The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

2010 Olympics

BC Auditor General laps Liberals (for third time)

The BC Auditor General thinks the provincial government needs to break its addiction to budget fudge.

In a letter to the Speaker of the House, Auditor General John Doyle writes:

“My Office’s two previous reports, issued in 2003 and 2006, conclude that British Columbia's share of the full costs of the Games is considerably higher than the $600 million figure that has often been quoted.

“Further, in the absence of full disclosure by the Province, each report highlights significant risks that could result in even higher costs to the Province by the time the Games are finished.

“...fundamental differences of opinion between government and my Office remain unresolved. While the details of specific issues may have shifted to some extent since the Office’s last report -- cost estimates remain, to a great extent, a moving target -- the underlying fundamental differences of opinion between government and my Office have not.

“Specifically, I share my predecessors’ view that the full cost of staging the Games should include a number of items that are not included in the official budget. ... the risks associated with some costs and revenues have been adequately disclosed. Should these risks come to pass, the cost of staging the Games could escalate considerably.

“...I have but one recommendation -- that government expand its definition of Games-related costs to include all items that are reasonably attributable to hosting the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games, and report publicly on these costs and the risks associated with them.”

For finance minister Colin Hansen’s response, see this story in the Globe and Mail.

Filed in

3  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    What is there to hide?

    Hanson's claim that all the costs will benefit the economy of the Province and so it is O.K. might be true but then all the more reason to have full accountability and openess. Unless they have something to hide.

  • NicS

    3 years ago

    Privatization Can Hide Many Things

    When the NDP wins in May, we may well see where all the money went. Our tax dollars will likely be ending up in the pockets of all the privatized gov't service providers: - old age homes, private health clinics, road and bridge tolls all disguised by the Liberals to appear cheaper than the same services provided by gov't.

    Quote:
    " Privatizing government can backfire on taxpayers"
    From The Atlantic Journal-Constitution
    By Jay Bookman
    That way, politicians get to claim they're holding the line on taxes and private companies get lucrative contracts. The only people who lose are the public.
    And while tolls do have their place, in many cases the loss to the public is significant. In a survey of toll projects around the country, the Washington State Department of Transportation found that operators spend an average of 22 cents in overhead -- toll collectors, equipment, etc. -- just to collect a dollar in revenue. Raising revenue through the gas tax, by comparison, costs less than a penny on the dollar in overhead, according to data from the Federal Highway Administration.
    Privatization also creates a whole new means for politicians to trade contracts for campaign contributions and other favors, as the latest "pay to play" scandal in Illinois demonstrates. Among his many other alleged sins, Gov. Rod Blagojevich is on tape demanding that highway contractors deliver campaign contributions of at least $500,000 in return for his approval of a $1.8 billion private tollway project.

    As you can see, the implications of privatization are very far reaching. Essentially privatizing the tax system for the corporate sector to help themselves from. Corporatisim at its best.

  • quarry bay

    3 years ago

    There is only one group that benefits with 2010

    Here is the story

    http://www.straight.com/article-93176/developers-are-the-games-real-winners

    The auditor general is being kind

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod