The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

Environment

Oil sands firms 'underestimating' bird deaths, study says

Industry is vastly underreporting the amount of birds dying because of oil sands operations each year, a new study concludes.

“The self-reported data were internally inconsistent,” reads a report published Tuesday in the Wilson Journal of Ornithology, “and appeared to underestimate actual mortality.”

Energy from the oil sands is difficult to extract. Many operations literally claw bitumen – a viscous substance that needs a lot of upgrading – from the ground.

Waste is collected in massive tailings ponds equivalent to 170 square kilometres. Flocks of migratory birds sometimes land – and die – in these ponds.

Syncrude was recently found guilty for the deaths of 1,600 birds, an incident which gained worldwide attention in 2008.

Birds are dying all the time though, Tuesday's study found, and no credible monitoring system exists to track it.

On average, industry reported 65 bird deaths a year from 2000-2007, the authors calculated. Actual scientific numbers indicated 458 to 5,029 died annually. And even this “represents an unknown fraction of true mortality,” the report reads.

“Government-overseen monitoring within a statistically valid design, standardized across all facilities, is needed,” it said.

Oil sands companies and government officials often clash with the scientific community over environmental impact estimates.

Last week, a report concluded bitumen extraction is releasing cancer-causing heavy metals into the Athabasca River. The Alberta government continues to deny the accuracy of such findings.

One of the authors of the bird mortality report, Kevin Timoney, gained national attention this June. A government scientist apologized for calling Timoney’s previous oil sands research “lies”.

“You did not lie. You did not choose to remove data from your study,” read a letter signed by Dr. Preston McEachern.

The wind-turbine industry also struggles with bird deaths. Between 7,500 and 9,300 die each year at California’s Altamont Pass, one of the United State’s first major renewable energy facilities.

Geoff Dembicki reports for the Tyee.

2  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • morechatter

    1 year ago

    Tarred and feathers instead

    Why walk when you can fly right into a glass building? Birds die in cities as well but it isn't just are fine feathered friends that are meeting their Waterloo but the contaminants in the ground affect all that drink from the ponds and ends up in the ground as the toxins are passed along to the drinking water instead. Do the birds die instantly or is it a long painful death?

  • Sask Resident

    1 year ago

    We're surprised because ...?

    Since bird deaths are so difficult to determine, of course the estimates are lower than reality. The Wind Industry also cuts bird deaths by at least half. But avian cholera and habitat loss are still, by far, the biggest threats to migratory birds. Urbanization and highways destroy or alter most habitats but the effects are ignored. The oil sands is a minor issue in loss of migratory birds but get lots of press coverage.

    I have always had difficulty in taking Kevin Timoney's work seriously. He should focus more on his data and analysis and less on trying to get headlines. Details matter.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Off the Throne

    About The Hook

    The British Columbia legislature resumes sitting this week, but not before Premier Christy Clark outlined her spring agenda in an appearance on the Vancouver radio station where she used to work in what was pitched as a replacement for the throne speech. That agenda amounted to staying the course: focus on the economy, no money for teachers or anything else, and no higher taxes.

    This from a premier who won the leadership of her party on a "change" platform. Perhaps appropriate then that the government didn't bother with a more formal speech from the throne at a time when polls suggest an increasing number of people are wondering if the premier's going to, as they say, piss or get off the pot.

    -- Andrew MacLeod