The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

Media

Watching Gaza from space

The media aren’t being admitted into the Gaza Strip, but satellites are far above the battle...and taking pictures.

At Unosat, you can track the damage inflicted on Gaza between December 31 and January 6, and no doubt more updates will soon be available.

Here’s part of what Unosat said on January 9, re-paragraphed for easier reading:

This map presents a preliminary and on-going satellite-based damage assessment for affected areas within Gaza City. Damaged buildings, infrastructure and impact craters have been identified with WorldView-1 satellite imagery acquired on 6 January 2009, and received at a reduced spatial resolution of 2 meters.

Pre-crisis Ikonos satellite imagery from June 2005 was also used. Affected buildings were classified either as destroyed or severely damaged by standard image interpretation methods. Destroyed buildings have been defined by the total collapse of the structure or when it was standing but with less than 50% of the roof still intact.

Severely damaged buildings were defined as having visible structural damage to a portion of one wall, or where a section of the roof was damaged but with over 50% of the roof still intact.

Please note: Buildings not marked in the map as damaged does not imply the buildings are undamaged, only that damages were not identified with the available satellite imagery at the time of map publication. Because of the reduced spatial resolution of this satellite imagery, the confidence level for damage identification within dense urban areas is significantly reduced.

It is highly probable, therefore, that the damages currently identified in this map underestimate the actual building and infrastructure damages present on the ground at the time of satellite image acquisition.

As of January 10, the maps available on the site are PDFs dated 31 December 2008, 5 January 2009, and 6 January 2009. Both high- and low-resolution maps are downloadable.

Filed in

4  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • RickW

    3 years ago

  • zalm

    3 years ago

    Snicker - make me laugh RickW

    That's the best one yet! If there were a word of truth in it. As if the Israelis would have left the Gaza Strip 3 years ago if there were any oil and gas in the region.

    The tip off is "the country of Palestine". It isn't a country yet, so it can't have reserves. Unfortunately, it's still administered by the UN and occupied by Israel.

    Israel has a few of its own reserves, but they're north and west of Tel Aviv, more toward Lebanese waters, as well as some oil shale in the Negev.

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/East_Med/Oil.html

  • RickW

    3 years ago

  • zalm

    3 years ago

    Water is the issue

    As you say, then as now. I recall the issue coming to a head in one area when a friend serving with CPT in Hebron mentioned the issue in connection with a kibbutz (Giladi perhaps? Blum? I can't remember) which was accustomed to serving its Arab neighbours with water from its supply which was taken from a local source with its headwaters outside the kibbutz property. The army claimed the land with the headwaters for "strategic purposes", and then forbade the kibbutz to sell their water to the Arab village.

    With the construction of the settle bypass roads, the Arabs had no way of getting water except by tanker truck from another Arab city further to the south - Nazareth-way - at the expense of a day's travel each way.....when the checkpoints were open.

    Huh. Justice for all...

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod