Bought and sold. They are imprisoned and guarded, with no right to quit or even leave. Abused at will. Despite the loophole these women, they are mostly Asian women, are true slaves.

    There are other smaller markets as well. Orphaned children in Africa. Refugees fleeing wars are sometimes trapped into indentures and so forth. Slavery is not so agricultural as it was two hundred years ago. It's more industrial and commercial.

    But slavery is what it is.

    By the way, you do understand the nature of infaltion, don't you? The prices weren't lower in 1905, the money was just worth more. A lot more.

  • anarcho

    5 years ago

    Ron carefully ignores the content of my posting. I said that the ORIGIN of capitalism lies in large part in slavery. I never said that the corporations (today) employ chattel slaves. (WAges slaves, well, thats another matter) Ron wants to forget about the monstrous, nazi-like origins of his beloved system. Yeah, sweep it under the rug, but man, it leaves a big lump!

  • climber

    5 years ago

    I think Ed Deak had it best when he said our semi capitalist system was at its best in the 50s, when there were decent profits and wages. Since then it has spiraled out of control, with the corporations becoming psycopaths. Anyways, sounds like a very interesting book, more white guilt for us. As if we are not carrying enough already, that you choose to that is, I don't.

  • Truman Green

    5 years ago

    climber, you don't have to feel guilty. Most of the world's slaves are in Africa today--captured as kids to do mercenary killings, (by other Africans) or sold to rich people in far away towns as kitchen and field help--or in India--apparently 15 million of them-- chained up to commercial sewing machines or otherwise held in bondage, for disgusting work even harijans won't do. Virtually none of these slave masters are white, so not to worry!

    Actually there's more slaves in the world today than there were before the emancipation proclamation.

    Slavery's become an equal opportunity employer.

  • anarcho

    5 years ago

    Climber, I don't feel guilt at all for slavery. All my ancestors were peasants or workers. It was the ruling class that imposed slavery. And furthermore, long prior to enslving Black peopler they enslaved the Irish and the English poor. Black, white and brown, we face a common enemy for a common reason

  • Umslopogaas

    5 years ago

    Apple's I pods are made in China by people who work a minimum 60 hour work week for low low wages. Go figure

  • Tom Lal

    5 years ago

    Perhaps we should all look at the labels on the backs of the computers we all type on. Many I am sure were produced in countries and factories that employ near slave labour. My thought is simply that it is far sexier to attack clothing manufacturers and chain stores that sell garments and products that are easy to identify. It is a global problem that is an international disgrace. Slavery still exists in this world but as someone said earlier we pay slaves in paper only transactions but the workers are still often owned.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.