Bah

(b) an act or omission, in or outside Canada,

(i) that is committed
(A) in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause, and
(B) in whole or in part with the intention of intimidating the public, or a segment of the public, with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act, whether the public or the person, government or organization is inside or outside Canada, and

(ii) that intentionally
(A) [...bodily harm]
(B) [...endangers]
(C) [...health or safety of the public]
(D) causes substantial property damage, whether to public or private property, if causing such damage is likely to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of clauses (A) to (C), or
(E) causes serious interference with or serious disruption of an essential service, facility or system, whether public or private, other than as a result of advocacy, protest, dissent or stoppage of work that is not intended to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of clauses (A) to (C),

So, all other forms of protest except impotent ones are now proscribed, and have been for five years. Government is entitled to suppress advocacy with fences, police, courts and taxation witchhunts, to suppress protest with court orders, or limitations on assembly in the location of your choice, to suppress dissent with direct media access to spread misinformation or propaganda, and to make illegal stoppage of work any time they want.

No other forms of dissent, protest or societal change are permitted - it says so there in Part ii. If there is anybody - ANYBODY - who thinks this is a good idea, well happy goldfish bowl to you. Just keep your nose to the TV and don't look out the window.

I sincerely doubt there's someone alive who doesn't do something wrong, against a bylaw or against the law every day. Everyone has something to hide, and everyone should, even if it's only your ID. It simply doesn't seem to have sunk in for many people that the government can "Maherize" you at any time simply for holding your opinions strongly.

So what's new?

This sounds like the treatment all Canadians who opposed the Liberals faced for the last 30 years, except it was done without any of the other liberals saying anything, until the Conservatives reaffirmed it in writing.
How else do you explain the fear that broadcasters have feared from being singled out by the CRTC for presenting a radio talk show host, who might actually have a political viewpoint, and advancing it.
I cannot take the complaining from people who have supported this policy, when it's convenient to them to suppress free speech.
I already feel violated by liberal thought police that have the backing of regulatory agencies that are unelected, untouchable and always funded by my income tax.
I am looking for freedom for the average guy before I worry about the rights of possible terrorists.
In other words, let freedom of speech happen, and all these problems will go away.