- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joel Berger is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Heather Sapergia is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dittmar Mundel is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Hardev Bal is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Sims is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
'Hereafter'
There's a special place in hell for 'serious' Hollywood films like this.
Good grief: Bryce Dallas Howard and Matt Damon.
Ever since my mom died, Dad talks a lot about Heaven. When the time comes, he hopes to see my mother there. I hope so too, of course. I don't believe it. But I can always hope. And at least I know that there is a place where Heaven is real. I've seen it many times, in the movies. Because in the magical world of the movies, you can sell any load of bullshit you want.
The latest pile arrives today in the form of director Clint Eastwood's new movie, Hereafter. The tale of a reluctant psychic (Matt Damon) and a French television host (Cecile de France) would like to pose as an exploration of loss and the quest for the divine. But Hereafter hardly qualifies as thought-provoking. Comforting bullshit is pretty much all there is to it.
Damon plays George Lonegan, a retired psychic with the kind of gift rarely seen outside of a screenplay. His pushy brother Billy (Jay Mohr) wants him to get back into the business so they can make some coin. But George wants only to be left alone to have a normal life -- attempts at romance tend to go sour when simply holding your date's hand tells you that she was sexually abused by her father. Awkward. Meanwhile Lonegan is being stalked by a determined client -- a troubled young boy who lost his twin brother in an accident.
De France plays TV host Marie Lelay, en vacance a Thailand on Dec. 26, 2004. She's shopping for trinkets when the big tsunami hits. Lelay already has a foot in Heaven when she is whisked back to Earth thanks to the intervention of two good samaritans. But she's been changed by the experience. Her producer boyfriend suggests she take a leave of absence to write that book about Francois Mitterand she's been planning. Imagine her poor publisher's surprise when the book turns out to be an exploration of the afterlife instead. Marie's producer boyfriend doesn't believe in the afterlife. So it's no surprise that he's a smug, superficial, fickle two-timer. What do you expect? The man doesn't even believe in Heaven.
When directors go towards the light
Heaven is an irresistible honey trap for filmmakers. It's the ultimate test of the imagination. If you saw The Lovely Bones, you know it's a test filmmakers often fail. Peter Jackson used CGI to create a series of inspirational poster cliches (e.g. a giant rose blooming under an icy lake). 1998's What Dreams May Come attempted something similar. Hereafter does not go far down that road, at least -- Eastwood's afterlife is merely shown as a shadowy plain full of blurry people, like a big, dry cocktail party with no snacks. This movie is more concerned with painting a reassuring picture of our enduring connection with the dead. "The evidence is irrefutable," a hospice doctor tells Marie. And it is -- in the movies. As played out here, the afterlife debate resembles a political panel on Fox News.
The movie covers its bases by acknowledging that shysters are out there, offering up a parade of psychic charlatans for our derision. But this is the pot calling the kettle black. Hereafter is just as guilty of peddling bogus revelation as the mirror-gazers and phony seers it claims to mock.
There's certainly nothing wrong with using cinema to explore the eternal mysteries. My personal favourite movie Heaven comes from Afterlife. In that 1998 Japanese film, the recently deceased spend a week choosing a single memory they will inhabit for all eternity. It's a beautiful idea, and it's used to tell a story about the nature of life and relationships. Good movies can do that. But that's not Hereafter. Hereafter has nothing genuine to say. It's just a pretentious reiteration of Ghost without the murder mystery or the cool black shadows that drag evildoers to Hell. Offered up as an affirmation of eternal love, Hereafter is actually cheap and cynical. If you're going to make a movie about death and grief, shouldn't it contain some truth? Shouldn't it say something real about the uncertainty and doubt and deep longing that survivors experience? Instead, Hereafter just gives us a magical dude offering simple answers to unanswerable questions. Utterly pointless.
Clint's heavy boot
With each passing film, Eastwood's 1992 masterpiece Unforgiven seems more and more miraculous. In movies like Hereafter, The Changeling and Million Dollar Baby, he fills the screen with cartoonish supporting characters and pounds home his points with drippy music. Give him this much -- Eastwood is one director who is resisting the 3-D craze. His cardboard characters couldn't support it.
I'm all for hope. I sincerely hope that when the time comes (and not too soon) my father will cross over the beautiful river and see his true love waiting. Meanwhile here on Earth, I sincerely hope that Hollywood's quota of "serious" movies will include something other than this type of emotional sugar high. In my movie Heaven, there will be no more cheap, pandering flicks like Hereafter. Amen. ![]()




21
Login or register to post comments
the real ODB
1 year ago
sheeesh!
OK kids, don't look him in the eye. Back up slowly, slowly... run away! run away!
badwalrus
1 year ago
When is the Tyee going to get some talented reviewers?
I am no fan of the less-than-mediocre dreck that passes for movies these days, and indeed Eastwood has made some stinkers. But this negative screed by Burgess isn't any better in quality or insight than the worst M. Night Shymalan fiasco! [ABUSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]
Just in case you are wondering what real criticism looks like and what it attempts to accomplish, here's a link to a database of pros from all over the continent writing about this movie. Like you, most don't respect it much, but what they say as to the reasons why is frequently worth reading http://www.mrqe.com/movies/m100073605
G West
1 year ago
Steve?
A psychic can retire?
Who knew....As a child of the manse, you're awfully critical of the God factor.
Haven't seen the movie...but it can't possibly be any worse than that Julia Roberts thing - 'Eat, Pray, Love' can it?
And, y'know, I think you have been dumping on Clint wayyy too much lately...as a re-formed drugstore cowboy he's doing just fine and a hell of a lot better than most hollywoood types.
And, as you yourself (almost) acknowledge, amongst the newly-wed and the nearly-dead, there is a lot of 'hope' still out there.
Maybe that's kind of a 'truth' too!
Steve Burgess
1 year ago
Clint bashing?
G West--It's true that a more vitriolic review--this one included--usually indicates some personal buttons have been pushed. In this case, there are two. One is that I seem to care more than most about what I consider the misuse of cinema's incredible power. I get very ticked by easy fables like this that do nothing but dish out comforting lies, or others that disseminate misinformation about historical events. The typical response is, "It's only a movie," but I think movies like this can truly be pernicious. The trouble with Hereafter is that no worthwhile larger point is being made. It's just an empty feel-good fairy tale.
And the other button being pushed is indeed the big red Clint one. When a movie like Million Dollar Baby wins Best Picture I admit to becoming somewhat unhinged. It may affect my opinions when I find what I consider to be similar flaws in later Clint efforts.
And badwalrus, thanks for the tips. In future I will study other reviews and make sure my views conform with theirs. Let's see--it's control + C for "copy" and control + V for "paste," right?
G West
1 year ago
Steve
Umm! Thanks for that, I guess! Although I think you're mostly ignoring the central point - y'know the one about 'hope'.
As for getting upset about what the 'academy' chooses to go thumbs up on every year!
You've got to be kidding.
I'll take a look at the movie and get back to you. My wife says I'm the world's severest critic - but, for the life of me, I can't get overwrought about Clint Eastwood's oeuvre.
He's not exactly in the 'auteur' class - but as a target for journalistic ire he's ought not be your biggest bull's eye - and yet, over time, seems to me you're going for HIM with a .44 magnum.
And, a final jab: My experience – of all athletic endeavors – especially ones that have attracted a writerly audience, boxing is maudlin, sentimental and philosophical in a way no other sport is. I think you need to have another look at ‘BABY’ in that context.
G West
1 year ago
errata
That should be 'he ought not be...' of course.
See what I mean about being a 'critic'.
badwalrus
1 year ago
Mis-use of Journalism's and Publishing's "incredible power"
[OFFENSIVE COMMENT DIRECTED AT A TYEE WRITER REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]
VivianLea Doubt
1 year ago
haven't seen the film...
Of course, I am obliged to say that. In your comments, Steve, you say "movies like this can truly be pernicious." Not sure about this particular movie, but I certainly agree with you...you could indeed, write about that.
Some might describe this as ...'"Girly fighting"--It's a joke. Pick your battles, folks. Save the outrage for the real issues.' Yes, you said that Steve, and so I can only echo G West, and say you appear to be focusing in the wrong direction here.
You notice, though, that I keep coming back to read your pieces ...one of them once moved me to tears, and a deep appreciation of the writing you can do.
John Greg
1 year ago
Mr S.B.
I think you have actually quite missed the point of what Million Dollar Baby was all about, and therefore you have what I consider to be an unwarranted hatred for it.
First hint: It is not about boxing.
Second hint (this will appear to be a non-sequitor, but it's not): American Psycho is not about murder or sex.
badwalrus
1 year ago
@ John Gregg Burgess thinks
[OFFENSIVE COMMENT DIRECTED AT A TYEE WRITER REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]
warbler
1 year ago
badwalrus
Your rants bear all the markings of a frustrated, failed writer whose submissions to bona fide publications like the Tyee have been repeatedly rejected, leaving you to stew in the margins of the comments sections.
The art of the negative review requires skill and precision. It also requires passion and sincerity, public reaction be damned. Burgess has repeatedly demonstrated he has all these elements.
badwalrus snorts:
The Tyee; You should be embarrassed to publish this irritating nonsense.
Ah, the irony in such comments! Especially when they are issued from behind the veil of anonymity.
badwalrus
1 year ago
@ warbler
Bull's eye, Mrs. Burgess, er - I mean, "warbler"! I hope I didn't hurt your son Stevie's feelings, even if he does offend my sensibilities with every keystroke. Two wrongs don't...
You nailed it, though, ma'am! You profiled me better than Hannibal on his most lucid day. I have not had a script ot treatment picked up since my salad days with Bonanza. You may remember my finest work wherein Hop-Singh was falsely accused of running a moonshine still on one of the far corners of the Ponderosa. That racist, overzealous sheriff locked him up without any real evidence, and the townspeople woulda strung him up at sunrise had Little Joe and Hoss not busted him out in a hail of righteous bullets and prairie dust... Hop-Singh was so grateful, he made them all a "vellee special" midnight snack. Great episode...
Anyways; lately I am more into avant garde poetry designed to best be conveyed through smartphones. I have patented a proprietary homage to the haiku specifically for use on Twitter. Here's one inspired by you:
Twit-koo
Beaucous
Couscous
F.U.
David Beers
1 year ago
badwalrus, please review Tyee's comment code
You're more than welcome to debate the writer on the claims made in the review in these threads. They are for substantive discussion. Insulting the writer (in your case repeatedly) or other commenters is not allowed on these threads. Please refrain.
http://thetyee.ca/Comments/FAQ/#7
dorothy
1 year ago
It's under that rock, no, that one...!
"If you're going to make a movie about death and grief, shouldn't it contain some truth?"
Huh? And where would you go to dig that up - pun intended - ? It's not as if a great number of folks have been there and back and made video recordings or indeed remember anything, is it? How do YOU know it isn't one great foggy cocktail party with blurry figures all around? It's not that different from the ideas of Hel and Hades and so on. Of course it is a Mecca for imagination marketers - we don't know anything at-all. Comfort? I don't know what shape and form of the hereafter I personally would find most comforting - oblivion and decay and the great recycler, or some ethereal version of my present three-dimensional self to waft through the spheres for 'all eternity'. Heh. As for connection with the dead, this is easily effected by going to their resting place and talking to them. All you need is a good dose of fly agaric or henbane, and a dark night between now and Yule. Whatever you didn't get around to find out while those whose who have gone beyond were still here, you will get answered all right. It'll be like little lights inside your head.
Steve Burgess
1 year ago
Dorothy and John
Dorothy--That's exactly my point. No one really knows. That's the agony of the human condition, and the pain of grief. No one knows. So instead of exploring that pain and uncertainty, a movie like Hereafter simply invents a psychic who really does know. Uncertainty solved! Yay!
John, I relish a rare opportunity to rant further about Million Dollar Baby. You say it's not about boxing, by which I take it you mean that this movie about boxing transcends its subject matter. But in order to transcend your ostensible subject, you must get that subject right. There's a difference between a great abstract painter and one who simply can't draw. The central plot twist of MDB is so ludicrous, so unrelated to reality, that it entirely destroys the film's credibility. You can't transcend the story if you did a crappy job telling it to begin with.
Plus there's that evil hillbilly family of hers. They made Ming the Merciless seem complex.
John Greg
1 year ago
S. B.
Well now, I cannot exactly disagree with you on that point. That was pretty over the top -- mind you, have you ever been to a trailer park? I have, and sometimes it's full-on yikes!
I guess it all just boils down to taste really. I mean, aside from the Hillbillies from Hell, I thought the movie did a good job of telling its story.
peedeecee
1 year ago
Why criticize Hereafter?
You think there's something wrong with cheap, mawkish sentiment and easy answers to some of life's greatest mysteries? You want rational, intelligent discussion, possibly without resolution, instead of maudlin, by-the-numbers comfort?
Get with the program, Burgess - slick and easy no-thought is what sells.
JimC
1 year ago
A bit heavy-handed on Clint
You are a bit too harsh in your criticism of Clint and his use of "cartoonish supporting characters". You forget Mystic River...
Conductor274
1 year ago
Get a life.
You need to get a life Burgess. It's a movie! Only a movie! Hollywood produces fluff for entertainment purposes. Trying to put some serious spin on them is lame. Get a life!
Jesper Haaps
1 year ago
Get A Life?
People, can we have a moratorium on the phrase "get a life", particularly in response to a review(er) we disagree with? It's up there with "it's political correctness gone mad" in terms of imagination-deficit and all-round irritation quotient. Let's argue the merits, or lack of, instead of resorting to ad hominems, yeah?
Anyway the movie in question I haven't seen, and probably won't, but I did want to also defend Clint's Mystic River, which had its flaws, but was decent and quite compelling.
cw
1 year ago
Message? You want a movie to send a message?
I may be wrong about the source of this comment, but I believe it was Elia Kazan who, when asked what message he was trying to send with one of his movies, said something to the effect of "Message? I make movies. If I want to send a message I'll call Western Union."
Movies are for entertainment. It's a bonus if there's something in them one could find enlightening or uplifting, that's not in the basic purpose.
My 2 cents worth.