Vision Vancouver, the party that in 2007 called for a ban on corporate and union donations to local political campaigns, is poised to back away from that position at a meeting scheduled for next week.
In a report to council released yesterday, an electoral reform sub-committee advised Vancouver City Council as follows:
"On the issue of union and corporate donations, the Committee believes that rather than banning them outright, as is the case at the federal level, that the Province should implement a donation limit. A strict ban on union and corporate donations could make it very difficult to run effective election campaigns in both highly populated areas as well as large rural municipalities."
The committee includes Coun. Suzanne Anton of the Non-Partisan Association, Coun. Ellen Woodsworth of the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE) and Coun. George Chow of the ruling Vision Vancouver party. The committee’s draft recommendations will form the basis for a submission to the Provincial Local Government Elections Task Force, which has asked for comments on these issues by April 15, 2010.
ThinkCity chair Neil Monckton called on Vision to honor its 2007 pledge.
“The Vision Vancouver councilors called for a total ban on corporate and union campaign donations in 2007,” Monckton told The Tyee. “We hope the Vision councilors will again call for a total ban, as they did when they were in opposition.”
The report to council also endorsed a shift from three- to four-year municipal election cycles, and recommended that the city ask the province for legislative authority to adopt an alternate voting process, such as proportional representation.
Among the other recommendations to be considered by council on March 23:
* Set limits on the annual amount of contributions that can be given by an individual or organization to an elector organization, campaign organizer, or an individual seeking elected office, similar to those at the federal level
* Limit the amount of money that may be spent annually by an elector organization, campaign organizer, or an individual seeking elected office during a general local election campaign, similar to those at the provincial and federal level
* Disallow contributions to an elector organization, campaign organizer, or an individual seeking elected office, from sources outside of Canada
* Require that all donations and expenses for candidates, elected officials and elector organizations be disclosed on a continuous basis at six month intervals
* Implement a system of tax credits for municipal donations, similar to those for provincial and federal elections
* Change the definition of “candidate” to include anyone seeking nomination within an elector organization for candidacy to a local government office
* Appoint the Provincial Chief Election Officer to oversee municipal elections in BC, and establish penalties and mechanisms for enforcement of offences under the amended local government elections legislation
* Oppose allowing corporations the right to vote in local elections
* Provide local governments with the authority to use any method of elections they wish to use, and repeal the requirement for Lieutenant Governor in Council approval to adopt such a change
* Amend the definition of election offenses and related penalties to include individuals acting as an intermediary in third-party campaign contribution schemes
The report to council also notes that six years later, only two of the 23 recommendations made by the Vancouver Electoral Reform Commission have been acted on by the province. That commission was headed by former Supreme Court judge Thomas Berger.
Monte Paulsen reports for The Tyee.


10
Login or register to post comments
G West
1 year ago
Don't back down
Ban them entirely.
Vision is sounding more and more like Preston Manning explaining why he was moving into Stornaway...or Gordon Campbell on why he and his band of merry members needed gilt-edged pensions...or
But you get the point - elect the buggers once and they forget what the actually 'said' they believed in....
Pathetic.
telus employee
1 year ago
Vision progressive?
More confirmation for the fools who thought Vision Vancouver was progressive, that they are not.
These are by coincidence the many of the same fools who thought that Obama was progressive.
.Luke.
1 year ago
Vision Vancouver Is Now on The Right Track...
http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/vision-vancouver-chooses-ed-with-liberal-connections-over-ndp/#comments
At least VV is now germinating into a civic version of the federal Liberal Party and turfing loony left-wing elements.
A good centrist party for Vancouver. What's not to like?!
G West
1 year ago
Shameless .Luke.
Why would anyone pay any attention to a poster who'd do what you've done .Luke.?
Until you apologize for your disgusting behavior towrd Rod Smelser you have no business coming here and posting under ANY alias.
Frank
1 year ago
dot Luke
Only in the land of make-believe is Campbell a centrist.
But keep strumming that banjo anyway, its entertaining if nothing else.
Name
1 year ago
Ban them!
Business and union donations just encourage the more extremist left/right fringes.
Most of us joined Vision to escape that and find a centrist party that put citizens first, while being respectful of other interests.
Sure an outright ban would dramatically change the landscape of electioneering - but it would do so by levelling the playing field and encouraging more direct citizen engagement. And maybe all those businesses and unions would invest some of their new surplus millions in doing some good in their own community instead. And they'd pay millions more in extra taxes without all those political tax credits.
How is any of that not a good thing?
C'mon VV - don't let us down! This would be very disappointing. Without principles you end up being no different than those whom you replaced.
Daytripper
1 year ago
Say Cheese
[COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]
Sask Resident
1 year ago
Stay in Power
Donations from the elites, like powerful unions and corporate boardrooms, allows high powered campaigns so the Vision can stay in power. Vision has become a smaller version of the federal Liberal party, fool the unions and take orders from the boardrooms.
Maybe Vancouver should include a term limit as mayor, like 6 years?
You know, power corrupts!
dianarobert23
1 year ago
Smaller vision
Really Vision has become a smaller version of the federal Liberal party, fool the unions and take orders from the boardrooms.
How to get pregnant
Diet Solution Program
Payday Loans
freebear
1 year ago
Political whiplash!
From 'changing' your pre-elected 'position to your once elected position!
Makes for sore political necks!
And rug burns from their corporate cronies!