The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

BC Politics

No assistance for victims of 'predictable' landslides in BC

Under the province's Disaster Financial Assistance program, home-owners can apply to receive compensation for as much as $300,000 in property damage caused by a disaster, but homes hit by landslides are not covered.

"The criteria is for sudden and unexpected events," said Wes Shoemaker, an Associate Deputy Minister in the province's Emergency Management BC division. "That's what disasters are really about."

Potential landslides can be often be predicted by tell-tale signs such as cracks in building foundations or sagging driveways, he told a Union of B.C. Municipalities forum in Penticton this morning.

Though landslides are predictable, he said, it can be very difficult to determine who is responsible. He added that it is hard to hold developers and local politicians accountable for decisions that were often made 25 to 30 years ago.

"The fact is, unfortunately that the homeowners are caught in the middle."

Peter Mitchell, a director with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC, said his group developed guidelines in 2006 that may help prevent landslides.

Many B.C. municipalities are already following the recommendations when they decide whether to build in areas with a landslide risk, he said.

"It's raised the bar," Mitchell said.

But the province has not yet identified a benchmark for landslide safety or acceptable risk that would help show the public how dangerous it is to live in certain areas, he added.

Nonetheless, Shoemaker said it is possible to mitigate the risk of landslides through proper risk assessments. "I think that we can have a better appreciation for what the risks are and we can manage them appropriately."

Geoff Dembicki is a staff reporter for The Hook.

1  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • NRF

    3 years ago

    Slide liability

    Don't burden me with responsibility for damage done after someone else makes changes on other properties and puts mine at risk.

    For example, Capilano College, City of North Vancouver and Metro Vancouver made changes at the top of the unstable Seymour River (west) escarpment. Minor slides have resulted, perhaps a major slide is possible.

    Will you hold accountable the innocent landowners downstream or the careless public officials who created the risk but claim immunity because they regulate the lands?

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod