The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

Labour + Industry

Black Liquor: Canada counters US loophole with enviro grants

VANCOUVER - The federal government today announced a funding program worth up to $1 billion for some pulp and paper producers who have been squeezed by government funding to their American competitors. But the money comes with green strings attached.

The program applies to mills that produce a chemical by-product called “black liquor” which is then used as a fuel by the mill. If legislation is passed this fall, these companies will be eligible for $0.16 for every litre of black liquor burned this year, provided they invest the money into environmental upgrades to the mills over the next three years.

Similar mills in the United States have been receiving federal government funding ever since realizing last year they were technically eligible for a tax program that was designed to subsidize biofuels for road vehicles.

By mixing small amounts of diesel fuel into the black liquor so it can be classified as a blended “alternative” fuel, the liquid qualified for a $0.50US per gallon tax rebate (approx. $0.15CDN per litre). The scheme has resulted in tens of millions of dollars being paid to US pulp producers each month, and the re-opening of some closed American mills.

The tax loophole has been criticized in the U.S. as a drain on public coffers, and in other countries as an unfair subsidy to a struggling industry.

Canadian Trade Minister Stockwell Day, in a teleconference this afternoon, refused to explicitly confirm that the Canadian program was in response to the American situation.

“What I'll say is, we always monitor those types of things, and I'll leave it to others to draw their own conclusions,” he said.

The official announcement of the Canadian program, by Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt, focused on the environmental aspects of the program. The title of the initiative is “The Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program.”

Nonetheless, Day acknowledged the money “would help to level the playing field” for Canadian companies who are currently at a competitive disadvantage.

Day also said that the Canadian program was designed to end this December 31 because American officials have indicated that Congress will amend their tax laws to cut off funding for black liquor by that date. If the American tax scheme ends sooner, he expects the Canadian government “would look at reciprocating that.”

But opposition Parliamentarians questioned whether struggling Canadian pulp producers will be able to make the upgrades required to qualify for the money.

“If you're a pulp and paper company and you're losing millions of dollars each month, are you going to make an investment in a condenser, or a hog-fuel boiler, or some kind of environmental measure to make it easier to heat and light your plant?” asked NDP Forestry critic John Rafferty (Thunder Bay-Rainy River) in an interview with The Tyee.

There is also no funding for other types of mills who wish to upgrade their facilities (including pulp mills which use a mechanical process instead of chemical), and there is no funding for mills which have already shut down and are therefore not currently burning black liquor.

Day could only say that a “significant number” of mills were expected to take advantage of the program, based on departmental discussions with forestry associations.

Rafferty described the plan as an environmental solution to an economic problem. Although he supports funding for environmental upgrades, he wants the government to match the U.S. subsidy until that subsidy is removed.

“Because the money that the U.S. pulp and paper companies get is direct cash ... [they] will still be able to undercut Canadian companies by about 50 percent,” he argued.

The environmental focus of the program likely has as much to do with trade law as political spin. Day emphasized that government had thoroughly reviewed all trade impacts of the plan, saying they “don't want to go back to the days of excessive duties and countervails ... of constant and ongoing court cases” caused by the softwood lumber dispute.

Amelia Bellamy-Royds reports for The Tyee.

3  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • alive

    2 years ago

    Loophole?

    There is a little clause here that qualifies "power generation"!

    Bet some companies will tap that scource and not worry about getting the mill up and running.

    Alcan set the example of concentrating on producing power and to heck with their aluminum smelter.

    As always the devil is in the details!

  • Rod Smelser

    2 years ago

    Pulp Industry Investments

    Generally speaking there has been little or no investment in new capital in the BC section of the pulp and paper industry for over 15 years. I believe that last major investment in new capacity was the Celgar Pulp Company's $700M mill expansion carried out between 1991 and 1993. There have been routine improvements, and there were major investments in additional pollution abatement equipment mandated by the NDP government. But new or additional productive capacity has not been added in years.

    The "explanation" I get from "professionals" in the industry is that Canadian wages are too high, the unions are too powerful (unlike such hard working multi-million-dollar-a-year men as Jim Sheppard and Dunc Davies), and the South American forests grow more quickly. Needless to say, this is hardly a satisfactory explanation, and doesn't explain the dumbing down of the industry, such as closing the old M&B research labs in true Chainsaw Al fashion.

  • happy

    2 years ago

    Rod

    Port Mellon upgrade and expansion 1991-1993. 1.3 Billion

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod