We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

If you look to your past you'll find your present. Take the website Ruins in Process: Vancouver Art in the Sixties. Much Vancouver art of that era was multimedia-obsessed process-based work that emphasized collaboration and community. You could say the same about the Internet.

For Ruins in Process, the ironies simply begin there.

Another is that we simply don't see enough websites like Ruins, which offers a trove of artwork, essays and interviews of interest to both academic and popular audiences. Sure, there are countless blogs about art. Any artist with a painted shake to sell has a website where you can buy it. Academics use the Internet extensively for research. But there are too few smartly curated online galleries like this one.

"The institutions and systems of the art world don't know quite what to do with [the Internet]," says Lorna Brown, a visual artist, curator and the site's editor and project manager. Perhaps, she says, artists' obsession with the notion of a permanent archival record underlies this tentative relationship with a medium that can have its plug pulled.

Ironically, of course, artists in Vancouver in the 1960s would have had no such difficulty with the Internet's ephemeral aspect. Assemblages of marine flotsam and jetsam, performance art, a pile of unmarked boxes in the middle of a Pender Street sidewalk -- these things were made to disappear. Their impermanence was essential to them.

An historical feast

Also essential at that time was the idea that Vancouver offered a blank canvas unfettered by history and expectation. Notwithstanding the efforts of artists and architects from Jack Shadbolt to BC Binning and Arthur Erickson, Vancouver really was Nowheresville in the art world. Of course, that meant most history came from elsewhere. Yet Ruins also offers a window on the roots of the internationally influential Vancouver School of photography, on the origins of a strong text-based tradition in Vancouver art, and on an important transitional period in aboriginal imagery.

For the serious student, there are essays like "Making Indian Art 'Modern'". For the '60s nostalgia junkie, there are the films What Happened Last Summer and The Be In, and a provocative Jerry Rubin speech to an auditorium full of amused acolytes and skeptics. For people who doubt that anything really important to the international art world happened way back when in Vancouver, there are bios of people like Iain Baxter. For those curious about the lively UBC scene, there are the recollections of people such as Abraham Rogatnick, who seemed to remember everything until he died on August 28 at the age of 85.

The site is rich with the images and stories of people -- Al Neil, Carole Itter, Robert Davidson, Gathie Falk -- whose work has continued to evolve and influence life in this city. It's a fascinating site to browse.

What money can buy

Of course, one reason Ruins is so good, and why sites like Ruins are so uncommon, is that it did cost money -- that annoying anathema to both democratizing process-based artists in the 1960s and some current internet aficionados. Ruins was built with a $268,000 grant from Heritage Canada and another $120,000 in in-kind contributions from the grunt Gallery and UBC's Morris and Helen Belkin Gallery.

These are hardly trifling sums of money. And here's another irony: as the Internet lays waste to entrenched ideas about intellectual property and who pays for what, the site hews to one very old-fashioned ideal. More than a third of the Heritage Canada money covered payment to artists whose work is exhibited.

Mostly that's a good thing, yet some frustration arises from copyright concerns: the images are often smaller than they ought to be, a concession to the fears about unauthorized duplication and use of the artwork on the site. In that regard, at least, this new-tech online exhibition is rather more conservative than the old art scene it documents.

It's a trifling complaint, however, about a project that shows the way for those who want to bring artwork that's dispersed in private collections or squirreled away in darkened museum storage rooms out into the light of public view.

Ruins in Process: Art in Vancouver in the Sixties will be celebrated with a party Thursday, September 3 at the Or Gallery, 555 Hamilton Street, at 7 o'clock.  [Tyee]

You Are Invited

The website Ruins in Process: Art in Vancouver in the Sixties will be celebrated with a party Thursday, September 3 at the Or Gallery, 555 Hamilton Street, Vancouver, at 7 o'clock.

To view the web site go here.

  • Share:

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll

{% include 02-organisms/sections/builder-modal.html %}